A repost to debunk something posted here again after already being debunked.

on edit, not you, Obama.

I don't know how I would have voted, but from my vantage point...


please

and you are more than willing to run with the misrepresentation, that very misrepresentation that Media Matters called bullshit on. And I'm calling bullshit on your lame line of attack on Obama. I realize you're feeling kinda shitty about now, but resurrecting stuff like this that has been already called out by Media Matters is pretty sleazy.

Was there much difference between him and bush on Iraq? He said there wasn't. Did he have his fingers crossed?

He said there was room for disagreement on the vote for the IWR. Did he mean that, or did he issue an immediate withdrawl of the comment?

Really, and I'm feeling rather shitty about now?

something that you clearly don't get or don't want to get, so I'll put you down on the side of the Media Heathers when it suits your purpose. Got it.

best of luck to you

Cherry picking sentences out of paragraphs. That can easily go against you.

pretend didn't exist.

Thanks for the words of caution, but yes, I would like this man asking me to allow him to serve me as my president to be held accountable for his words and actions, and I would like to see some of his ardent supporters not try to run away from or try to bury his own words. And at the very least not condem other candidates for things he has a mixed, at best, record on.


If he's the political messiah some seem to think, he can withstand the scrutiny, and if not, then he should be shown for who he really is. Whoever the real Obama is, he's definitely not above questioning, or being held to account. We've already got a guy who thinks he's above question, we sure don't need another one

;)