Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So I've Been Away Two Weeks, Everyone Has Turned On Barack

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
fightindonkey Donating Member (674 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 04:47 PM
Original message
So I've Been Away Two Weeks, Everyone Has Turned On Barack
Discarding sarcasm, attacks, etc., no matter what side you're on, what happened here? The sense I have gotten is that his massive flipping on the core issues, was the final straw for most voters. Is this what happened here at DL overall?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, it's not.
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nope.
Just a few assholes who can't resist the usual childish name-calling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nailzberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. And a lovely two weeks that was.
You couldn't have waited until after Christmas to resume nastiness?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. lol nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
25. ..
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeyLimeDem Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. He must be the leading then
just like tigers we eat our own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Tigers don't eat their own. Only Democrats do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's crunch time and Obama's flimsy record can't stand up to the recent scrutiny.
To his credit:Mr. Obama can "talk the talk" with the best of them.:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. Yes, BO's Health Care Plan has shall we say, a few worm holes..
Big enough to drive a NOT so "Universal" 18 wheeler through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. I haven't noticed that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hillary was showing weakness and here minions have came to her defense. Nothing less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sultana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. You are a Hillary supporter
nuff said.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. His reign as Iowa/NH frontrunner.
The same reason Hillary got so many bogus arguments thrown at her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. He's fallen off my list due to some incredible hypocritical bullshit over 527s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. I guess extremely hypocritical shit over War is less important to you?
Clinton and Edwards both supported the Iraq War before they were against it.

I think your priorities are more than slightly skewed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Flaking out when a journalist asks if you are prepared to make the same commitment you asked another
candidate to make is hypocritical; voting one way and changing your mind later isn't hypocritical.

Do you not understand that?

Apparently Obama doesn't either.

That's one reason I won't be voting for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. How 'bout Edwards choosing to forego matching funds and then later,
after not raising as much money as Hillary or Obama, claiming he's "choosing" to take matching funds for "moral reasons" and challenging the other 2 to do the same? That's just one example of him being a phony or a liar...or both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. I don't care whether you trash Edwards. Knock yourself out. I'll vote against Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. I'm not trashing Edwards at all. Just stating facts that you obviously can't dispute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. Lots of people fear him, and what his victory in Iowa will do to their candidate's run. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ariesgem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. What the hell are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ThatPoetGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. He swiftboated Krugman.
Krugman wrote an article that pointed out flaws in Obama's healthcare plan. Instead of a rational response addressing the merits of his plan, Obama's website released some nonsense intended to smear Krugman as dishonest. This was KRUGMAN, people!

Krugman defended himself against the smear, and Obama's people used Krugman's self-defense as evidence that Krugman is biased against Obama -- or else Krugman wouldn't have spoken out against Obama's health-care plans again. Now Obama supporters have been working overtime to discredit Krugman as some mindless, dishonest partisan.

Krugman was our eminence grise. He fearlessly confronted Bush and Rove and the right-wing lie machine from the pages of the New York Times, at a time when our politicians, newscasters, and editorialists were cowering in fear. The right-wingers never managed to discredit him, even though they tried: they had private investigators look into his past and follow him around, hoping to uncover some scandal in his past.

Now Obama's supporters have managed to smear him, and I think the effect will last. People -- LIBERALS! -- are saying things like, "Krugman is an Edwards supporter, he just doesn't like Obama." The folks who say this are sick and dumb. Maybe, just maybe, Krugman supports Edwards and Hillary over Obama because he thinks their policy proposals are better?

So yeah, Obama has turned me off. I might stay home on election day if he's our candidate, or just vote for congressional candidates. It's a huge fucking shame when a candidate runs on an empty promise of "hope" while committing character assassination against one of the strongest progressive voices of our time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. So its okay for Edwards to just ride the waves of his closely-tied 527s', who swiftboat also? nm
Edited on Tue Dec-25-07 05:44 PM by TeamJordan23
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThatPoetGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. It's only swiftboating if it isn't true.
I haven't seen the anti-Obama ads, but I've heard that they're vicious and nasty. I don't like vicious and nasty between Democrats. I haven't heard that they spread lies. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong, and I'll retract that.

Also, 527s aren't all the same. MoveOn is a 527. Unions paid for those anti-Obama ads -- hard-working individuals who want their voices to be heard. Painting the unions with the same brush as shadowy right-wing conspiracies isn't ok with me.

Obama's own website spread half-truths and malicious distortions about Paul Krugman with the intent to discredit him. Not to challenge his ideas and his analyses, but to discredit the man himself, so that everything he says is regarded suspiciously. This was vile and vicious and low. I haven't seen a Democrat stoop this low since Robert Gibbs compared Howard Dean to Osama bin Laden.

Gibbs was working for Gephardt and Kerry in 2004. Neither of those men was running a holier-than-thou, look-how-nice-I-am campaign using the language of idealism. It's sickening that Obama, the candidate with the loftiest rhetoric, has done the dirtiest deed of this campaign season.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Obama's FactCheck Website does not attack Krugman personally; just shows his inconsistency
Edited on Tue Dec-25-07 06:38 PM by TeamJordan23
All it does is point out inconsistency in his CONTINOUS criticism of Obama's health care plan. He clearly praised the plan publically in June and now seems to have a personal vendetta against Obama.

All his fact check website does is show the inconsistencies of Krugman on this issue - the health care plan. So you are off base in saying that Obama is attacking Krugman's credibility on all other issues. But Obama is correct in pointing out the irony in Krugman's Obama attacks on his health care plan.


As far as those hard-working 'unions'. Why don't they promote their candidate rather than take vicious attacks another. And if you don't think unions are interest groups themselves, you are living in another planet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Please
Provide a link to any of the ads out by the 527's that are "swiftboating" Oabama, or are negative in any way towards him, PLEASE??????????????

What it looks like to me is a childish act by the "one" who isn't getting any help from the union 527's! I am sure that if there were any 527's out helping Obama, neither him, nor any of his camp would be complaining at all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. How was Krugman "swiftboated"? Can you give me an example?
That term is thrown around a bit too much these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. To me, "swiftboating" and "smears" are either accusations that aren't true, or
are very personal in nature, wouldn't have an impact on the ability to do a job, and put the person's character in doubt--if Obama said Krugman ate roadkill and worshipped Satan, then that would be swiftboating and smearing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. And Alter put Krugman in his place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThatPoetGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. You people are sick.
There is no degree of dishonesty or outrage you will not swallow if the truth contradicts your view of things.

Obama supporters are no different from Bush followers. Keep on riding the Self-Deception Highway.

Krugman stated an intelligent opinion about Obama's plan. Obama's website and his followers began a full-scale assault on Krugman, worse than anything I've seen from Karl Rove. And they never responded to the crux of Krugman's analysis. Why should they, when lying about a man's character will accomplish what they need?

So keep on worshipping your guy. He's to the right of Giuliani and Huckabee on many key issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
28. He's boring
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-25-07 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. You're interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
32. The Obamites' charming technique of smearing Hillary's supporters has backfired. Who woulda thought?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC