Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Univ. Of Iowa Dorms Won't Be Open For Caucus — Which Dem Benefits?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 12:42 PM
Original message
Univ. Of Iowa Dorms Won't Be Open For Caucus — Which Dem Benefits?
Univ. Of Iowa Dorms Won't Be Open For Caucus — Which Dem Benefits?
By Eric Kleefeld - December 3, 2007, 12:00PM

A new wild card has opened up in the Iowa Democratic caucus: The University of Iowa won't be keeping the dormitories open for the winter holiday. This is the first time the caucus is being held during the break, and this decision means that a lot of students who would have wanted to participate in either party's caucus will be left out.

One might initially think this is bad news for Barack Obama — after all, he's relying on heavy support from students — but on closer inspection it's actually a wild card that could help or hurt any of the candidates, and in fact stands to reward whoever has the strongest organization among students. Check after the jump for a full explanation.

Counter-intuitively, this does not lessen the power of student areas in the caucus. Caucus participants actually vote for delegates to the state Dem convention, where the presidential delegates will then be picked. Those state delegates are apportioned according to a function of population and Democratic performance in the area — and it has nothing to do with how many people actually show up on caucus night. As such, the power of student areas will remain the same even as the number of people participating in the caucus falls.

The bottom line: Those students who do show up will have a disproportionately heavy weight when they vote, given their expected low overall turnout — which means the campaigns will likely work to find their supporters some temporary lodging if they have to. And whoever can pull that trick off really stands to benefit.

http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2007/12/univ_of_iowa_dorms_wont_be_open_for_caucus_who_benefits.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. How was the January 3 date selected? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Because everyone was moving up their caucus and election dates
to challenge Iowa and NH. So IA and NH moved up too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Everyone being Nevada (1/19) and South Carolina (1/29)? nt
Classes resume at University of Iowa January 20.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's weird
I read recently the colleges were planning to open the dorms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bus 'em in AND put them up?
gobama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Shut 'em out and deny their franchisement.
nohill...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. They can put them selves up.
To pay for housing is tantamount to a bribe. Would even YOU condone this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Is anyone doing this?
Edited on Mon Dec-03-07 12:56 PM by Bleachers7
:shrug:

Also, campaigns have campaign housing for volunteers. It would be naive to not think that everyone is going to get as many votes as legally possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Not as of yet, but the OP seems to think that would be OK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. It is OK for everyone legally eligible to vote to vote.
This is a fake crisis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ilovesunshine Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm sure many will open their homes to them.
Are they normally closed during this time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. Edwards benefits, Obama gets hurt.
I was reading an article on Politico that suggested Edwards wasn't connecting with youth voters, and polls show he is failing to capture their attention and support. So if this happens, Obama will be hurt and Edwards could possibly benefit.

Why would this university close and let it's students be left out of the caucus?

Weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-03-07 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. When I lived in IA as a student I didn't find many other students to be very politically active
I didn't know too many that participated in the caucuses when I was there. I was in Ames though, which is a lot more conservative. U of I is known for being much more 'left'. To give some perspective though, I should mention that Iowa is a lot more to the left compared to when I lived there. While I was there repubs had the Gov, House and Senate. Now it's reversed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC