Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why'd Hillary, Biden and Dodd vote against Democratic efforts to prohibit cluster bombing civilians?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Tejanocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 12:33 AM
Original message
Why'd Hillary, Biden and Dodd vote against Democratic efforts to prohibit cluster bombing civilians?
Source: http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00232

I've almost come to expect such votes from Hillary and Biden, but why Dodd?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. You are so ignorant... ....................of the facts.
Edited on Fri Dec-28-07 01:29 AM by 1corona4u
Probably because they saw a bad amendment, but passed THIS bill;



H.R.5631
Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2007 (Enrolled as Agreed to or Passed by Both House and Senate)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beginning
DIVISION A--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2007
TITLE I
Reserve Personnel, Navy
Reserve Personnel, Air Force
National Guard Personnel, Air Force
TITLE II
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid
Former Soviet Union Threat Reduction Account
TITLE III
Missile Procurement, Army
Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy
Procurement of Ammunition, Air Force
National Guard and Reserve Equipment
Defense Production Act Purchases
TITLE IV
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army
Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense
TITLE V
REVOLVING AND MANAGEMENT FUNDS
Defense Working Capital Funds
National Defense Sealift Fund
Pentagon Reservation Maintenance Revolving Fund
TITLE VI
Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Army
Office of the Inspector General
TITLE VII
Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System Fund
TITLE VIII
(RESCISSIONS)
TITLE IX
ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS
MILITARY PERSONNEL
Military Personnel, Army
Military Personnel, Navy
Military Personnel, Marine Corps
Military Personnel, Air Force
Reserve Personnel, Army
Reserve Personnel, Marine Corps
National Guard Personnel, Army
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
Operation and Maintenance, Army
Operation and Maintenance, Navy
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force
Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide
Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve
Operation and Maintenance, Navy Reserve
Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps Reserve
Operation and Maintenance, Air Force Reserve
Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard
Operation and Maintenance, Air National Guard
Iraq Freedom Fund
Afghanistan Security Forces Fund
Iraq Security Forces Fund
Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund
PROCUREMENT
Aircraft Procurement, Army
Procurement of Weapons and Tracked Combat Vehicles, Army
Procurement of Ammunition, Army
Other Procurement, Army
Aircraft Procurement, Navy
Weapons Procurement, Navy
Procurement of Ammunition, Navy and Marine Corps
Other Procurement, Navy
Procurement, Marine Corps
Aircraft Procurement, Air Force
Missile Procurement, Air Force
Other Procurement, Air Force
Procurement, Defense-Wide
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide
OTHER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROGRAMS
Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense
RELATED AGENCIES
Intelligence Community Management Account
GENERAL PROVISIONS
(TRANSFER OF FUNDS)
(INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS)
TITLE X
FISCAL YEAR 2006 WILDLAND FIRE EMERGENCY APPROPRIATIONS
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
WILDLAND FIRE MANAGEMENT
DIVISION B--CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS RESOLUTION, 2007


http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c109:7:./temp/~c109zo92zl::



OBVIOUSLY, they didn't agree on the first amendment!!!! Which the vote was 70/30.
You can read the text of it here;





Get a fucking life, will ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well done Sister!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Apparently, Tejano crat thinks we are made of money in this country as well...
Edited on Fri Dec-28-07 01:29 AM by 1corona4u
If you read the amendment, it would have been VERY cost prohibitive, and her amendment, made NO provision for it;



"The Pentagon has argued that adding this device is cost prohibitive. And it may well be.

The amendment of Senator Leahy and myself does not address this issue."


So, maybe Feinstein needs to get her shit together before she submits a BAD, half-assed amendment.

Oh, and another thing, this had nothing to do with US "bombing" anyone. It specifically was to address all of the unspent ammunitions in particular parts of the world.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Then why did Baucus and Conrad vote for it
Baucus is the head of the Finance committee and is extremely well known as a Democratic fiscal conservative. Cluster bombs kill long after wars are over. They also look like toys, thus attracting children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 03:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Thanks for posting this, Corona - my continuing education. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. I always look forward to Tejanocrats daily distortions...don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. As usual, another bullshit post
from the shit stirrer, that gets way more attention than it deserves.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. They voted against an amendment that would have banned Cluster bombs
Edited on Fri Dec-28-07 03:01 PM by karynnj
Your post proves nothing about the amendment and your link doesn't work.

Part of the reason given by Clinton had to do with Israel using them in Lebanon. (Yeah, I know that's a bad reason) Dodd represents Connecticut - so his reason may have been the same. Here is the roll call - it was 70-30 as you said. Look at the yeas - they are basically the normal good guys. AIPAC may have been the reason behind Schumer, Clinton, Dodd and Lautenberg.

Grouped By Vote Position
YEAs ---30
Akaka (D-HI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Byrd (D-WV)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carper (D-DE)
Conrad (D-ND)
Dayton (D-MN)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Harkin (D-IA)
Jeffords (I-VT)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerry (D-MA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Obama (D-IL)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Wyden (D-OR)
NAYs ---70
Alexander (R-TN)
Allard (R-CO)
Allen (R-VA)
Bayh (D-IN)
Bennett (R-UT)
Biden (D-DE)
Bond (R-MO)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burns (R-MT)
Burr (R-NC)
Chafee (R-RI)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Clinton (D-NY)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Coleman (R-MN)
Collins (R-ME)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Craig (R-ID)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
DeWine (R-OH)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dole (R-NC)
Domenici (R-NM)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Frist (R-TN)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hagel (R-NE)
Hatch (R-UT)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Inouye (D-HI)
Isakson (R-GA)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Lott (R-MS)
Lugar (R-IN)
Martinez (R-FL)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Pryor (D-AR)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Salazar (D-CO)
Santorum (R-PA)
Schumer (D-NY)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Smith (R-OR)
Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (R-PA)
Stevens (R-AK)
Sununu (R-NH)
Talent (R-MO)
Thomas (R-WY)
Thune (R-SD)
Vitter (R-LA)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (R-VA)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NI4NI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Feinstein Leahy Amendment DID NOT call for a ban on clusterbombs eotm
Edited on Fri Dec-28-07 04:05 PM by NI4NI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. The amendment votes.
YEAs ---30 (All Dems)

Akaka (D-HI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Byrd (D-WV)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carper (D-DE)
Conrad (D-ND)
Dayton (D-MN)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Harkin (D-IA)
Jeffords (I-VT)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerry (D-MA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Obama (D-IL)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Wyden (D-OR)

NAYs ---70

Alexander (R-TN)
Allard (R-CO)
Allen (R-VA)
Bayh (D-IN)
Bennett (R-UT)
Biden (D-DE)
Bond (R-MO)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burns (R-MT)
Burr (R-NC)
Chafee (R-RI)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Clinton (D-NY)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Coleman (R-MN)
Collins (R-ME)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Craig (R-ID)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
DeWine (R-OH)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dole (R-NC)
Domenici (R-NM)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Frist (R-TN)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hagel (R-NE)
Hatch (R-UT)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Inouye (D-HI)
Isakson (R-GA)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Lott (R-MS)
Lugar (R-IN)
Martinez (R-FL)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Pryor (D-AR)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Salazar (D-CO)
Santorum (R-PA)
Schumer (D-NY)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Smith (R-OR)
Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (R-PA)
Stevens (R-AK)
Sununu (R-NH)
Talent (R-MO)
Thomas (R-WY)
Thune (R-SD)
Vitter (R-LA)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (R-VA)


The original appropriations bill was passed without the cluster bombs amendment which read

SA 4882. Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself and Mr. LEAHY) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by her to the bill H.R. 5631, making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2007, and for other purposes; as follows:

At the end of title VIII, add the following:

Sec. 8109. No funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act my be obligated or expended to acquire, utilize, sell, or transfer any cluster munition unless the rules of engagement applicable to the cluster munition ensure that the cluster munition will not be used in or near any concentrated population of civilians, whether permanent or temporary, including inhabited parts of cities or villages, camps or columns of refugees or evacuees, or camps or groups of nomads.


I'm not sure how that could be read as a "bad amendment".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. Because it would have investigated Israel
and Hillary needs the NY Jewish vote and possible VP candidates don't want to piss her off.

Kennedy, Kerry, Feingold, Wyden, Harkin, Obama, Mikulski... many senators support the cluster bomb legislation. Money is not a reason to oppose cleaning up weapons around the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. can't have that. besides
israel's military did a complete and fair investigation of the Israeli military and found that their use of 4 million cluster bombs on civilian, heavily populated, and innocent lebanese towns and cities was not just justified, but a great defensive move.

so that answers that question.

I cannot believe how craven and ball-less the US has been on the cluster bomb issue. gawd, have we lost all sense of civility, morals, ethics and honor? Apparently, when Israel is involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Well, then you pay for it...
that was easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NI4NI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. This is why!
Edited on Fri Dec-28-07 09:48 AM by NI4NI
Senator Biden:

"Mr. President, I share the concerns that prompted the introduction of this amendment, but I am not prepared to approve a far reaching measure without a clear legislative record regarding the need for it and its likely impact on U.S. and allied forces.

Clusterbombs have always posed problems for responsible military forces like those of the United States.
The weapons are very useful militarily, but they also carry a real risk of causing civilian casualties if they are used where civilians are present or if too many submunitions fail to explode when they hit the ground. This is a legitimate issue to consider and, perhaps legislate.
But it should be done in a careful manner, after holding hearings and with proper preparation.

I urge the Senate Armed Services Committee to hold hearings on the issue of cluster munitions so that we can all gain a better understanding of how to maintain their usefullness while maintaining their risks.

The committe should also make sure the Defense Department lives up to its claim that it "is working towards minimizing "dud" cluster munitions by phasing cluster munitions systems with more reliable or self-destructing fuzes" Success in that effort would go far to reduce the risks of postwar casulties.

I yield back the balance of my time"

Joe Biden September 06, 2006

That's WHY! And your FALSE assertion that Biden or Clinton and Dodd voted against the prohibiting of civilians getting clusterbombed is garbage! Next question!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Thanks!!!!!!!
I have been unable to get to Joe's Senate site to see his floor statement on this. As always, he had a rational reason for not agreeing to the terms of the amendment!!!!!!!



!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. That drivel is a substantive reason? Please.
It is utterly meaningless politico-speak.

And the purpose is clearly stated: "To protect civilian lives from unexploded cluster munitions."

Look at the company Biden and the others are in - all those Rs, and the likes of Lieberman. Look at the "yeas" - Kerry, Boxer, Kennedy, etc.

But this vote is to be excused because...because....because....?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NI4NI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. the amendment is about not funding purchases, sales, and
Edited on Fri Dec-28-07 01:37 PM by NI4NI
transfers of weapons without a guarantee from the DoD that the weapons will not be used in or near any civilian concentration. AND THEY SHOULDN'T BE!
It's bad enough that they gotta be used at all, and I'm sick to death and fxxxxx repulsed by the term "Collateral Damage" even if Pat Leahy says it.

But, any amendment, from either minority or majority member, concerning a complex military restriction getting passed before being fully scrutinized in the very least by the Senate Armed Services Committee, besides other committees as well, and without full debate on the floor,is inept and damn well foolish.

And also, regarding some of Biden's other "drivel" which included making sure that the DoD kept their word concerning the utilization of self-destructing fuzzes. Oddly enough, in light of the this amendments stated PURPOSE: "To Protect Civilian Lives From Unexploded Clustermunitions" Senator Feinstein admitted that even though there are steps to take to ensure a failure rate of less than 1%, her amendment did not address the issue.

Joe Biden needs no excuse for thought out reasoning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. That is pretty weak - he needs hearings?
Cluster bombs have been used by the US since Vietnam.

They are not specifically against international law, but there are many who feel that they fail this test:

"The Geneva Conventions hold that when choosing which targets to hit and which weapons to use, armies must make sure they do not "cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering" and ensure that the harm to civilians does not outweigh the military advantages."
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2003-12-10-cluster-bomb-cover_x.htm

Note that Kerry and Harkin who actually served voted for it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tejanocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. "Let's have bi-partisan committee hearings instead" is Biden's response to most issues. Comes from
too much time in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NI4NI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Maybe
that's why he's gotten so much done in his carrer.....just a wild guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. I've been noticing a lot of "I'll call for hearings" from Clinton, too
It seems "let's hold hearings" is the currently popular means of dodging an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NI4NI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. I did make note
of Senators Kerry and Harkin's service, and that they voted for it.
Just as I did Senators Lautenberg's service and Senator Inouye, a Medal of Honor winner, who did not......go fiqure!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
21. Dodd's vote is the most curious
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
22. Completely debunked, thanks to poster #1. What a feeble implication, btw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC