|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 03:08 PM Original message |
Which one of these endorsements will benefit the candidate most: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
1. Definitely Oprah for Obama. Oprah has crossover appeal.Streisand hurts Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 03:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Oprah for Obama -- I totally agree with saracat's reasoning. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
3. Gore (if he endorses anybody) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 03:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. What about the three in the OP? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 03:29 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. O for O probably helps most |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tejanocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
4. Jackson'll make a difference in the South Carolina primary. Oprah'd make a diffence in the general |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
5. This one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 03:26 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Just look at all the people money can buy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 03:33 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. selective outrage much? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 03:36 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. What? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 03:35 PM Response to Reply #6 |
16. Most of those people have more integrity in their pinky finger than you do in your body |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 03:40 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. And what in the hell do you know about my integrity? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 03:48 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. I know that anybody who accuses Maya Angelou & over a dozen civil rights leaders of accepting bribes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 03:53 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. And I could say anyone that supports a hawk doesn't have much integrity either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 03:54 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. You're not too good at the whole deflection thing. Haven't the other JE supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 04:00 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. What in the hell does that mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 04:02 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Why are you crying about being "personally insulted" after personally attacking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 04:18 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Perfect, when Maya shows up, I'll apologize to her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 04:31 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. DO you think Rep John Lewis took a bribe? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 04:52 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Perhaps, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 04:56 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. If you post baseless accusations, the integrity of those posts can be called into question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 05:24 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. This is what I'm talking about, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 05:56 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. I'm sorry but it's not about the exact words you used |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 06:11 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. It's time to put up or shut up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-28-07 07:43 AM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Looks like he chose to shut up. How typical. n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 03:27 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Wow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 03:28 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. wow, look at that slew of backbencher endorsements, wowee.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 03:35 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. back benchers? A lot of them sure aren't. Like it or not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cuke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 04:32 PM Response to Reply #15 |
30. Ignored thinks John Lewis is a backbencher? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
11. Al Gore and John Kerry are the brass rings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 03:33 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. That's a good point Ruck! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
14. I gotta go with Oprah- by a mile. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
24. His dog for Romney? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
25. What has Steisand been up to lately? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CyberPieHole (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
27. Bill Clinton for Hillary Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 08:53 PM Response to Reply #27 |
38. Even bigger, Bill Clinton for anyone other than HRC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
28. Ha ha ha there go those Obama groupies trying to play down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
33. This is childish. They are all great endorsements. And they are all polarizing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-27-07 05:47 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Childish? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC