Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ACLU-SC Calls for Impeachment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 02:11 PM
Original message
ACLU-SC Calls for Impeachment
Edited on Thu Nov-15-07 02:13 PM by davidswanson
ACLU-SC Calls for Impeachment of Bush and Cheney

The ACLU of Southern California has called for the impeachment of President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney for High Crimes and Misdemeanors arising out of their abuse of power and numerous violations of the Constitution.

The Board of Directors of the ACLU-SC voted on November 14, 2007 without objection (and one abstention) to call on Congress to promptly convene impeachment hearings.

In March, 1971 and again in July, 1973 the ACLU-SC called for the impeachment of Richard M. Nixon. In September of 1973, the National Board of the ACLU joined the call for impeachment.

The ACLU-SC will shortly release a report detailing the grounds for impeachment of Bush and Cheney.

________



Here is a PDF one-page 3-fold flyer consisting of excerpts from the ACLU's 1973 pamphlet. This is a powerful tool. No changes are needed to make clear what the duty of every American and the ACLU is today. This was put together by Susan Serpa. Front. Back.

The ACLU placed a full page ad in the New York Times calling for President Nixon's impeachment. The ad "asked readers to write their representatives in Congress, make a contribution to the ACLU, and join if not already a member." The response was overwhelming and "ver 25,000 new members joined in 1973 alone, driving the ACLU's membership to an all-time high of 275,000."

In Defense of American Liberties - A History of the ACLU, Samuel Walker, p. 294, Southern Illinois University Press (2nd ed. 1999.)

"When the Watergate scandal became a major issue in 1973, only a few dissenting voices remained to argue that seeking the impeachment of President Nixon was a political enterprise beyond the ACLU's proper sphere of concerns."
Inside the ACLU: Activism and Anti-Communism in the Late 1960s, Alan Rostron, p.427, New England Law Review (Vol. 33:2 Winter, 1999.)

After President Nixon "refused to hand over crucial tapes," the special prosecutor sued and "the question of the extent of presidential power reached the Supreme Court. The ACLU filed the only amicus brief in the case." The brief "argued that 'the fundamental issue raised in this case is whether the President, acting in his sole discretion, can disregard an obligation imposed on all other citizens to produce evidence demonstrably material to the trial of criminal charges of obstruction of justice in a federal court.'" On July 24, the Supreme Court ordered President Nixon to hand over the tapes and "held that 'an absolute, unqualified privilege would 'plainly conflict with the functions of the courts' in conducting criminal prosecutions."

ACLU pamphlet from 1973.

Excerpt:

16. Your Representative must be made to understand that this is not merely another "come and go" political question. Only you can make your Representative understand the importance of the issue and the extent to which he or she will be held responsible in the 1974 elections for his or her actions.

17. It cannot be stressed strongly enough or often enough that Representatives who do not move to impeach, and who thereby fail to bring President Nixon to trial, are accomplices to a cover-up. They are either in favor of bringing 100% of the truth to the American people, or they are helping cover it up.

In December 2005, the ACLU took out a full page ad in the NY Times calling for a special counsel to investigate Bush and the NSA warrantless electronic surveillance. They compared Bush to Nixon. The ad is still on the ACLU website and it clearly threatens impeachment, but that was over 2 years ago! See ad.

In 2006 an ACLU panel urged impeachment.

NOW WHERE IS THE ACLU?

Here's the nonsensical case the current ACLU president makes against impeachment.

http://afterdowningstreet.org/aclu

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. For the love of GOD, Nancy!
Just Put It Back On The Table FORCRYINGOUTLOUD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Wouldn't you think she'd get the hint? Wouldn't you think she'd understand
that patience is running out in the American public and they had best start to do what they were elected to do (and only what they were elected to do). They're using their elected positions either because they know its the ex-government officials that get elected to the boards of the major corporations, not some applicant off the street. So they use this as a 'stepping stone' OR they're in it because they feel that they're entitled, either by birth or money, to determine how this country should be run. They sure aren't acting for the best interests of the people of the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I know what you mean! I'm waiting, now, to hear all the high-minded
and somberly-intoned (complete with - WOW! strongly-worded statements! And YOWZA!! non-binding resolutions!!!) announcement about how they're caving to bush AGAIN on funding the war, and they're gonna give the brat-ass teenager another credit card to max out instead of taking ALL his allowance AND the car keys AWAY from him.

Can't wait for that one. How long do you think it'll be before we get there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. A couple days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. Seems ACLU Nat'l Has "Gone Beltway"
No impeachment for torture and war crimes because it "deflects responsibility from the Democrats."

What planet are these people on?

---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hooray. STOP the DECEIT now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC