Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Silent Majority on DU

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 09:20 AM
Original message
The Silent Majority on DU
as far as I can tell


SUPPORT EDWARDS!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. If they're silent, how can you tell? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. because he does great most DU polls and has the least shills clogging up this board! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Ok, I understand
That makes sense. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. inconspicuous nudges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe we should call it the Morel Majority....
...since it's mushrooming.

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Good one...
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. so what?
DU is not the real world. 2 months ago DU overwhelmingly supported Dennis. I suppose this is progress toward recognizing the real world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. We're silent, that's the difference, a lot less shilling. Means much more. IMHO. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Not so. The Edwards contingent is just as vocal as any other group here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. you live in a dream world if you think the edwards supporters are more or as shrill on DU than
hillary and obama supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Looks more like a nightmare to me... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. I didn't say as shrill- they're not, but neither are they silent. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BridgeTheGap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Not everyone pays as much attention as us
A crying shame, if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatdoyouthink Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
12. I Wouldn't Say Silent
But he does appear? to have the Majority!!! (here and most other progressive Forms/blogs/etc - that i have come across - except extreme Left ones, and Right'ee ones)

Now if these (Sic ?) polls - would just reflect it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
13. I agree... he's the consensus candidate
Besides, we all want to choose a sure winner, and let's face it, he's got he best numbers against all Republican opponents and he will benefit from being the most viable un-Clinton anti-oligarchy candidate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
26. I silently... agree (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
15. yeah that silent majority
like Nixons' are misguided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. So Edwards supporters are misguided?
Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. sad but true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Not sad, just your opinion.
Some feel that Biden supporters are misguided because it doesn't look like he has any chance in this race.

There are candidates that I don't support but I would never call them misguided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Fair enough
Edited on Mon Dec-31-07 10:10 AM by Froward69
however, Supporting substance and experience, far outweighs flash and rhetoric.

the sad but true part is how allot of people will get on the bandwagon without seriously considering all candidates.

More of my opinion now, it would seem to me that the support for edwards and hillary is more about what we could or should have had instead of Bush. where as what we need NOW, is Joe Biden
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. I guess this is an example of what the OP was talking about
I do agree and have posted frequently regarding my support for Biden. I do agree that Biden has the biggest resume. Technically the only qualification needed, according to the constituion, is being a natural born citizen and at least 35yrs. of age.

It's hard to say that people haven't seriously considered all the candidates. For whatever reason Dodd and Biden are not catching on.

In spite of all this I do understand the OP's point with this thread. Edwards supporters do seem to be less confrontational and less likely to shill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingofNewOrleans Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Biden has been catching on
Unfortunately, it looks like if you'll pardon the cliche "too little, too late". He's got a strong organization in Iowa and I think could surprise. He could reach 15%. The problem is I don't think he's been as visible in NH and the calendar just moves too fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. I do hope that he makes a strong showing in Iowa n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. I am just
nauseated by the ignorance, and ability to believe in nothing. post after post "Edwards has the prettiest blue eyes" or "edwards would go to Iraq if he could." Hell a 16 year old went to Iraq from Florida... so why is edwards not going again??? then the "edwards says this..." whilst his website says the opposite. :eyes: :mad: :eyes: :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. BIden would make sense to me except I absolutely detest anyone who has allowed the banks
And credit card people to do to us what has been done since the latest bank "reforms" of 2005 occurred.

Biden was a proud sponsor of that "reform".

The banking industry has an entire set of laws, which would probably take entire forests if they were to be printed out and handed over to one tenth of those who have a bank account.

I have a legal grudge with Wells Fargo. But I don't know if it will stand up in court or not, because although I know that Wells Fargo is a federally chartered bank, it can operate according to state charter in areas it chooses to.

Or not, if it doesn't choose.

Now it is not only aggravating that I as a consumer cannot understand the rules of law that pertain to a bank I once trusted, but I have called consumer experts on banking and they are clueless also.

Becuase the banking changes brought about by the "reform" bill of 2005 are so convoluted that even the experts are stymied.

Thanks Joe! Way to go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #15
29. Nice to see the "Biden people" out attacking Edwards people for NO reason once again.
Don't make me embarassed to use my avatar, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Thanks!
Bringing down another candidate does not elevate yours. I know things are getting tense, but now is the time to show some restraint and civility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanine Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
17. I may be quiet on here
but I read everything I can and pass it along . . daily . . to many.
I am an Edward's supporter at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
18. The Vocal Minority on DU.
About five "Edwards Haters."

They follow Edwards' threads around repeating the same predictable lines over and over.

One has a Journal that is 90% dedicated to bashing Edwards.



Sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadesOfGrey Donating Member (646 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. I've noticed that too...

It is very sad.

I'm proud that most Edwards supporters aren't spamming the boards playing "bash a dem".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
28. silent or not
I think it is very late in the day for all liberal groups and boards to get their act together in any type of leading way, which is a diminished opportunity to advance what we know and believe. In any case we would NOT effect much of the results in the primaries which is good in that we must follow the lead of the electorate, the gangland SILENCED majority who have been betrayed over and over again.

Any shrillness is much less of an issue than coming together on the agenda and the leader we desperately need. And Cali is correct in pointing out that many boards backed up DK or Dean. Our search for relevance must focus on the agenda and the best means to meet it. That means the ticket top to bottom, getting out and protecting the vote, media challenges, money and volunteering, representing the progressive concerns with or over and above the candidate who hopefully will carry that banner. Getting clout that we cannot seem to get by the first step of unifying on a candidate or firming up our united grassroots resolve pure and simple.

And whether or not I am actually wearing those M&M pj's and Homer Simpson slippers that I received on Christmas should not discourage anyone from supporting Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VarnettaTuckpocket Donating Member (559 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
33. He always wins BIG in the polls here, the OP is right, there's a lot of us n/t
Edited on Mon Dec-31-07 04:12 PM by VarnettaTuckpocket
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. As Edwards and Obama fall, as they seem to be doing...
Biden will move up to fill the empty space. There are some early indicators of this happening.

As to those on the board who remain silent, perhaps they are enjoying the catfight and fireworks.

Yes, there was a time when the Kucinich folks dominated the board. They tend to do that en masse on every site they can find. Attack quickly and attempt to boost their candidate and then they leave to damage another site/poll. Case in point, the Virginia straw poll where Dennis got 33% of the online votes. 33%? Some of them are just facing reality.

Anyway, going out on a limb, I'll say that Biden will either move into 2nd or 3rd spot after NH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogmarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
35. What I've noticed is that
JE supporters are vocal in their support of him, but for the most part abstain from dissing other candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-31-07 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
36. There are silent people here?!?!?! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC