Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is your opinion of compulsory voting?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:18 PM
Original message
Poll question: What is your opinion of compulsory voting?
What is your opinion of compulsory voting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Completely unenforceable
In order to make that a reality, you would have to have a national holiday. And even then, I don't know how you would enforce it.

The only way to get more people to the polls, is to give them a candidate worth voting for. I don't understand why that simple reality is too much for the "consultants" to understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Umm they do it in Australia, and seem to enforce it pretty well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #17
33. Australia is small numerically, and NOT very diverse. Also even LESS privacy freedom than here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. You don't deserve to be an American if you don't vote in the national elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. Thanks for the definition of a true American. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
34. on that I absolutely agree! Too not vote is just plain assed treason.
we are partially in the predicament we are in for precisely the reason that it takes less than 25% of the electorate to win a general election(fewer)if you own the USSupCT and the electronic voting machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. However election day should be a national holiday.
And while we are reforming elections, toss out the stupid electoral college and elect the president through direct vote, requiring a majority of votes to win in an instant run-off system. Standardize all voting equipment to use verified paper ballots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. I'm not certain about the national holiday bit.
But, if it were to happen, employees should be required to provide proof to their employers (a receipt issued at the polling place for example), that they actually voted and didn't just take advantage of the day to go and fuck-off doing something else.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Well no. The idea is to make it easy to vote.
Not to make it an onerous task that you have to validate with your employer. An election day holiday would be a nice secular national event, and instead of having rush to the polls either before or after work, it could be a relaxed enjoyable day of civic pride and reflection. I believe lots of nations do this, and it seems to work just fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. Heaven forbid we fuck off on election day
instead of memorial day. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. No.
We need less government interference in our lives... not more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Enforced or mandated voting--absolutely not! ...
What is needed is more directed education about citizenship and what is entailed.

An informed electorate has power. Mindless voters with no understanding of their actions, as would be the case with mandated voting, defeat the idea of representitive democracy.

New citizens being made every day, know more about our system of governance than most of our young just graduating from college.

As a matter of fact, students at the high school level around the world know more than our students do about our Democratic Republic.

Education...that is the only answer. For Moms and Dads...you have failed in your most important job if you fail to enlighten your kids to what we have and what we may yet lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Not without mandatory voter education. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. mandatory voter education, mandatory voting....That's my position.
If you don't vote and don't have a good reason (sick or whatever)...You're Fined 100 bucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Again though, how do you enforce that?
Without resorting to fascism, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retired AF Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. If they don't vote for the candidate you want do you
fine them 100 bucks.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. No...200 and 500 if they vote for a republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WheelWalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. Same as I think of Drunk Voting....
It gives power to chimps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
35. Hmmm... "If you vote, don't drink. If you drink, don't vote."
Edited on Wed Jan-02-08 02:12 AM by Seabiscuit
and... "friends don't let friends vote drunk".

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. How about if you drink shitty quality beer, don't vote?
It may be a stereotype to some extent, but I'd be willing to bet that Freepers drink far more flavorless piss water "beer" than Liberals do. :beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. Anyone who drinks Coors or Miller Lite should be permanently banned from the voting booth.
Maybe we should only allow people to vote who drink beer made in Belgium or Holland?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. It wouldn't do anything anyway.
People would just write in Peewee Herman if they didn't want to vote...And if sucha movement got big enough, we could have a real mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. Death penalty? Hard labor? Incarceration?
God knows we don't need any more ignorant voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. Works in Australia - and they've also got IRV

Some of the first countries that introduced mandatory voting laws were Belgium in 1892, Argentina in 1914 and Australia in 1924.

It's time we required people to be informed and to make electoral choices or pay a tax assessment if they choose not to vote.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. But don't you think that if you give the government the power to force you to vote,
it is one easy step to having it tell for whom you should vote?

Just my libertarian ruminations on giving the government even more power over citizens...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #21
31. No, I think it's incumbent upon people living in a representative democracy to vote

It doesn't matter how the government provides the incentive for voting or the disincentive for not. It's completely the individual's responsibility to be an informed voter.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #31
38. While I agree with you on "good government" principles, the flaw in your
argument is that if the state mandates voting, with punishments if people don't vote, then it is not "completely" the individual's responsibility. IOW, if the individual is not compelled by his or her own responsibility as a citizen living in a representative democracy, then the "responsibility" you talk about is transferred to the state. The citizen in that case might or might not become "informed." They might just vote uninformed to avoid a fine imposed by the state. We're not any further along in getting informed citizens in that case.

A better way, IMHO, is to provide for more civics classes, starting early in public schooling and continuing through 12th grade. That way, kids know from the start that becoming an informed citizen is what you learn to do, just as learning to drive a car is a skill you acquire as you grow up. That way, the state is helping the process of molding a responsible citizenry, but in a much more productive way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. I think the government should provide a positive incentive for voting, which is what Australia does

A person shouldn't be "fined" for not voting, they should get a tax break for voting.

Civics has been under attack by Republicans on school boards for years as part of their strategy to drive down the vote.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. The tax thing is great but to be fair it should be like a "refundable tax credit" so that more poor
people get it. I guess if we give middle class homeowners a tax break with their mortgages out of a public policy to encourage home ownership and hence community stability, we could do a tax credit for voting.

I hadn't heard that the repubs were behind the idea to discourage civics courses! I had assumed that civics was abandoned in favor of a different kind of presenting American history, but I really was just guessing. Do you have some sources about this? I'd like to find out more!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. seems to work in australia
Edited on Tue Jan-01-08 06:02 PM by Lirwin2
If Jury duty is mandatory, then voting certainly should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. The last thing this country needs is more criminals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
19. Strongly support it. [n\t]
Edited on Tue Jan-01-08 06:08 PM by Nutmegger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynthia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
24. require it then, people will learn more about the candidates
it is no different than getting a driver's license. People who want to drive learn the rules of the road enough to pass the test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
25. Strongly against!
Do you really want to force all those ignoramuses to come out of the woodwork to vote for someone because the name looks familiar? Do you really want people voting just to get a slip of paper to show his boss that he voted to justify the day off? Not I.
I agree with the another poster here, give us honest candidates that really represent us, the common citizen and not some paid lobbyist. Then people will be more willing to educate themselves and vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Couldn't agree more!
Look at the idiots like Bush we get because those that vote don't spend much time thinking about their choices and keeping up on things.

Those who do not vote are even less involved with knowing what is going on.

It isn't as if these folks couldn't vote if they wanted to!

Forcing them to vote is actually going against their wills....

What are you going to do, imprison them for not voting?

Sometimes the best answer is freedom instead of coersion....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
27. Or else what?
maybe if there's a $5 fine involved that goes to campaign finance or something.

My fear is that we'd end up with Ryan Seacrest as our next president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
28. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ooga booga Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
29. In the Murphy's Law Canon, there's Grossman's Misquote
Grossman's Misquote of H.L. Mencken

Complex problems always have simple, easy to understand wrong answers.


Compulsory voting is a simple, easy to understand wrong answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-01-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
30. Yes. Violators should be executed and then sent to the Russian front.
Citizenship requires responsible participatiion in the exercise of the right of self-governance. That participation should be demanded equally from all citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
32. Remember the Constitution before putting foot in mouth. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpeale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
39. i LIKE the idea of forcing people to get involved in their democratic process
it would definitely cut down on the whining about elected officials. there should also be a fine involved in not participating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. No, a better idea is to go back to mandatory civics in grade, middle and high school.
Everybody has to take it in order to graduate from one level to the other and most importantly from high school, just like math, science and English. We can "force" people to be better informed citizens through our public school system. That's what education is all about, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
40. Remember the Constitution....?
Yeah, I remember it. It starts out with: "We, the People."

James Madison said: "The People, who are its authors, must support and defend their Constitution against its enemies, taking up arms, if necessary....."

We, the People, can defend that Constitution by securing it against all enemies, foreign and domestic, with arms if necessary. But more realistically with our votes - electing those of us to office who will understand the oath they take upon assuming those offices.

The vote of each individual is the most powerful force there is in securing governments of, by, and for those people who use their precious elections wisely and regularly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
43. People too lazy to vote are also too lazy to learn about the issues
and the candidates. Do we want any more of the stupid people voting? Hello, President Huckabee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NastyRiffraff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
45. As much as I want more Americans to vote
I disagree with the idea of forced voting. It would seriously skew the elections. If people are too lazy to educate themselves about candidates NOW, they won't change if they're forced to vote. Random voting, anyone? I think there should be more voter EDUCATION, and I agree with the thought of a national holiday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC