Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Nation: Only Bill Richardson Stands Out

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Carrieyazel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 03:46 PM
Original message
The Nation: Only Bill Richardson Stands Out
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20071126/anderson


The best national candidate. Takes bold positions. A winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. and he is more than eager to steal water
from the Great Lakes. Is he gonna campaign in Wisconsin or Illinois. There is a poll in the Nation today asking its readers their choices. Last I checked. Dennis Kucinich was winning in a landslide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. That is a lie. He never said anything about taking water from the Great Lakes.
He mentioned water policy and it was immediately turned around by some Michigan supporters of another candidate that Richardson wanted to pipe water from Michigan to Las Vegas. It would be prohibitively expensive to do such a thing. It would be much less expensive and much more practical to use tertiary water treatment instead of piping millions of gallons of water 1700 miles.

Richardson was talking about the need for a national water policy. He wants a cabinet level position to deal with water issues and help mediate between states on water issues. He has a strong emphasis on water conservation in his plan. With the drought in the South East and the fights currently occurring over water flow Lake Lanier, this is a great need.

Living here in Florida, his water policy is one of the reasons I support him. He is the only candidate that is not afraid of addressing this issue. The rest of the campaigns have stayed relatively quiet on it because of the contentious nature of water rights. The furor over Richardson's innocent remarks demonstrates the need for a national water policy.

Here's his statement reemphasizing the points he had made earlier in his campaign on water issues.

SANTA FE, NM-- Presidential candidate New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson's national press secretary Tom Reynolds today released the following statement on Richardson's water policy for America's future:

"As president, Gov. Richardson will launch a national dialogue on water issues affecting all parts of the country, including quality, conservation, efficiency and reuse. While certain areas of the country enjoy greater water supplies than others, Richardson in no way proposes federal transfers of water from one region of the nation to the other. Richardson believes firmly in keeping water in its basin of origin and of the rights of states to oversee water distribution.

"As governor of a western state, Richardson understands more than others the importance of protecting our water supplies. In New Mexico he has developed a statewide water initiative, he has created a statewide strategic water reserve, and he has created a water innovation fund and a water trust fund to invest in water conservation and production.

"As President Gov. Richardson will embrace a national water policy that will specifically help protect the authority of states and the rights of local communities throughout the country."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I suggest you email Gov. Granholm
last I knew she is not convinced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. She also endorsed Hillary right after she stirred the pot on that issue.
What they are pushing for is a regional compact on the Great Lakes. They twisted Richardson's statement to get support for that compact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. There is a regional compact on the use of the Great Lakes.
It's already in existence. If the west thinks they can steal Canadian water, I suspect those proponents will have to settle the issue in International courts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. This is the compact Granholm and the others are pushing.
Edited on Sat Nov-10-07 06:45 PM by seasat
Only two Great Lake states have approved this. Granholm and some of the others were twisting Richardson's remarks on water policy to get support for it.

The reason why their characterization of Richardson's water policy is ridiculous is the cost of such a project. If such a pipeline cost the same as the Alaskan pipeline, it would run 48 billion dollars to cover the distance from Chicago to Las Vegas. It may even cost more since you would have to purchase right of ways across a populated region. If it moved the same volume of water as the Alaskan pipeline moves oil, that would only cover just over 200,000 residents in Las Vegas. That's a cost of about 234,000 per resident covered. Richardson is a realist. There is no way he would support such a plan.

IMHO, Richardson has the best environmental record of our candidates. He's protected millions of acres from oil and gas drilling. He's enacted an aggressive greenhouse gas reduction plan in NM. He's joined with other states to sue the Bush administration so they can increase emission standards for automobiles in NM. He sat on the board of the Natural Resources Defense Council. He's even stood up to protect reintroduced wolves from being killed because of ridiculous Shrub inc policies. There's no way he'd support siphoning off water from the Great Lakes because of the environmental problems that would occur.

Here's the statement that they raised such as stink about:

“I believe that Western states and Eastern states have not been talking to each other when it comes to proper use of our water resources,” Richardson told the Sun. “I want a national water policy. We need a dialogue between states to deal with issues like water conservation, water reuse technology, water delivery and water production. States like Wisconsin are awash in water.”


Where in that statement is there a mention of piping water from the Great Lakes? The article shows the background on the issue in Nevada. The dispute is between the states over water rights to the Colorado River and doesn't have anything to do with the Great Lakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Seems a news release by the governor of Wisconsin
was not very happy either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting poll ... thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I'd think it a good idea to limit the poll to Nation readers.
why not. I'd like to know what Nation readers think, not outsiders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. So far, polls taken of more Liberal audiences have favored Edwards and
Kuchinich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Nation: not endorsing anyone at the moment.
This article is one of eight written by The Nation contributors:

Other Essays in This Series:

John Nichols for Joseph Biden http://www.thenation.com/doc/20071126/nichols
Ellen Chesler for Hillary Clinton http://www.thenation.com/doc/20071126/chesler
Katherine S. Newman for John Edwards http://www.thenation.com/doc/20071126/newman
Bruce Shapiro for Christopher Dodd http://www.thenation.com/doc/20071126/shapiro
Richard Kim for Mike Gravel http://www.thenation.com/doc/20071126/kim
Gore Vidal for Dennis Kucinich http://www.thenation.com/doc/20071126/vidal
Michael Eric Dyson for Barack Obama http://www.thenation.com/doc/20071126/dyson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. I doubt they will
Edited on Sun Nov-11-07 01:42 AM by cyclezealot
They only seem to comment upon who is and is not progressive. The readers are capable of deciding from there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. Only Nation readers should participate.
Nation readers views should be the predominant voice in a Nation poll. I'd limit it to us, if I could. BUt, latest Nation Poll results. My favorite Dennis Kucinich, 33%, O bama, 27%, Richardson 7%. I hope that influences the management at the Nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is one essay of several. Your headline reads like an endorsement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. Forget Richardson. He's soft on illegal immigration. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Why? Because his plan has the support of the majority of US citizens.
Edited on Sat Nov-10-07 05:30 PM by seasat
Here's the polls on immigration.

Here's Richardson's plan.

He supports increasing border security. He supports increased penalties for employers of illegal immigrants. He supports a fair path to citizenship for those already here. The majority support that too.

He also addresses important issues like aiding in economic development in Latin America through programs such as micro-credit to create jobs so they won't have to come here for work.

Most folks to the left of Tom Tancredo find Richardson's immigration policy to be a moderate and realistic plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. Rocky Anderson, the Salt Lake City Mayor wrote this article.
Here's an excerpt:

The positive choice is Bill Richardson, the candidate who has the greatest depth of experience, as a member of Congress, UN ambassador, Energy Secretary and governor of New Mexico. Richardson has for years been an inspiring leader in the fight against global warming. He recently signed into law a bill that requires New Mexico utilities to quadruple their use of renewable energy. Armed with the most aggressive plan to gain energy independence and reduce the emission of greenhouse gases, Richardson would provide the crucial environmental leadership sorely lacking in the United States.

Bill Richardson is smart, likable and dedicated to the best of progressive principles. He would allow working families and small businesses to purchase healthcare coverage through the same plan enjoyed by members of Congress. He is the only candidate who has declared that acceptance of Roe v. Wade as established law will be a necessary condition for his Supreme Court nominees. While in Congress, he voted against, and continues to oppose, the military's disrespectful and discriminatory "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy. He proudly stands for equal legal rights for all families, including same-sex couples.

The kidnapping, disappearing and torture of people around the world, a trademark of the human-rights-abusing Bush Administration, will stand as one of our nation's most immense moral disgraces. As President, Bill Richardson will put an end to these abhorrent practices and help restore our moral standing among nations.

Bill Richardson, a proven consensus-builder, has scored significant diplomatic successes. He has the broadest experience and a genuine commitment to fundamental Democratic values. He is, indeed, on our side of the line, and he will be a President who will make us proud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC