Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chris Bowers: Electability Data Does Not Support Anti-Clinton Electability Narratives

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 08:07 AM
Original message
Chris Bowers: Electability Data Does Not Support Anti-Clinton Electability Narratives
(After poll analysis and number crunching provided at the link below...)

Here are my thoughts on all of this data:

* Clinton’s deficit in general election matchups against Rudy Giuliani, relative to Obama and Edwards, has entirely disappeared in non-Rasmussen polls. While she once clearly performed worse than Edwards and Obama in non-Rasmussen general election trial heats against Rudy Giuliani, that is no longer the case. In fact, now she performs slightly better than Edwards and Obama in non-Rasmussen polls.
* Different polls are stronger for some candidates than they are for others. For example, the LA Times / Bloomberg poll is far worse for Clinton than it is for Obama and Edwards. The reasons for this are not entirely clear, but are probably connected to an oversampling of certain demographics that are either very favorable or very unfavorable to a given candidate. This could mean an oversampling of independents (which would hurt Clinton relative to Obama and Edwards), an oversampling of women (which would help Clinton relative to Obama and Edwards), or an oversampling of young voters (which would help Obama relative to Clinton and Edwards). There does not appear to be a broad pattern consistent across more than a handful of polls.
* Rasmussen is all over the map. Even as most other polls are showing Clinton improving against Giuliani relative to Obama, Rasmussen shows the exact opposite. Since mid-June, Rasmussen also shows Edwards as the most electable, while the other four polls taken during the same time period show the opposite. Once again, this creates serious problems when attempting to discern broad trends across all polls.

In short, across the board I don’t think that there is any clear evidence pointing to Hillary Clinton as less electable than Barack Obama and John Edwards at this time. Since June 11th, she only performs worse in the overall mean when all of Rasmussen’s four polls taken during that time period are included. This will further complicate attempts to take away her perceived advantage within the rank and file on “electability,” and thus further strengthen her position in the nomination campaign. If another candidate is going to pass her in the campaign, this does not strike me as a promising route for any candidate to pursue.

http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=38A2682ACB65E6BA8454DA9ABD0A682C?diaryId=1019
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Electability: Either you are or you aren't
Obama, Clinton and Edwards are all electable. The candidates regularly argue over who is more electable. I call BS on that one. Once our party picks an electable nominee, then its up to us and the candidate to win the election. All we have to do is run a strong, smart campaign. Either of these guys candidates could win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobalt1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think any of the three candidates WILL win regardless of the republican nominee.
Barring any of the three "being caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy".

Clinton and Obama have already built a great organization in most of the country. Edwards is a little more limited due to lack of funds, but I trust a trial lawyer not to make any huge gaffes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Same here-nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm not seeing it.
Edited on Tue Aug-28-07 08:28 AM by Dawgs
She finishes third when using www.realclearpolitics.com averages.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/national.html

Rudy Giuliani (R) vs. Barack Obama (D)
RCP Average 07/15 to 08/21 - 41.8% 45.8% Obama +4.0%
Rudy Giuliani (R) vs. John Edwards (D)
RCP Average 07/12 to 08/23 - 43.0% 45.0% Edwards +2.0%
Rudy Giuliani (R) vs. Hillary Clinton (D)
RCP Average 07/15 to 08/14 - 44.4% 44.6% Clinton +0.2%

Fred Thompson (R) vs. Barack Obama (D)
RCP Average 07/15 to 08/21 - 35.3% 48.8% Obama +13.5%
Fred Thompson (R) vs. John Edwards (D)
RCP Average 07/12 to 08/23 - 35.7% 48.0% Edwards +12.3%
Fred Thompson (R) vs. Hillary Clinton (D)
RCP Average 07/15 to 08/14 - 41.0% 47.3% Clinton +6.3%

John McCain (R) vs. John Edwards (D)
RCP Average 07/12 to 08/13 - 38.7% 46.7% Edwards +8.0%
John McCain (R) vs. Barack Obama (D)
RCP Average 07/17 to 08/13 - 38.7% 45.3% Obama +6.6%
John McCain (R) vs. Hillary Clinton (D)
RCP Average 07/17 to 08/16 - 42.3% 46.0% Clinton +3.7%

Mitt Romney (R) vs. Barack Obama (D)
RCP Average 06/20 to 08/16 - 36.5% 50.0% Obama +13.5%
Mitt Romney (R) vs. John Edwards (D)
RCP Average 06/20 to 07/19 - 37.3% 49.7% Edwards +12.4%
Mitt Romney (R) vs. Hillary Clinton (D)
RCP Average 06/21 to 07/18 - 38.3% 48.0% Clinton +9.7%

The closest she comes to any other candidate is 3.8% (Giuliani). And, 3.8% is a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. you missed a vital part of the OP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. What did I miss? Ignoring the Rasmussen polling?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. All bets are off, this is the most unusual political cycle I have followed since 1960 when I first
voted.

The dynamic is ever shifting, and the ebb and flow has not been established, nor will it be, until January '08 hits.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Answer one question please
Which of these polls measures the percentage of Repub voters who would stay home or vote 3rd party if the GOP nominee is a Mormon or an adulterer, but would change their mind and vote for the devil himself if our nominee is Hillary Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC