Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama: U.S. needs to come down hard on Musharraf

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Hope And Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 04:07 PM
Original message
Obama: U.S. needs to come down hard on Musharraf
Obama: U.S. needs to come down hard on Musharraf


December 28, 2007

BY ABDON M. PALLASCH Political Reporter

WILLIAMSBURG, Iowa -- A day after former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto was assassinated, White House hopeful Barack Obama said the United States needs to come down hard on Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf.

Obama said today he would suspend any military aid to Pakistan not directly going to fight al Qaida until Musharraf gets “serious” about stomping out the group.

“We have poured billions of dollars in support to President Musharraf,” Obama told hundreds of supporters who braved a snowstorm to hear him at the Mary Welsh Elementary School. “This despite the fact that he has suspended democratic practices in Pakistan. He has not obeyed the constitution. He has put the chief justice there under house arrest, still has political prisoners and the press is suppressed. As we’re supposed to be leading up to elections.”

Obama and most of the other Democratic and Republican presidential candidates are scrambling around Iowa amid heavy snowfall today with just days to go before next week’s caucuses.

“As long as we are supporting somebody who the Pakistani people themselves believe has subverted democracy, that strengthens the hand of the Islamic militants,” Obama told the crowd.

more...

http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/obama/717203,obama122807.article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oops, not sure I agree with Obama here--I'm not sure there's a way
to dictate how the aid is spent, in terms of just fighting AQ. I agree that we shouldn't endlessly appease Musharraf, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. actually there is an rather easy way i think
make the aid dependent on certain things being achieved or done, if he does nothing to really combat the militants etc etc then portions of the aid will not be given, the less he does the less he gets, the more of the requirements he fulfills the more of the aid he gets
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. He said hard on.
Hee! Heee!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. LOL
I completely missed that when I read it the first time. Thank goodness you pointed it out. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. This was a no-brainer when he proposed it a month ago
and it still is.
Biden has also got it right on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. This should have been done long ago
Enough of these propped up dictators. We need to get serious about all of the influences in the region, from Israel to Saudi Arabia to Iran. No more of these phony "allies" who lie to their people and serve no purpose except to control oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. oh yeah let's have ANOTHER war Obama supports, and why not Iran for the bargain?
sounds like he's come down with Hillaryitis. suppose he will be in FRONT of the troops during the charge?

Msongs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. Im not sure coming down hard on lunatic dictators with nukes is a good idea
diplomacy has its merits - maybe we forgot that after 8 years of the GOP "coming down hard" on dictators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC