who wiLL you vote for?

a hypotheticaL baLLot for 2008.

democratic nominee: kodos.



pLatform: ensLaving mankind to buiLd a superweapon; keeping troops in iraq untiL the two moons of kandar are aLLigned; supports roe v. wade.

repubLican nominee: kang.



pLatform: wants to eventuaLLy feast on the fLesh of aLL mankind, starting with the obese; keeping troops in iraq untiL the two moons of kandar are aLLigned; opposes roe v. wade as he needs more fLesh.

some third party candidate.

3rd party's pLatform: some moonbat, hippy shit that wouLd never fLy in reaLity. and besides, if you even dear pick this guy, you're basicaLLy voting for kang. so why don't you just grow up and vote for kodos.

Or do you still believe that there's no difference between Bush and Gore?

Gore was both compassionate and conservative but Bush wasn't either. :wow:

Clinton legacy. Bush uses renditions, but Clinton set up the system. Am I supposed to applaud because Clinton only sent a few people out to be tortured?

I believe that the Kang v Kodos theme emerged in response to the Clinton v Dole match-up.

And nobody would ask you to applaud or even excuse Clinton's failings. But to not vote for Gore because of that is throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Had just 1% of the hundred thousand Florida Nader votes gone to Gore instead, Bush wouldn't have happened--and neither would have Iraq, gitmo, Abu Ghraib, extraordinary renditions, secret prisons, tax cuts, loosened pollution controls, etc., etc., etc.

started under Clinton? We were bombing Iraq on regular basis during Clinton's administration. The secret prisons, the extraordinary renditions? they were happening under Clinton. How much did CLinton do that made it easier for George to take the next step?

as his VP nominee. We have respectable people like Senator Clinton suggesting that they might have to consider torture as a possibility in certain circumstances. Who knows what he would have allowed himself to get boxed into?

but I'd really rather grab a spaceship out of here.

May the force be with you!

I swear I will sit this election out, or vote third party. I
cannot support a corporate whore!

:evilgrin:

Kodos is OBVIOUSLY better. Besides, we cannot have a superweapon gap.

He's just been badly smeared by the corporate media.

better fall in line

a moonbat who still believes all the hippy shit who wishes to create a reality where that shit would fly I will vote 3rd party. :)

At least that is what people tell me. :hi:

You forgot gay marriage!

Oh yes, I am all growed up already hence knowing all the hippy shit that I lived and still love.

and her decision to keep troops in iraq untiL the two moons of kandar aLLign, is actuaLLy the pacifist approach.

That is why her top advisor's are ex mercenaries. I wondered about that. So they are pacifist ex mercenaries? OK. The troops are for peace keeping unless things get ugly then they can shoot again. Right? :crazy:

...but he'll probably just whine about how those mean voters didn't give him the votes he was entitled to, and blame them for everything Kang does.

It worked so well the last two times, y'know?

and should be deported at once.