Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Whoever get the democratic nomination this time

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 12:19 PM
Original message
Whoever get the democratic nomination this time
will be the next president. It's not nearly the race that the MSM is trying to make it out to be. I know we'll continue squabbling about electability, but the fact is that the republican party is in shambles and it's not going to improve. Some candidates might have more durable coattails than others, but that's about it.

On January 20th, 2009 we'll watch a democratic president sworn into office, and we'll see a democratic Congress with increased majorities in both House and Senate, convening.

Then they better get to work repairing the past 8 years.


*this is not merely wishful thinking; it's about demographics, party identification, and a zeitgueist that has shifted radically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lordy, I hope you're right.
But we'd have to count on two things:
1) A less agressive GOP than last time.
2) A more savvy electorate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. We have a FED UP electorate!
That's even better than savvy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. A "fed up" electorate stays home. And that helps the GOP.
imo, ymmv.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. What does ymmv mean?
My brother sent me an email recently and at the end of it he put: HNY. It took me forever to figure it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. "your mileage may vary"
Edited on Sun Dec-30-07 01:41 PM by MethuenProgressive
I first came across it on hiking sites like www.whiteblaze.net and www.viewsfromthetop.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. OK--What does "Your mileage may vary" refer to? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. I heartily agree!
I'm not worried about the Republicans this time around. People in general are entirely fed up with them. They've made a mess of everything and it hasn't escaped their notice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Reparing the past eight years is not enough...
They must be undone. All reminders of George W. Bush must be purged from our midst. Let his name endure in our history books, newspaper archives, and memoirs of Washington insiders. But no further.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it
We, as a nation, must remember Bush so that no other president will ever try to do the things he did. I would like to see him in an old pilgrim's stockade in the Washington Mall for the rest of history for all to see and throw rotten fruit at him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I'm not saying that we should FORGET Bush...
I am not in favor of chiseling his name out of our monuments as the Egyptians did to Akhnaten. But I want Bush's influence purged from Capitol Hill, the stench of neo-conservatism and neo-fascism eradicated from the halls and corridors of the House and Senate once and for all. Let us return to the old familiar battles of Republican vs. Democrat without the spectre of Prescott Bush hanging over them both and threatening to destroy all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. I agree
and also think that many in the GOP WANT the Dems to win this time--we'll be inheriting a mess, and when it isn't cleaned up immediately, the GOP will blame all the troubles they started on us.

Sometimes I wonder why anyone wants the Democratic nomination knowing this will happen. I just hope that Congress decides that they can work with our new President. I'll be flabbergasted if the Democratic majority in both houses keeps on following the Republican line on things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't think it will be that easy
The country is pretty evenly divided. There are a lot of people who will vote Republican no matter who their candidate is. Plus, the Republicans are a lot better at dirty politics than we are. They look at politics as life or death war - do whatever it takes to win.

That said, I do believe that we will win in 08, I just don't think that the Democratic candidate will be a shoe-in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. But it's not pretty evenly divided at this time.
The republican party has been bleeding registered voters, and it's fracturing in a truly fascinating way. The tension that has long existed between the financial conservatives and the the wingnuts is boiling over. This is not 2004 and it's not even 2006. Pendulums ALWAYS swing in the political world, and all the leading indicators are there to inform us that it's swung back to the dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. The Pendulum Can ALWAYS Swing Further to the Right


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. I am not so certain.
Look how close this last election was--the Senate did not win by a huge margin.

Diebold / right-wing media / and depending on the Democratic candidate we choose, this is not a slam-dunk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Problem is, we said that in 2004.
I remember DU collectively believing that NOBODY, short of his ignorant base, would vote for Bush. He'd already played the idiot role for 4 years, and there was no way he'd get re-elected. Plus, we were running a war hero. A successful congressperson.

Granted, the election was stolen, and the voters' voice was quashed, but he still took it. I don't for a minute think that it can't happen again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I didn't and neither did anyone I know. I'll never forget going to
vote with two friends and my son who was voting for the first time We all had a terrible sense of forboding and felt sure bushco would be staying on in the WH. On the other hand, I was certain about 2006. I'm more certain about next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yup. The destiny of this election is out of Repukes hands. It's ours to win or lose & we won't lose.
This is why our people are fighting tooth & nail to win the nod. They know that as long as there are no major screw-ups during the general campaign, the winner of the Democratic Primary will be the next person to sit in the WH.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
17. We Said That in 2004, and We KNEW We Were Going to Win in 2000 Too
We did, both times, but it was close enough to steal, and they did.





What makes you so sure it won't happen again?

The Swift Boat Liars are back, and busy making up new lies for the Mighty Slime Machine to repeat.

There will be 3rd-party candidates, perhaps as many as 3 of them, peeling off Democratic votes.

We no longer have candidates of the calibre of Al Gore, John Kerry, or Howard Dean. Today we have Hillary, Obama, and Edwards, Biden, Richardson, Dodd, and Kucinich.

Electability is an issue, a great, big issue. We have to win by a landslide or they'll steal it again.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Speak for yourself. I didn't think we'd win in either year. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
18. It will depend more on how bad the economic crash is and if there are gas stations open under 5.99
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
22. I've said the same thing, but McCain might be the single exception.
Which is why I am rooting for any of the other GOP candidates, other than McCain, to do well in Iowa and New Hampshire. McCain doesn't have the money that Rudy or Romney have, but if he wins NH and then SC, he could raise a lot of cash quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC