|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 06:27 PM Original message |
Fmr. Clinton Secretary of Labor Robert Reich: "Krugman, the Times Oped Page, and Obama" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
1. Wow 3 whole attacks in 2 months! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 06:37 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Children have no protection against negligent parents, whereas adults can make their own decisions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 06:39 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. What strawman? Reich claims people will not be able to pay for mandated coverage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 06:55 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. Reich says Obama's healthcare plan is better than Hillary's for this very reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 06:57 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. So how can they afford to pay for Obama's mandated coverage for children? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:01 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. Childrens insurance is the cheapest product out there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:06 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. If it were the cheapest product out there, some 10 million children would not be uninsured. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:12 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Ugh...if there was an effort to first bring down the cost, subsidize it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:26 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. So why not apply the same logic to more than children? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:39 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. Spin it all you want but Hillary's plan is very much like MittCare in Massachusetts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:46 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. So how is it similar to MittCare? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:50 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. It's obvious to anyone who has read the two plans... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 08:04 PM Response to Reply #43 |
48. You made the claim. You demonstrate it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 08:14 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. The Washington Post and Time agree with my assessment. Who agrees with you, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 08:28 PM Response to Reply #51 |
56. A offhand quip that it "looks like" the Mitt plan is your proof? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 08:36 PM Response to Reply #56 |
60. Spinning? My proof is from WaPo AND Time. You said Hillarycare II is not like MittCare. Prove it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 08:38 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. I just offered up some differences. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 08:42 PM Response to Reply #61 |
65. No you did not... you offered ad homenim attacks & your biased opinion that have no basis in fact. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 08:53 PM Response to Reply #65 |
68. Why do you keep attacking Krugman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 09:00 PM Response to Reply #68 |
72. I am telling it like it is ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 09:10 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. I realize that you have to rely on MSM to summarize the plans for you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 09:12 PM Response to Reply #75 |
76. Whereas you have nobody to back up your claim that Hillarycare II "is not like" MittCare? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 09:21 PM Response to Reply #76 |
78. I gave you the info. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 09:36 PM Response to Reply #78 |
83. WaPo and Time both fact checked & concluded Hillarycare II isn't universal & is like MittCare |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 09:44 PM Response to Reply #83 |
86. All your WaPo fact check proved is that they both have mandates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:02 PM Response to Reply #86 |
94. Since you're intent on misrepresenting both fact checks' conclusions, I've excerpted quotes here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:09 PM Response to Reply #94 |
95. Nice selective quoting! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:17 PM Response to Reply #95 |
98. No, the quotes prove your dishonesty regarding the conclusions of the WaPo/Time fact checks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:20 PM Response to Reply #98 |
99. I'm not the one taking quotes out of context. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:25 PM Response to Reply #99 |
103. Again with the dishonesty? The quotes stand alone in refuting your false claims. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:31 PM Response to Reply #103 |
106. Sure I did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:46 PM Original message |
Anyone reading this thread can see the spin you're employing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
115. I provided sources with base info and did my own analysis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 11:02 PM Response to Reply #115 |
120. You provided links to the plans & then offered biased personal opinions instead of sourced analyses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 11:05 PM Response to Reply #120 |
121. Put aside bias, what was wrong with my analysis(beyond its brevity)? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 11:21 PM Response to Reply #121 |
124. I prefer independent fact checks from credible sources to biased blather -- and so do most people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 11:24 PM Response to Reply #124 |
125. Or how about doing one's own investigation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 11:34 PM Response to Reply #125 |
128. You have yet to prove your claim. What is in it for you to persist on this thread in this vein? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 06:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. Four columns plus numerous blogs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 06:55 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Well I think it was a bad idea for the Obama campaign to make it personal with him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 06:59 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:30 PM Response to Reply #19 |
35. More on Krugman v Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:42 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. Jerome Armstrong has been an anti-Obama mouthpiece from Day One |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dems Will Win (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:23 PM Response to Reply #1 |
101. Hillary has lots of Experience: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
2. Krugman is an Op-Ed columnist venting his opinion, repeatedly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 11:54 PM Response to Reply #2 |
132. That's it in a nutshell. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-20-07 12:01 AM Response to Reply #132 |
133. Got home this A.M. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-20-07 12:22 AM Response to Reply #133 |
134. AMEN! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gloria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
3. Krugman is already past healthcare...he's really looking at the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 06:40 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Krugman is also past honestly reporting the facts... what he's doing has nothing to do with policy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elizm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
4. Krugman is backing Edwards...and attacking Obama to help Edwards. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 06:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. He's a Clinton supporter... attacking Obama helps Edwards which helps Hillary (in Iowa) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elizm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 06:52 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Jonathan Alter at Newsweek says he is an Edwards supporter... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 06:57 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Really? That's news to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 06:58 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Seems like a lot is news to you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:15 PM Response to Reply #18 |
29. How typical of Hillaryworld: You're full of childish playground taunts but short of facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:16 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. And who edited their OP with no explanation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:29 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. Um, what's your point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:31 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Or... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:44 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. So, has Hillary revealed how she plans to enforce her mandate yet? What is she hiding? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 09:55 PM Response to Reply #40 |
92. So I guess the or was right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:14 PM Original message |
Do you normally write incoherently incomprehensible one-line replies or am I being unduly honored? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elizm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:10 PM Response to Reply #17 |
27. Alter today... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:25 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. Krugman's first two attack Obama op-eds were strong defenses in Hillary's favor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:33 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. "Only with this week's op-ed has he come out for Edwards more" Bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:47 PM Response to Reply #37 |
42. Anyone who has read Krugman's op-eds knows this is the truth. Your attempt to deny it is telling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 08:11 PM Response to Reply #42 |
50. Hillaryattacks in an ANTI-Hillary site, genius. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 08:51 PM Response to Reply #50 |
66. And you just happen to like to link to there as a bitterly partisan Clintonian, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 08:56 PM Response to Reply #66 |
70. Um, I found that website via google. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 09:06 PM Response to Reply #70 |
74. Sure you did. By the way, do you ever stop with the nasty ad hominem personal attacks? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 09:19 PM Response to Reply #74 |
77. Now we have dishonesty's good buddy, hypocrisy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:10 PM Response to Reply #77 |
96. Nah, those are honest observations shared by most DUers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:14 PM Response to Reply #96 |
97. Yes, nasty personal attacks are just honest observations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:22 PM Response to Reply #97 |
100. Your attempt to spin what I said is another Clintonian attempt at doublespeak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:24 PM Response to Reply #100 |
102. No problem kicking the thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:27 PM Response to Reply #102 |
104. Good, because Robert Reich's smackdown of Krugman's attacks need the exposure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-20-07 01:30 AM Response to Reply #74 |
138. You of all people leveling the "ad hominem personal attacks" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-20-07 01:36 AM Response to Reply #138 |
139. Ah, another voice from the Hillaryworld Hallelujah chorus.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elizm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:53 PM Response to Reply #32 |
44. Maybe tell Krugman to answer Alterman's claim?? :) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 08:01 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. Good idea... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 06:53 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Krugman is a Hillary supporter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:01 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. Yes, he has been very defensive of Hillary in his Obama hit pieces... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:03 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Umm he's defended mandates as a concept, not Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:10 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Wrong... he's repeatedly defended Hillary's healthcare plan after the Las Vegas debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:17 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. Oh this is too easy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:55 PM Response to Reply #31 |
46. HillaryAttacks is another Clinton campaign talking point vehicle. Why do you keep linking to it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 08:09 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. Just when I thought it was too easy, you went ahead & made a fool of yourself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 08:22 PM Response to Reply #49 |
53. Sure, sure, and Krugman isn't a Clinton partisan attack dog... btw, Hillarycare II is NOT UNIVERSAL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 08:34 PM Response to Reply #53 |
58. Ahhhh the sweet taste of victory! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 08:41 PM Response to Reply #58 |
64. What victory? WaPo said Hillarycare II is NOT UNIVERSAL and it is like MittCare in MA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
8. If he can't stand the heat, then he needs to get out of the kitchen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 06:51 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Um, Reich is addressing the lack of merit in Krugman's repeated attacks against Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:00 PM Response to Reply #10 |
20. Former Labor Secretary and he "never implemented any government policy in his life. " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:04 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. You are purposely misrepresenting what I just said to you; read the OP and learn about Reich's work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hayu_lol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 07:54 PM Response to Reply #24 |
45. Lessee if I get this straight... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 08:33 PM Response to Reply #45 |
57. Here's what I have to say... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
52. Krugman's bio is every bit as distinguished as Reich's, if not more so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 08:23 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. Reich has actually accomplished great things in government policymaking under Clinton I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 09:31 PM Response to Reply #54 |
80. If you choose to value policymaking over research achievements |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:32 PM Response to Reply #80 |
107. Um, Krugman has zero experience with policymaking on a federal scale while Reich does |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
springhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-20-07 01:28 AM Response to Reply #54 |
136. Geez, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-20-07 09:42 AM Response to Reply #136 |
144. Bingo (n/t). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 08:24 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. No hands-on public policy experience is the point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 09:34 PM Response to Reply #55 |
81. You choose one career path, but then get criticized for not choosing another? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 09:52 PM Response to Reply #81 |
91. Who cares what career path he has chosen? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 08:36 PM Response to Reply #52 |
59. But he said something bad about Obama, therefore he must be insulted and reviled. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 08:39 PM Response to Reply #59 |
62. Your Hillaryworld hypocrisy is breathtaking. And very very funny for those of us who know you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 08:52 PM Response to Reply #62 |
67. Except I never claimed HillaryCar was nothing like MittCare. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 08:55 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. ZING!! See your reply on this thread #33: "Hillary's plan is not like Massachusetts." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 08:59 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. "Hillary plan is not like Masschusetts" vs " HillaryCare is nothing Like MittCare" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 09:04 PM Response to Reply #71 |
73. Splitting hairs because you're wrong, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 09:22 PM Response to Reply #73 |
79. Yes reading the plans on my own and making my own arguments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 09:38 PM Response to Reply #79 |
85. Oh, and of course we all trust your totally unbiased "arguments" over WaPo and Time fact checks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 09:46 PM Response to Reply #85 |
87. You don;t have to trust me. I provided data to both plans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:36 PM Response to Reply #87 |
108. Anyone can see you've no links to back up your BS claim that HillaryCare II "is not like" MittCare |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:39 PM Response to Reply #108 |
109. Post #75 has the links. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:50 PM Response to Reply #109 |
114. Post #75 offers no links to credible independent analyses to back up your claim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:54 PM Response to Reply #114 |
117. I never said it was indy analysis. I linked to info about the plans themselves. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 11:14 PM Response to Reply #117 |
122. You offered your biased personal opinions but nothing in the way of credibly sourced analyses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 11:18 PM Response to Reply #122 |
123. Too bad you are unable to check up on my "biased personal opinion" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 11:25 PM Response to Reply #123 |
126. I have repeatedly linked to credible fact check sources that give the lie to your bogus claims. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 11:30 PM Response to Reply #126 |
127. Ok show me where in those fact checks they discuss those components? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 11:38 PM Response to Reply #127 |
129. You're now moving the goalposts instead of offering proof of your claims. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 09:36 PM Response to Reply #59 |
84. yes, it's interesting how that works. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 09:48 PM Response to Reply #84 |
88. Oh, stop the sniggering partisan high-fives and read Reich's correction of Krugman dishonest attacks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 09:55 PM Response to Reply #88 |
93. Yes, saying stop insulting Paul Krugman is partisan! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:39 PM Response to Reply #93 |
110. Yes, it is, because only in Hillaryworld does calling Krugman on his BS equal to "insulting" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:49 PM Response to Reply #110 |
113. Shortt list of your actual insults directed towards Krugman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 11:45 PM Response to Reply #113 |
131. Only in Hillaryworld are accurate criticisms of Clintonian BS peddlers considered insults. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-20-07 09:35 AM Response to Reply #88 |
143. Uh, I am an Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 09:49 PM Response to Reply #84 |
89. Its very sad. Some deluded Obama supporters even insisted Krugman's son worked for Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:43 PM Response to Reply #89 |
111. I never did... and what has that got to do with the OP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:46 PM Response to Reply #111 |
112. Just showing the lengths that some Obama supporters are going to while attacking Krugman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:54 PM Response to Reply #112 |
116. Um, according to you... for all I know, it's Clinton staffers making Obama supporters look bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:58 PM Response to Reply #116 |
119. Actually that was according to TPM not me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 11:40 PM Response to Reply #119 |
130. I don't truck in rumormongering like you do. Only in Hillaryworld is that "the fun part" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
63. Thank you, Dr. Reich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
82. Anyone who disagrees with Reich is a conservative!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:57 PM Response to Reply #82 |
118. Yes, that's how it works |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
90. Krugman's simply TELLING THE TRUTH about Obama (particularly his naivity) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-19-07 10:30 PM Response to Reply #90 |
105. Prove it. I believe Bill's Secretary of Labor over you or Krugman any day of the week. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-20-07 01:18 AM Response to Reply #105 |
135. What's to prove? The FACTS are out there for everyone to see for themselves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-20-07 01:29 AM Response to Reply #135 |
137. List them because Robert Reich refutes many of Krugman's arguments and premises |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-20-07 01:43 AM Response to Reply #137 |
140. Just read the articles for yourself! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-20-07 01:50 AM Response to Reply #140 |
141. I did... you're still not offering what "truths" Krugman told about Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-20-07 01:52 AM Response to Original message |
142. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 04:03 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC