Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton 36% Obama 25% Edwards 23% Rasmussen today

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 12:29 PM
Original message
Clinton 36% Obama 25% Edwards 23% Rasmussen today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Edwards climbing at Clinton's expense
I think that's the only thing we can conclude from it because the numbers seem to be way off the numbers of other polls. Polling different type of people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It's national, not New Hampshire.
Is that what's making the difference you see?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. That's it.
I just assumed this was NH poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I haven't looked at any other national polling numbers today.
These numbers are national, not New Hampshire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. There hasnt been national polling in awhile for anything besides Rasmussen lately
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durtee librul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting.....only Edwards has gained
Obama has been about the same at 23-25%, HRC has dropped from 41%, JRE has gained. Sign of the times?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The votes Hillary lost did NOT go to Obama?
How interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Looks like some big changes
Edwards has only been in the mid-teens until Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Clinton is starting to drop a bit nationally. At least that appears to be the trend. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SCDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Rasmussen also says that Obama is up 12 according to the markets
Iowa was the first election test for our new service—RasmussenMarkets.com. The markets accurately projected Obama and Huckabee as the winners.

Rasmussen Markets data currently shows Obama with a 60.5 % chance of winning the Democratic nomination while Clinton has a 38.9 % chance.

Groundwork is where it's at - not polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wow, people are switching to Edwards
Edwards no doubt is picking up some with former Hill supporters along with former Biden and Dodd supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Looking good for Edwards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. You beat me by 4 minutes. I looked before hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I knew you'd be along
I saw your post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
15. Why do all polls show Clinton ahead, including the ones done in Iowa?
Are polls so completely useless?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. The IA Polls Show Her Trailing Slightly
The nat'l polls still show her leading...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. That's odd. Should polls be watched at all? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC