|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
quinnox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:10 PM Original message |
Edwards had very bad result |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
1. How can he be done. I give him till Super Tuesday. No need to push him out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2rth2pwr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Edwards has been pushing for the race to be winnowed down. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:14 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. I'm thinking of the people. I he's thinking of more time in debates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2rth2pwr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 11:19 PM Response to Reply #16 |
31. I like his idea of only including the relevant candidates in the next debates. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClericJohnPreston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
2. And this from someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lvx35 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
3. He needs to attack Barackary Cliboma |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nankerphelge (995 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
4. He's gonna keep.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
griffi94 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
6. edwards is my first choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
7. Oh, please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
8. Not necessarily |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 11:32 PM Response to Reply #8 |
36. Not the noise in NH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
9. NH is not the most liberal of Dem states. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:14 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. I noticed that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:26 PM Response to Reply #15 |
24. NH used to go lean Republican until more recent cycles. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midwestern Democrat (238 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 10:14 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. I've always thought NH was a lousy state to have this much influence in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 10:20 PM Response to Reply #9 |
29. NH has a conservative history. Things do not change over night there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 11:24 PM Response to Reply #9 |
32. Very conservative state and his Southernness was not a plus. /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Double T (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
10. Edwards would make a GREAT VP!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 10:21 PM Response to Reply #10 |
30. Edwards would make a better president. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Double T (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 11:28 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Got to get REAL. Edwards just isn't getting the numbers he needs to win the Presidency. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
11. Not ready to write John off yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojambo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
12. Not a great result, but he was never terribly strong up there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
13. Damn, quinnox, I expect much more sophisticated analysis from you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quinnox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:15 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. he doesnt have to drop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
14. Edwards had a very good result. His numbers increased by 9 percentage points in 10 days.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shoopnyc (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
18. Edwards mistake was throwing in with Obama... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojambo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:17 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Why was it "tasteless?" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquaman11173 (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:18 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Narrowing the field is a great way to be heard! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodgd_yall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 11:31 PM Response to Reply #18 |
35. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
weeve (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
19. NH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquaman11173 (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
21. What ever! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:22 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Edwards didn't buy into winning Iowa and NH? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquaman11173 (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 10:00 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Iowa yes ..NOT N.H. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
25. they didnt even mention he came in 2nd last primary n cnn, just bama1st-hill3rd like hes disappeared |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youthere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
28. I'd hate to think that two states could seal the deal for any leading candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-08-08 11:29 PM Response to Original message |
34. Two states out of .....how many? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC