Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP,pg1: Foes Use Obama's Muslim Ties to Fuel Rumors About Him

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 12:24 PM
Original message
WP,pg1: Foes Use Obama's Muslim Ties to Fuel Rumors About Him
Foes Use Obama's Muslim Ties to Fuel Rumors About Him
By Perry Bacon Jr.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, November 29, 2007; Page A01

In his speeches and often on the Internet, the part of Sen. Barack Obama's biography that gets the most attention is not his race but his connections to the Muslim world.

Since declaring his candidacy for president in February, Obama, a member of a congregation of the United Church of Christ in Chicago, has had to address assertions that he is a Muslim or that he had received training in Islam in Indonesia, where he lived from ages 6 to 10. While his father was an atheist and his mother did not practice religion, Obama's stepfather did occasionally attend services at a mosque there.

Despite his denials, rumors and e-mails circulating on the Internet continue to allege that Obama (D-Ill.) is a Muslim, a "Muslim plant" in a conspiracy against America, and that, if elected president, he would take the oath of office using a Koran, rather than a Bible, as did Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), the only Muslim in Congress, when he was sworn in earlier this year.

In campaign appearances, Obama regularly mentions his time living and attending school in Indonesia, and the fact that his paternal grandfather, a Kenyan farmer, was a Muslim. Obama invokes these facts as part of his case that he is prepared to handle foreign policy, despite having been in the Senate for only three years, and that he would literally bring a new face to parts of the world where the United States is not popular....

***

Obama aides sharply disputed the initial stories suggesting that he was a Muslim, and in Iowa, the campaign keeps a letter at its offices, signed by five members of the local clergy, vouching for the candidate's Christian faith....

***

A CBS News poll in August showed that a huge number of voters said they did not know Obama's faith, but among those who said they did, 7 percent thought he was a Muslim, while only 6 percent thought he was a Protestant Christian....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/28/AR2007112802757_2.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Has he stopped roasting Christian babies on a spit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. A disgusting display by the Washington Post.

Washington Post: The New Drudge?

by BarbinMD
Thu Nov 29, 2007 at 01:47:36 AM PST

Yesterday, Politico's Ben Smith nailed Rudy Giuliani for nailing his mistress on the taxpayer's dime. And in today's Washington Post, what kind of coverage does this major, investigative piece receive? Three sentences buried in the middle of their debate coverage. So, what is their big story of the day?

Foes Use Obama's Muslim Ties to Fuel Rumors About Him


Yes, a front page story about rumors.

Despite his denials, rumors and e-mails circulating on the Internet continue to allege that Obama (D-Ill.) is a Muslim, a "Muslim plant" in a conspiracy against America...


Actually, calling them rumors gives them too much credence. It would be more accurate to call them blatant lies, yet the Washington Post has decided to give them a national platform. The only thing missing from this story is the siren at the top of the page.

But the dishonestly doesn't just rest with the people who spread these stories, the Washington Post is just as guilty. They "report" that:

Another e-mail, on a site called Snopes.com that tracks Internet rumors, starts, "Be careful, be very careful." It notes that "Obama takes great care to conceal the fact that he is a Muslim," and that "since it is politically expedient to be a Christian when you are seeking political office in the United States, Obama joined the United Church of Christ to help purge any notion that he is still a Muslim."


This is immediately followed with a line about a CBS poll that showed, "a huge number of voters said they did not know Obama's faith." What the Washington Post didn't bother to address? What Snopes.com had to say about the story:

Claim: Illinois senator Barack Obama is a, "radical, ideological Muslim."

Status: False.


But to be fair, the Washington Post did provide a named source who was willing to back up his claims:

Bryan Keelin of Charleston, S.C., who works with an organization of churches there, posted on an Internet board his suspicion that Obama is a Muslim. "I assume his father instructed him on the ways of being a Muslim," said Keelin, who described himself in an interview as a conservative Republican who will vote for former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee.


Well, there you go. If Bryan assumes something, it must be newsworthy. Kudos to the Washington Post for their hard-hitting, investigative journalism.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/11/29/4528/1115
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I had objections to the article myself -- but usually post without comment...
and see what others here think. Thanks so much for posting the Kos piece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I know. I do the same thing. I don't post my own commentary usually when I post an article.
I had seen the Daily Kos post this morning - it was front paged on DK. I know Talking Points Memo also had something.

It is a strange article. They just talk about the rumors and don't really mention that they have been debunked. They just say Obama denied it but don't add that others have investigated and found them to be smears as well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Here is another DU thread just posted - CBS has jumped on with the Wash Post slime wagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Thanks, Pirate! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. That takes some pretzel machinations to call it "Muslim ties."
Edited on Thu Nov-29-07 02:17 PM by AtomicKitten
Effin Media Heathers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. This article is a shabby-ass smear disguised s journalism. It's the swift-boat thing all over again
Someone lies about you. You deny it. The press "wisely" assumes the truth must be in the middle.

That is just what they did with Kerry and the swift-boaters... telling both sides of a story with only one side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. "Foes"???
Or "republicans"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. Guliani is taking money from actual terrorists and that un quotable rag
is reporting on this bullshit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. and what is the best way to respond?
I think exactly the same tactic that is used against Fox. The position should be it is not a reputable news organization, list examples not germain to the discussion and move on. Conservative arrogantly got away with the technique on the Dan Rather AWOL memo. The memo was fake, everything else can't be true. We have much more ammo but discussing the details allows them to continue the spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC