Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

North Carolina Poll: Clinton 31, Edwards 26, Obama 24

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 05:49 PM
Original message
North Carolina Poll: Clinton 31, Edwards 26, Obama 24
Edited on Tue Dec-04-07 05:53 PM by WesDem

Public Policy Polling MOE 3.7%


Hillary Clinton 31
John Edwards 26
Barack Obama 24
Other 12
Undecided 8

Hillary Clinton regains the lead in North Carolina after being tied with John Edwards last month but the most noteworthy thing from this poll is Barack Obama's strongest performance since July, mirroring the trends in key primary states showing the race for the Democratic nomination tightening.

Obama's strongest performance across the state comes in the Triangle where he leads the way with the support of 31% of respondents. Obama's showing comes after a public appearance at North Carolina Central University in Durham last month.

Clinton leads among female voters, Edwards leads among white voters and male voters, and Obama leads among black voters. Edwards earned the support of only 3% of black respondents.

Regionally, Clinton leads the Charlotte area and SE North Carolina, Edwards leads the Triad and the Mountains, and Obama leads the Triangle and NE North Carolina.


http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com/2007/12/democratic-tracking-poll-president.html


Polling data pdf:

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_120407.pdf



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Edwards earned the support of only 3% of black respondents.
The reason HRC is attacking Obama is because she would prefer to see Edwards win Iowa and emerge as her number one challenger... If it works it's a great strategy...


That being said, I think it's risky... I would compare and contrast myself with my opponents and not go negative...Hillary can't afford , imho, to make this race a referendum on her...

Risky...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yeah, it seems that way to me
I've wondered if she's risking the black vote, too. So many black voters really stepped up for her and if they become uncomfortable over attacks on Obama, they may feel the need to rally around him. But I think her strategy of not weakening Edwards in Iowa is what she has to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. But If Edwards Wins IA He Will Get The Blame For Derailing Obama Not Hillary
Edited on Tue Dec-04-07 06:23 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
They won't rememember why he lost... They will just remember who beat him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. You got that right
Edited on Tue Dec-04-07 06:56 PM by WesDem
But it won't matter to Hillary. She'd still be the one with the long leads and he'd still be the one with no money. Pissed off Obama supporters in that scenario might turn on him. I doubt losing Iowa to Edwards would derail Obama, though. It just brings him down a peg. He can take it longer and farther than Edwards can, unless Edwards got a Kerry-like tailwind out of Iowa and I just don't see that coming this time around. There's too much of a bunch-up at the top and I think one or two of the second tier might come in up there, too. I don't expect a surprise ending this time, unless something truly, majorly disastrous happens to one of the top three. We'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I'd agree. If Obama wins IA, he's got a shot. If JE wins IA, HRC reloads, wins NH, and goes on to
secure the nomination by Super Tuesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Edwards can't even win his own homestate.
Some Lion of the South he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Didnt we learn that lesson in the last election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I Want To Hear What His Supporters Have To Say
How can you lose your own state in a primary and put yourself forward as a credible candidate...


Maybe they will refer to that three month old Oklahoma Survey USA poll showing him doing better than Clinton and Obama...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Counting chickens, are we?
He hasn't lost yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Have any votes been cast yet?
Didn't think so. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. This continues to be an embarassment for Edwards
He would be very hard not to support if he could guarantee his home state in the general. But he added nothing there in 2004 and he consistently trails in his own party this time around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. It's not only that,
but he's also taking public financing. When even kos goes after him on that, you know it could be a serious problem for us if he's the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Gore-Lieberman And Kerry-Edwards Both Got 43% Of The NC Vote
He added nothing to the ticket!

Given the "relative" closeness of FL Kerry might have been better off taking Bob Graham...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Any VP pick that doesn't at least let you hold a winnable state is a mistake
Few people thought NC was winnable, and Edwards bore that out. Terrible pick by Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-04-07 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. Talk of Edwards having the "broadest appeal" seems to me rather insulting
Edited on Tue Dec-04-07 06:53 PM by Occam Bandage
to the South and Interior West. "Sure, he's trailing Clinton or Obama in every state, but...*whispers*...well, just look at him. Compared to Hillary or Obama, he just...looks more like someone they'd accept, that's all. Well, yeah, Obama has the highest positives among Republicans, but...the red states might not be ready for him. Edwards, though. White guy. Talks like a southerner or something. They'll eat it up."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC