Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

May I suggest a GD:GE2004 Forum be started soon?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
gardenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 09:42 PM
Original message
May I suggest a GD:GE2004 Forum be started soon?
Edited on Sun Feb-22-04 09:47 PM by mgdecombe
The Nader threads are not productive in the discussion of the remaining Primary candidates.

Nader is not a Democrat, and the Primary we are interested in is the Democratic Primary.

Nader is declaring for the GE, and therefore discussion of Nader and his candidacy belongs there.

I reiterate that in my opinion, any such discussion should be limited to the Nader candidacy as it relates to the future Democratic nominee, just as discussion of Bush is so limited.

We do not tolerate Bush supporters on this forum. I suggest that anyone running as an oponent of the Democratic nominee be given equal treatment in the DU rulebook.

Edited for spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree.
That way I could ignore the whole Forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hooray!
I got so discouraged today that I considered leaving DU--and I've been coming here since the earliest days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MurikanDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Unfortunately, it won't happen till the nominee is selected
We'll have to put up with it till then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gardenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Why is that? Did I miss something? eom
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MurikanDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Once the nominee is selected, people won't be able to promote
3rd Party candidates anymore.

SPECIAL GUIDELINES RELATING TO THE 2004 ELECTION

Perhaps the most critical question currently facing progressives is who should receive the Democratic nomination for president in 2004. In order to encourage a robust and thoughtful debate on this topic, we are instituting a few simple guidelines.

Negative attacks are an unavoidable part of any political campaign, and therefore they are permitted against any Democratic presidential candidate. However, once the Democratic party officially nominates its candidate for president, then the time for fighting is over and the negative attacks against candidates must stop. The administrators of this website do not wish for our message board to be used as a platform to attack and tear down the only progressive on the planet with any hope of defeating George W. Bush. Constructive criticism and even outright disappointment with the candidate may be expressed, but partisan negative attacks will not be welcome. If you wish to contribute to the defeat of the Democratic candidate for president, then you are welcome to use someone else's bandwidth on some other website. As the election season draws closer, we may expand this rule to include Democratic candidates for other political offices.

Democratic Underground may not be used for political organizing activity by supporters of any political party other than the Democratic party. Supporters of certain other political parties may use Democratic Underground for limited partisan activities in political races where there is no Democratic party candidate.

Your may not use your signature line to attack any Democrat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Yeah, you've missed that we don't have a nominee yet
Boy, some Kerry supporters sure are counting their chickens.

Amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gardenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Wow. No chicken counting here,
just a desire to focus on the DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY.

Campaigning for the GE has obviously begun in the GOP camp, and now in the Nader camp.

I was asking for clarification, not counting any chickens.

Further, I supported Dean with all my heart, donated everything I could, and only began supporting Kerry after Dean pulled out of the race.

Sorry, but I don't deserve this snarky response to a request for information.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MurikanDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. You won't get anything but snarly or snarky from her.
You see, it's our fault that Dean squandered his war chest at the same time he fell flat on his face in Iowa. It's also our fault that more people voted for Kerry than Dean, and that polls in other states show more of the same, and therefore Kerry is the nominee apparent. It's our fault that Dean fell off his throne after a year of press crowning him the inevitable nominee.

It's a conspiracy. Kerry supporters at DU were in on it. Now you are part of the conspiracy too.

Focus on the DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY?? *gasp* Sacrilege! :spank:

What do you think this is anyway? A primary forum?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gardenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I can't go all the way with you on that.
I know few Dean supporters who subscribe to the view you satirize in your first paragraph. I also don't want to be lumped in with others who have, let's face it, dogged Dean from the beginning. Kerry has benefited from adopting many of Dean's successful strategies. A little gratitude would be nice, or at least a little understanding that people are wounded here, and lashing out.

My response was directed to Eloriel, who misread me, and my post. I'd prefer to straighten it out between us.

Now, the last part of your post, I'm all the way there with you on that one, Murikan! (And I like your screen name, too.)

Consider me a Kerry supporter who has weighed the odds. I feel it's my duty to get behind the eventual winner of the nomination, and if the winds change, and that means Edwards, my wagon circles around him. I'm about defending the eventual nominee from Bush attacks, and tearing down Bush every chance I get. So, in that sense, I wouldn't call us compatriots. But we're heading down the same path together, and might be able to help each other out. We're all in dire straits, and I'll be damned if I see what happened in our beautiful state of CA happen in the rest of the country.

We lost in CA because we couldn't rally around either Davis or Bustamente. We were Dems in limbo. No more limbo for me. Now that Dean has left the race, anyone who goes after either Kerry or Edwards, and by association, anyone who supports Nader, is my enemy. In that sense, yes, we are part of the same conspiracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MurikanDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Point taken
I wasn't referring to all Dean supporters, but only to Eloriel. My observations agree with yours, as I note only a small but vocal minority of Dean supporters who behave .. well ... you know. Also, I wasn't around here until shortly before the Iowa Primary, and then only reading till I joined a couple weeks later. So I'm not aware of or part of what took place prior to 6 or 7 weeks ago.

We are indeed compatriots as far as circling the wagons around the nominee. If that designation should go to Edwards I'll be behind him 100%. Nader is the opposition - no different than Bush, and in some ways worse.

You're from Calif - ugh - what a nightmare that was to witness. It's just unbelievable they could pull the Governorship out from under Davis like that. Repubs will stop at nothing.

Cheers :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gardenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Thanks! Wow, you missed all the fun!
There was a really wonderful energy here in the early days of the Dean campaign. Wish you had been able to see it.

Anyhow, yeah, we're all in the same boat now, eh?

The thing about CA was, the Democratic Party was in total disarray here. I called the state headquarters and said I was a concerned Dem, and wanted to jump in feet first to help out. Just tell me what to do. They hemmed and hawed and said that they hadn't decided who we should back. It was a total joke. This was 6 weeks before the election. So it wasn't really the Repugs, at least not all of it. It was the Dem party staring at its navel and paralyzed by its own leaders. Feinstein really let us all down by not being a clear leader, and by not running for Gov. (Oh, a preventative measure here...Yeah, yeah, she was IWR, whatever...she's a goddam Dem, not a robogropper who now thinks he should be allowed to run for Pres. in 2008.)

I don't want to see that kind of debacle happen again with a divided Dem party. No matter how much I loved Dean, and what he stood for, he has told us himself that he has dropped out. It is, indeed, very sadly, over.

I'll put it this way, I dated Dean, am looking at a shotgun wedding with Kerry, and Edwards has been sending me flowers. But guess who I think about at night when I'm all alone. But a girl's gotta move on...

Anyhow, glad to meet you!

:toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. maybe prohibit Nader, we're still in primary season
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gardenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I'd prefer not to prohibit discussion of Nader,
just to channel it in a way that meets the mission of DU. Which is to promote Democratic values, and to generate meaningful discussion which supports the election of Democrats to public office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. I agree
And I think the technical point is a good one, that in fact Nader is not running for the Democratic primary nomination. But if the proposal isn't accepted, one thing to do is put those Nader/third party folks who start many threads on the subject on ignore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gardenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I was hoping to avoid the "ignore" solution
I've never put a thread or any poster on "ignore".

I also don't believe in "anonymous" posting, that's why I use my first two initials and my last name.

I understand that others have good reason, though, to post anonymously.

Here's hoping the mods come up with a good solution. They always have, in my experience. Just need to give it time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I never used the ignore feature until Nader threads kept poping up.
Edited on Sun Feb-22-04 10:55 PM by brainshrub
I think I have 20+ of them now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I just hide everythread with what's-his-name in the title
and it's a whole lot more than 20, lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC