Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton Returning 850,000! linked to Hsu

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 07:25 PM
Original message
Clinton Returning 850,000! linked to Hsu
WASHINGTON -- Confronted with new evidence that it had ignored warnings about fundraiser Norman Hsu, Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign abruptly announced late today that it was returning $850,000 from 260 donors associated with Hsu.

The announcement was made five minutes after the Los Angeles Times asked Clinton officials to respond to mid-June campaign e-mails the newspaper obtained that dismissed concerns about Hsu and his business practices.



"I can tell you with 100 certainty that Norman Hsu is NOT involved in a ponzi scheme," wrote Samantha Wolf, who had the title West Coast finance director for the campaign. She has since left the campaign. "He is COMPLETELY legit." She wrote the e-mail in June to a party official who was asking questions about Hsu and his reputation in the financial world.

The campaign also announced it was instituting new procedures to check out major contributors, including running criminal background checks.

Hsu, 56, has contributed or raised more than $1.2 million for Clinton and other Democrats -- one of the party's leading fundraisers. But Hsu became a source of embarrassment after The Times revealed in late August that he was a fugitive wanted on a 15-year-old bench warrant stemming from an early 1990s investment fraud case. He called the matter a misunderstanding, then failed to show at a San Mateo County hearing and was rearrested last week in Colorado after falling ill there on an eastbound train.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/la-na-hsu11sep11,1,7623157.story?coll=la-news-politics-national&track=crosspromo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. I guess that puts her well under OBAMA for fundraising, then?
Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Clinton is setting an example that should be followed by all. This could
get very expensive for all the candidates.....if they follow suit.



http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/la-na-hsu11sep11,1,7623157.story?page=1&track=crosspromo&coll=la-news-politics-national




Nearly all major presidential campaigns rely on bundlers, and most do the same minimal background checks that the Clinton campaign had employed.

Generally, campaign officials said, those background checks involve a campaign worker running the name of a major donor or bundler through a public database such as LexisNexis, which provides access to newspaper, magazine and journal articles, as well as congressional transcripts and television broadcasts.

>

Anthony Corrado, a campaign expert at Colby College, said that though the refunds announced by Clinton on Monday were "certainly significant," he doubted that the loss of $850,000 would "have a material effect" on the senator's campaign, which has raised more than $55 million so far. He predicted that Bill Clinton's upcoming fundraiser for his wife, aimed at expatriates in London, would replace the loss.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC