Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Washington Post reported only Obama's denials of madrassa smear, not media debunkings

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 03:28 PM
Original message
Washington Post reported only Obama's denials of madrassa smear, not media debunkings
http://mediamatters.org/items/200711290005?f=h_latest

Wash. Post's Bacon reported only Obama's denials of madrassa smear, not media debunkings

In a November 29 front-page article on how Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) "has had to address assertions that he is a Muslim or that he had received training in Islam in Indonesia, where he lived from ages 6 to 10," Washington Post staff writer Perry Bacon Jr. reported that an "early rumor about Obama's faith came from Insight, a conservative online magazine. The Insight article said Obama had 'spent at least four years in a so-called madrassa, or Muslim seminary, in Indonesia' " . But rather than citing the investigative reports by CNN, the Associated Press, and ABC News conclusively debunking the smear, or providing his own reporting on whether the school Obama attended was, in fact, a madrassa, Bacon reported only that "Obama denied the rumor." CBSNews.com featured the Post article as the top story on its home page during the afternoon of November 29. Beneath a picture of Obama, the headline read "Obama Dogged By Muslim Rumors," with the accompanying text: "Washington Post: Foes Use Candidate's Muslim Ties To Fuel Speculation About His Faith."

Further, while Bacon reported that Obama is "a member of a congregation of the United Church of Christ in Chicago," "has actively touted his Christianity" during his presidential campaign, and recently told an Iowa audience, "If I were a Muslim, I would let you know," the article never definitively stated that claims that Obama was once a Muslim have been discredited. Bacon later reported:

Another e-mail, on a site called Snopes.com that tracks Internet rumors, starts, "Be careful, be very careful." It notes that "Obama takes great care to conceal the fact that he is a Muslim," and that "since it is politically expedient to be a Christian when you are seeking political office in the United States, Obama joined the United Church of Christ to help purge any notion that he is still a Muslim."

In writing that the email "notes that 'Obama takes great care to conceal the fact that he is a Muslim,' " Bacon implied that this allegation is true. In fact, as Daily Kos contributor BarbinMD pointed out, Snopes.com listed this email as an example of allegations that "Barack Obama is 'a radical, ideological Muslim,' " a smear that Snopes.com notes is "alse." Indeed, as Media Matters for America noted, a March 25 Chicago Tribune article reported that "nterviews with dozens of former classmates, teachers, neighbors and friends show that Obama was not a regular practicing Muslim when he was in Indonesia."

more...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm on the comments page for this article at WaPo right now
There's over 450 comments, about 99% rabidly, outrageously against Perry Bacon's little screed.

At least they're hearing it from the crowd. Assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Seriously, the RWers are setting up to make Obama's Muslim heritage an electability issue..
if he should win the nomination. This is going to be a huge problem for Dem voters who are sick of losing. I can't confidently say, there is a way around this issue that would have the necessary elements of convincabilty to put Obama's heritage to rest. Also, Obama isn't helping himself by stating he would "hire" Al Gore or Bill Clinton.

The question begs...Why do we need to hire Clinton, when we get him anyway when his wife wins the election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. just compare their coverage of Dimson during the primaries...just compare
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC