Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No More Blank Checks For Bush UPDATE: "House expected to approve $70B for wars"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 03:54 PM
Original message
No More Blank Checks For Bush UPDATE: "House expected to approve $70B for wars"
House expected to approve $70B for wars

House to Vote on $70B for Iraq and Afghanistan in Bitter Blow to Anti-War Democrats

ANDREW TAYLOR
AP News

Dec 19, 2007 12:46 EST

The Democratic-controlled House is expected to give President Bush an end-of-session victory in his yearlong battle with anti-war lawmakers over Iraq by approving $70 billion for U.S. military operations there and in Afghanistan. The vote Wednesday also would represent the final step in sealing a deal between Democrats and Bush over how much money to provide domestic agencies whose budgets are set each year by Congress. The Iraq funds have been bundled with an omnibus appropriations measure to create a massive $555 billion package that Bush has signaled he will sign.

Providing the war funds was a bitter pill for most Democrats, who on Monday sent the Senate a bill limited to $31 billion for U.S. operations in Afghanistan, which have much broader support than the unpopular mission in Iraq.

"This is a blank check," complained Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass. "The new money in this bill represents one cave-in too many. It is an endorsement of George Bush's policy of endless war."

The earlier effort to only fund Afghanistan operations was doomed in the face of a Bush veto promise and a filibuster by Senate Republicans. The Senate rewrote the measure Tuesday night by a bipartisan tally and dropped the combined Iraq and Afghanistan funding in the House's lap as one of the last votes before most senators left Washington for the year.

http://www.rawstory.com/news/mochila/House_expected_to_approve_70B_for_w_12192007.html



Congress Will Not Give the President a Blank Check
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi | Statement

Tuesday 01 May 2007


Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and Democratic leaders responded to President Bush's veto of the Iraq Supplemental bill today. Below are her remarks:

"Thank you, Mr. Leader.

"Earlier today, the Leader and I sent to the President a bill that made a strong commitment to support our men and women in uniform, and a strong commitment to honor our promises to our veterans. This was a bill that was worthy of the sacrifice of our men and women in uniform.

"It was a bill that honored and respected the wishes of the American people to have benchmarks, to have guidelines, to have standards for what is happening in Iraq. Again, out of respect for the wishes of the American people.

"We had hoped the President would have treated it with the respect that bipartisan legislation supported overwhelmingly by the American people deserved. Instead, the President vetoed the bill outright and, frankly, misrepresented what this legislation does.

"This bill supports the troops. In fact, it gives the President more than he asked for for our troops; they deserve it. They have done their duties excellently; they have done everything that has been asked of them, all of this without, in some cases, the training, the equipment, and a plan for success for them.

"The President wants a blank check. The Congress is not going to give it to him.

"The President said, in his comments, that he did not believe in timelines and he spoke out very forcefully against them. Yet, in 1999, on June 5, then Governor Bush said about President Clinton, 'I think it's also important for the President to lay out a timetable as to how long they will be involved and when they will be withdrawn.'

"Despite his past statements, President Bush refuses to apply the same standards to his own activities. Standards, that's the issue.

"If the President thinks that what is happening on the ground in Iraq now is progress, as he said in his comments tonight, it is clear to see why we have a disagreement on policy with him.

"I agree with Leader Reid, we look forward to working with the President to find common ground. But there is great distance between us right now."

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/050207K.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. So, Nancy, I guess this means your word is worth NOTHING.
You are no better than Bush.

You are giving him a blank check, and you are furthering the war by doing so. The blood of our dead troops is on your hands, too.

Impeachment is off the table, but apparently war is the main course.

You are a disgrace, Speaker Pelosi. Your word is worthless, and your performance as Speaker of the House is unacceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. HOO-AH! We should paint Pelosi's name on every bomb and bullet.
There's no way we could continue out illegal and immoral war without the help of the esteemed congresswoman from California. Thanks, Nancy!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC