Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

S-CHIP debate sends Republicans over the edge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 03:09 PM
Original message
S-CHIP debate sends Republicans over the edge
Edited on Sat Oct-13-07 03:25 PM by babylonsister
S-CHIP debate sends Republicans over the edge
Posted October 13th, 2007 at 2:21 pm


The irony of the last couple of weeks is that the debate over the State’s Children’s Health Insurance Program (S-CHIP) was supposed to be one of the easy ones. Way back in July, the WaPo’s Christopher Lee noted, “If anything looked like a sure thing in the new Congress, it was that lawmakers would renew, and probably expand, the popular, decade-old State Children’s Health Insurance Program before it expires this year.” It was a no-brainer — who was going to balk at an established, successful program that offers health insurance for kids?

Dems and Republicans reached a compromise version, which drew praise from governors, the medical community, and children’s advocates. Of all the bills likely to spark a political war, this was going to be at the bottom of the list.

And yet, here we are. S-CHIP garnered an inexplicable veto, the right is smearing a 12-year-old kid and his family, and Republicans on the Energy and Commerce Committee are issuing breathtaking press releases like this one.

Republican Senate hopeful Montgomery Burns today joined with Mayor Joe Quimby, D-Springfield, to support the Senate’s gazillion-dollar SCHIP bill.

“If the poor children can get a piece of the action, why can’t I?” explained Burns at a MoveOn.org rally in Capital City. “The little darlings are needy? Me, too. I need somebody to pay. Quimby here says he knows a bunch of low-income nobodies who are ripe for the picking. Excellent.”

“You need this?” wondered the mayor. “Well, why not. I’ve got needs, too. Why, I’ve got 27 paternity suits pending and to quote the Speaker, ’suffer the little children.’ The Quimby Compound is overflowing with those little sufferers. Vote Quimby.”

Inexplicably, the mayor then leaned toward a comely MoveOn organizer and whispered in her ear, “Ah, if anyone asks, you’re my niece from out of town and you don’t get SCHIP.”

“But Uncle Joe, I am your niece from out of town, and I do get SCHIP.”


It actually gets worse from there, including multiple references to “rental children.”

The Republican committee staff added a tongue-in-cheek disclaimer at the bottom of this inanity that read, “Actual facts and events may vary, but really, how much?”

more...

http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/13226.html#more-13226
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Um - satire alert
Montgomery Burns? Mayor Quimby? Springfield?

Sometimes it's hard to tell truth from the Onion anymore and it would've fooled me if they didn't put those names in there. Says a lot about the asshole republickers that we'd believe this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That one hi-lighted section is, as was admitted in the article, but the
whole thing isn't. I do think the rethugs have gone over the edge on this. Seems like they just want to pick a fight, even if it is with a 12-year old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It can't really be satirized because it just ain't funny
Edited on Sat Oct-13-07 04:01 PM by tularetom
This family was earning $45,000 per year (pretty close to median earnings for an American family) IIRC, and one catastrophic accident wipes them out. I read somewhere that some of the idiot freepers thought this family's income was high enough to be called "wealthy". So I looked up the median family income in MD and it turned out it was in excess of $80,000 per year.

Point is this could happen to anybody, including the douchebags that are ridiculing the kid and his family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-13-07 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It did happen in TX, not exactly the same, but some R bonehead
in TX several years ago fought tooth and nail to get "caps" on insurance payments for people hurt in auto accidents, it went through, and within a month, this clown's son was in a terrible accident that turned his son into a 24 hour care case, for the rest of his life...:(

This TX senator then tried to exclude himself from the law just passed, so he could collect for the care of his son. The TX SC ruled agains him, and he had an epeiphany of just how karma works.

I feel for the kid, but it was his father that helped to destroy what life this youngster will have. I have heard a rumor that the legislator turned his son over to the TX DHHS, and he is a ward of the state now, but I cannot prove that, it was long enough ago that I can't even recall his name.

The ONLY entity that benefitted was the insurance company, just what this jerk wanted to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC