I read it and couldn't believe it.
Marc Santora wrote a long article focused on John McCain's approach towards Hillary Clinton. I patiently read Santora's mushy words waiting for him to at least hint to his readers that one of McCain's followers had called Hillary Clinton a bitch recently, that McCain called her question "excellent", and that McCain cashed in on the insult. Instead, Santora focused on today's more tempered speech by McCain.
At no point did this good for nothing excuse of a journalist put these events into context.
That the word "bitch" cannot be printed in the NY Times is irrelevant, because the incident can be worded in many different ways. There was no reference to that incident at all.
He praised McCain for "outlining a series of contrasts with her on issues including national security and health care" in a speech today.
He praised McCain for "trying to do it in a markedly different way from his two main rivals, Rudolph W. Giuliani and Mitt Romney]
Santora kept contrasting McCain with "Giuliani and Romney", ignoring that it weren't them who called Clinton a "bitch" or laughed about it.
Read for yourselves:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/19/us/politics/19mccain.html?hpAnd
send an email to Marc Santora