House expected to approve $70B for wars
House to Vote on $70B for Iraq and Afghanistan in Bitter Blow to Anti-War Democrats
ANDREW TAYLOR
AP News
Dec 19, 2007 12:46 EST
The Democratic-controlled House is expected to give President Bush an end-of-session victory in his yearlong battle with anti-war lawmakers over Iraq by approving $70 billion for U.S. military operations there and in Afghanistan. The vote Wednesday also would represent the final step in sealing a deal between Democrats and Bush over how much money to provide domestic agencies whose budgets are set each year by Congress. The Iraq funds have been bundled with an omnibus appropriations measure to create a massive $555 billion package that Bush has signaled he will sign.
Providing the war funds was a bitter pill for most Democrats, who on Monday sent the Senate a bill limited to $31 billion for U.S. operations in Afghanistan, which have much broader support than the unpopular mission in Iraq.
"This is a blank check," complained Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass. "The new money in this bill represents one cave-in too many. It is an endorsement of George Bush's policy of endless war."The earlier effort to only fund Afghanistan operations was doomed in the face of a Bush veto promise and a filibuster by Senate Republicans. The Senate rewrote the measure Tuesday night by a bipartisan tally and dropped the combined Iraq and Afghanistan funding in the House's lap as one of the last votes before most senators left Washington for the year.
http://www.rawstory.com/news/mochila/House_expected_to_approve_70B_for_w_12192007.htmlCongress Will Not Give the President a Blank Check
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi | Statement
Tuesday 01 May 2007 Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and Democratic leaders responded to President Bush's veto of the Iraq Supplemental bill today. Below are her remarks:
"Thank you, Mr. Leader.
"Earlier today, the Leader and I sent to the President a bill that made a strong commitment to support our men and women in uniform, and a strong commitment to honor our promises to our veterans. This was a bill that was worthy of the sacrifice of our men and women in uniform.
"It was a bill that honored and respected the wishes of the American people to have benchmarks, to have guidelines, to have standards for what is happening in Iraq. Again, out of respect for the wishes of the American people.
"We had hoped the President would have treated it with the respect that bipartisan legislation supported overwhelmingly by the American people deserved. Instead, the President vetoed the bill outright and, frankly, misrepresented what this legislation does.
"This bill supports the troops. In fact, it gives the President more than he asked for for our troops; they deserve it. They have done their duties excellently; they have done everything that has been asked of them, all of this without, in some cases, the training, the equipment, and a plan for success for them.
"The President wants a blank check. The Congress is not going to give it to him. "The President said, in his comments, that he did not believe in timelines and he spoke out very forcefully against them. Yet, in 1999, on June 5, then Governor Bush said about President Clinton, 'I think it's also important for the President to lay out a timetable as to how long they will be involved and when they will be withdrawn.'
"Despite his past statements, President Bush refuses to apply the same standards to his own activities. Standards, that's the issue.
"If the President thinks that what is happening on the ground in Iraq now is progress, as he said in his comments tonight, it is clear to see why we have a disagreement on policy with him.
"I agree with Leader Reid, we look forward to working with the President to find common ground. But there is great distance between us right now."
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/050207K.shtml