After Lott: Dems Think Election Law Gives Them Shot At Winning Seat
By Greg Sargent - November 26, 2007, 5:47PM
In the wake of Trent Lott's announcement that he's resigning from the Senate, several news accounts have reported that Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour, a Republican, will immediately appoint a replacement -- and Barbour further announced today that a special election will be held to fill the seat on election day in November of 2008.
This would be a big boon to Republican efforts to hold Lott's seat. That's because it would allow whoever the appointee is the next 11 months to build up a record, raise money, and amass the advantages of incumbency in advance of the special contest.
But what does election law really hold?
National Dems who are scrutinizing the relevant statute say that they think that in fact it stipulates that the election is to be held within 90 days of the date of Lott's resignation, which he hasn't announced yet.
If true, that would effectively minimize the GOP advantage. Because of this -- and because an earlier special election might have a lower turnout -- it would give Dems a shot at winning that special contest.
And guess what -- it looks as if the Mississippi Secretary of State has confirmed that the special election is in fact supposed to happen 90 days after Lott's resignation date -- and not in 2008, as Barbour is claiming.
National Dems say that Barbour is ignoring election law to rig the game in their favor -- and that an earlier contest would play to their advantage. "Republicans clearly know they will have a very hard time holding this seat if they election is held in 90 days," a national Dem strategist tells TPM Election Central. "They get ugly when their backs are to the wall, and Barbour is just doing what they always try to do -- bending the law to suit their purposes."
more...
http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2007/11/after_lott_special_election_should_actually_be_held_in_90_days_dems_say.php