Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Day 1903: Still No Apology From Hillary for Voting for The Iraq War Resolution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:16 AM
Original message
Day 1903: Still No Apology From Hillary for Voting for The Iraq War Resolution
Since we're into counting the number of days, is there any more important candidate (mis)judgment that should be apologized for than rubber-stamping Chimpy's war plan? Yet Hillary has still not said she's sorry. She should be held accountable.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=2&vote=00237
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm holding her accountable for that and for her other misjudgements.
I will never vote for her again.

She has demonstrated that her judgement makes her unfit for not only the Presidency, but for the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Cool - let's help a republican win instead
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. So helping a different Democrat to win is totally out of the question?
It must be, as Clinton's nomination has already been announced by the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Point take but....
when the poster says "I will never vote for Clinton" that pretty much includes every election out there including general election.

Personally, I'd like to think of it - I will not support Clinton in the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. This poster hasn't said "I will never vote for Clinton"...
Perhaps you're referring to someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I wasn't talking about you
Scroll down and follow the flow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Ah. My bad.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. "Clinton's nomination has already been announced by the media"
Missed that one, please provide a link, thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #20
33. Sorry I should have included this
Edited on Fri Dec-28-07 10:17 AM by TechBear_Seattle
I thought the :sarcasm: tag would have been self-evident. My bad. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
37. I smell Rove
Fearmongering is a puke attribute -- of course, it's *okay* when Clinton supporters use it. :eyes: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's so easy as an Obama supporter to blame her claiming your candidate is clean
Edited on Fri Dec-28-07 09:26 AM by LynneSin
It was a different world back then when the vote occurred. I remember standing 5 feet away from Joe Biden after a speaking engagement he had in Delaware sometime late September in 2002. He talked informally to a group of us after is speech where he even answered many of the questions we had about the upcoming vote.

He knew he had his doubts but he also knew that there was some concerns about what was happening in Iraq at this time. Biden was troubled about the whole vote and knew that no matter how he voted that there were potential outcomes that would affect him the rest of his life. Oh, and Biden has a kid in the Army Reserves who was just called to tour starting in 2008, so Biden has something at stake.
The vote was never about starting but about giving Bush the authority to go to the UN. Bush was the one that changed the that resolution.

My point? It's damn easy for an Obama supporter to post shrill comments like you just did. It's easy for Obama to say "Hey I wouldn't have voted that way" only because Obama was NOT in the Senate when the vote happened. None of us will ever know how Obama would have voted that day and I say bullshit to anyone, including Barack Obama himself, if any of you say "Oh I wouldn't have supported the war"

Once again - another bullshit slam post on another candidate - perhaps because their own isn't as strong?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. How is being sorry being held accountable?
I don't care who is sorry. I assume they all goddamned sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. She should be held accountable for her fucked-up war mongering...
and her failure to admit that it was a mistake. At least Edwards had the courage to stand up and admit
he was wrong. I can respect that...his co-sponsorship of the IWR notwithstanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. Being sorry is not being held *accountable*
It is being let off the hook. Edwards got sorry when he wanted to run again. It's a political apology and even if he means it, so what? I couldn't disagree more with you on this, jeff_dem. Accountability is no primary vote for them, whether they are sorry or not for fucked-up war mongering - no bright shining Democratic nomination. They shouldn't be rewarded based on being sorry for the biggest foreign policy disaster in decades. If a car mechanic totals your car and says he's sorry, do you take your new car back there for service, do you recommend the garage to your unsuspecting friends? If a surgeon is supposed to take out your son's appendix and takes out his heart by mistake, as long as he says he's sorry about it, do you send your daughter into that office with stomach pain? There is no room for excuses and double standards and cosmetic apologies when you're talking about years past of wasted blood and treasure and years future of national bankruptcy. They can be forgiven on a human level, but professionally rewarded for sorry on the job performance and failure to protect the nation and the Constitution? No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. Point well-taken, WesDem.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Okay, sweetie
Button pushed, buzzer sounded :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #21
39. Exactly, WesDem.
What's done is done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. I agree.
That's the elephant in the room she's determined to ignore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. Like most Democrats, I don't care if she uses the word "sorry"
She's said, for years now, that if they knew then what they know now there wouldn't even have been a vote, and of course she wouldn't have voted for it. DU's HillHaters only pretend they're for another candidate - the truth is they are only here to oppose one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. I love how it's the Obama supporters.....
....like we could truly speculate how Obama would have voted if he were in the senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. If he held true to form, he would've voted with Clinton, as he has on all Iraq votes since elected.
But then, he might've skipped town ala Kyl/Lieberman, or voted Present as he did on many tough issues back in the state assembly in Illinois.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Is that her latest position? ...After she said she had "No regrets"?
Bah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. A quick google shows that's been her position since 2004. Try to keep up, jeff
You're letting your hatred fog your reasoning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. April 21, 2004: "Hillary Clinton: No regret on Iraq vote"
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #18
29. CNN 8/29/04 "if we had known then what we know now, there wouldn't have been a vote."
BLITZER (8/29/04): When you voted for that resolution, like almost everyone else, you believed Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction?

CLINTON: Right, right. Well, indeed I did. And if someone asked me that if we had known then what we know now, there wouldn't have been a vote. You know, no administration would have come to the Congress and asked for a vote that would have authorized any kind of action based on what we now know.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
46. what we know now was already in the NIE..
did she bother to read it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
12. Stale argument. She didn't agree to
war. She agreed on a resolution to go to war only if diplomacy didn't work. It is not her fault that the Chimp speaks with forked tongue. He is the problem, not Hillary. If she is our nominee I will vote for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
19. This is an old winger trick--change the subject when the heat is on.
Edited on Fri Dec-28-07 09:48 AM by Perry Logan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Why so dismissive of her war vote?
Did you agree with her then also?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #23
32. I think we're more dismissive of you, actually
Edited on Fri Dec-28-07 10:15 AM by Tarc
and this dumb, tired Hillary-hating rhetoric. I'm not going to hold her feet to the fire for not literally saying "I am sorry for my vote". As far as I am concerned, this

BLITZER (8/29/04): When you voted for that resolution, like almost everyone else, you believed Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction?

CLINTON: Right, right. Well, indeed I did. And if someone asked me that if we had known then what we know now, there wouldn't have been a vote. You know, no administration would have come to the Congress and asked for a vote that would have authorized any kind of action based on what we now know.


more than answers the question.

Her only fault here, along with the other Democrats who voted yes, was that they were too believing of the Bush administration at the time. The thought that there was such a revolting bed of deception behind what the administration presented to Congress was unforeseeable at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
22. Hillary does not believe her IWR vote was a mistake
given 1) The state of intelligence - including from the Clinton years, that Iraq had WMDs
2) The high priority of the Clinton Administration to get the UN inspectors back into Iraq
3) The stated policy of regime change throughout Bush1-Clinton-BushW

The Clinton administration had top level meetings on getting Saddam out, going so far as having Al Gore run though an invasion scenario with the Joint Chiefs involving 360,000.

On the evidence available to her, Hillary simply doesn't believe her vote was a mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rAVES Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
25. No doubt in my mind the Clinton and her DLC handlers are 100% behind the chimps war...
Edited on Fri Dec-28-07 09:57 AM by rAVES
albeit a tad more clandestine than say the Ghoul..

She about as progressive as they come!!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. She is quite progressive -- look at her Senate voting record
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rAVES Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. yea, and the Ghoul is a social liberal too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #28
36. No, he isn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
30. Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
This just in: BO votes the same as Hillary on Iraq issues.
(But don't let facts get in your way!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
31. Tripe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
34. forget it. HRC is not going to grovel for you and unlike edwards
who kissed enough ass after he apoligized was sickening. Obama who loves nothing more then bringing his 2002 speech saying he was against the war, but kinda funny yesterday axelrod from the obama camp was trying to link the iraq vote by hrc to the death of bhutto...does not this silly sombitch realize obama has voted for money for this war and thus he is also blaming obama as well if you can have that six degrees of separation. How stupid for axelrod to say something as stupid..

but hrc owes no one an apology for her vote. Damn! Get over yourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. "hrc owes no one an apology for her vote."






These assholes need to get over themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TerwilligeRedux Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
35. is this tit for tat really necessary?
the more things change, the more they stay the same
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. Hey dude!
Welcome to DU!! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
38. This is a matter of political posturing.
After the fact, politicians adopt stances for political purposes. That's cuz they are politicians. It's what they do. Some think it's better for them to say "sorry," others that they "regret," others that they were "misled," whatever positions them best.

In terms of belief, emotions, and future policy decisions, it DOESN'T MATTER. I know that's hard to read but it's the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
42. She won't apologize. The only mistake to her is HOW the war has been executed.
She won't apologize for something she was eager to see happen so she could gain some security cred before running. She thought this would be a clean sweep and she'd have the issue to run on. Now she knows it was a mistake, but to admit that now would be political suicide, and doing what's right comes in second to doing what furthers her path to the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
43. Honestly, so what?
She should be held accountable for it, as should the others, whether they've "apologized" or not. I'd just as soon not hear manipulative pseudo apologies predicated on the idea that there is a reward to be gained from it at the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
44. OP directly lifted from RW Hate site
STOPHillary.comSource: CNN.com, "Hillary Clinton: No regret on Iraq vote". HILLARY ON IRAQ AND TERRORISM. "In the four years since the inspectors left, ...
www.stophillary.com/lies.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Actually, not even close.
But thanks for the link... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC