Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Edwards' 'Electability' Argument Working in Iowa?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 01:45 AM
Original message
Is Edwards' 'Electability' Argument Working in Iowa?
Is Edwards' 'Electability' Argument Working in Iowa?
Wednesday, October 24, 2007 4:10 PM
By Andrew Romano
Newsweek

If you ever forget that Iowa isn't Washington, D.C., driving the 50 or so miles from Omaha, Nebraska to the tiny Hawkeye State hamlet of Sidney should serve as a pretty good reminder. First it's the casinos--Harrahs, Ameristar, a riverboat, a dog track, some joint advertising a "Super Sexy Football Party." Then comes the big Bass Pro Shop. The RV center. The Cracker Barrel. The pickup hauling an armada of ATVs. And field after field of dried-up cornstalks. No politicos in sight.

(snip)

That's where electability comes in. According to his advisers, electable means "less divisive than Clinton" and "more experienced than Obama." But the D.C. types aren't buying it. As a white man claiming to have more appeal nationwide than a black man and a woman, Edwards, they say, is treading on "sensitive" ground--and it has the potential to backfire. Potential, maybe. But judging by today's "community meeting" in Sidney, it hasn't yet. Around 12:45, Edwards strode into "The Gathering Place," a small, white clapboard theater near the center of town. Bruce Springsteen's "Promised Land" was playing on the stereo. The sheriff, Steve MacDonald, had just finished reciting his introduction from a cue card ("This. Is. An. Honor..."), and twenty sullen high-school seniors slumped behind him on stage. Edwards took the mic and smiled. Over the next 30 minutes, he spoke about lobbyists, Iraq, media monopolies, pharmaceutical advertising and Hillary Clinton's "inevitability" ("Did I miss something?" he joked. "Was I asleep when y'all caucused?"). But he didn't mention the whole electable thing.

The thing was, he didn't have to. As the meeting ended, I approached Cliff and Donna Ferguson of nearby Hamburg (pop. 1,200). Cliff, a retiree, looked a like beardless, cynical Santa Claus; he was wearing a camouflage trucker hat. Donna was dressed in green sweats. After listening to Cliff rip on the "ridiculous" caucus system--"In 2004, only nine people caucused in Hamburg. And five of them were Fergusons!"--I asked why he and Donna were supporting Edwards in 2008. "Edwards is the most electable by a mile," he said. "The Republicans won't stop at nothing to tear down our side." But why Edwards and not, say, Obama? "Well, you know," he said, hesitating. "Obama's drawback is obvious. Don't get me wrong. I'm gonna vote for him if the gets the nomination. But if he does, all kinds of people will crawl out from under their rocks and throw mud. Boy, it'll be ugly. And it's the same with Hillary, 'cause she's a woman. Attacks are all they have, the Republicans. That and God and the flag." He smirked for second, then got serious. "Edwards is our best shot."

Of course, the Beltway pundits are right about one thing: John Edwards can't make that argument. But folks like the Fergusons can--and are. Sure, it may raise eyebrows in Washington. But in places like Sidney, it seem to be working.

http://www.blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2007/10/24/is-edwards-s-electability-argument-working.aspx

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. I agree
I keep haveing the vision of Edwards having that deer in the headlights look. in a debate with a republican. the republican will say something out of his ass. and Edwards "will have to give that more thought."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. What the hell are you talking about?
You aren't making sense. It sounds like a smear, which we damned sure don't need any more of, but I'm not entirely certain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 04:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think Edwards
Like Hillary, will lose the GE. Close, but still lose none the less. The repubes Prefer Hillary as the opponent. And are prepairing for Edwards also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 04:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. How are they "prepairing" for Edwards?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I do not know as i am not
a repube. however I will never underestimate them again. Their rhetoric sugests they are watching the "front runners" and prepairing a file.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiseguy182 Donating Member (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. electability
Edwards's electability is a tough sell. For all intents and purposes, a guy that woulda/coulda/shoulda almost became vice president should be polling better than a distant third. And when there's serious doubts he could even carry North Carolina, it's a tough sell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Does Joe Lieberman rings a bell?
about a guy that "woulda/coulda/shoulda almost became vice president"?

Indeed, about this time four years ago, Lieberman was pretty high in, at least, name recognition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC