Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My quesion. How did Hillary win? Period. nt

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:48 AM
Original message
My quesion. How did Hillary win? Period. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. she took control of her message the last few days
and basically gave orders to her incompetent advisors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
28. yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Mirrors.
David Copperfield charged her a fortune, too! Either that or she just got more votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. She Got More Votes, Ma'am
That is the ticket for winning an election....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. No you didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. Pardon me, Sir, but I do recall your post where you think she got them
because she cried. All's fair, apparently.

But enjoy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #13
24. Winning Ugly, Ma'am, Is Still A Win
It is certainly possible the display of emotion, in a form qualifying as grace under pressure to most witnesses, moved some people.

"An election differs from a civil war only as the bloodless surrender of a force outnumbered in the field differs from Waterloo."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. Ha! Alright then! And thank you for the guffaw! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. People actually voted? The nice thing about going into a booth is that they
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 02:20 AM by goldcanyonaz
aren't bullied into switching sides. They can actually vote their heart and let the chips fall where they may.

I don't recall anyone asking how Obama won?


edited for spelling error.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Exactly.
No intimidation, no cajoling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
29. Ouch!!!
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 02:19 AM by Mind_your_head
one? = won?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. She got more votes. It wasn't supernatural
it wasn't a conspiracy, it wasn't theatrics.

She won out on issues like the economy and she got a lot of support from women voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. This is how she won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azathoth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. People who said they were going to vote for Obama didn't
Either they didn't show up, or they had a last-minute "epiphany" and switched to Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Maybe they didn't show up cause they didn't think they needed to.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azathoth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. That's a possiblity
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 02:00 AM by Azathoth
The execessive media hype around Obama made it seem like he had it in the bag. People aren't driven to the polls to vote when they think the election has already been decided. Particularly younger people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Well, let this be a lesson to them then......
about relying on polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
55. Umm, you know, THAT is quite easily possible..
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 05:26 PM by youthere
considering Obama pulls the most unreliable vote, the youth. It's quite possible they thought with his huge victory in Iowa that they weren't needed in NH.

I can see a groups of college kids geting together Tuesday night going "No I didn't go...OMG YOU didn't go vote either?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peoli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
11. Voter machine tampering
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. It seems to me...
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 01:56 AM by 1corona4u
if someone was going to 'tamper' with the voting machines, they'd make it a wider margin than it was. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tactical Progressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
15. Nobody really knows
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 02:03 AM by Tactical Progressive
but some people are saying that it could be the untrustworthines of pre-polling, where people say they will vote for minorities but then don't. Chuck Todd and Katrina VanDenHeuvel pointed to this possibility on MSNBC. Which would be pretty sad. I tend to not think so, but then maybe that's just unfounded optimism.

Eugene Robinson on MSNBC said it could have been older women upset at the treatment of Hillary Clinton by the media and the other candidates, showing up at the polls in larger numbers than expected.

They are all speculating. Their vast amounts of polling numbers and exit polls aren't telling them.

My opinion: Hillary is a much better candidate. Obama is a lot of high-sounding words and little experience in either federal government or executive positions. Huge 45-Hillary to 34-Obama spread among Democrats only, without independents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. I'm an older woman who likes Obama, Robinson, and doesnt' like
Hill.

You're right, and it doesn't matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
17. Several possibilities...
Independents. McCain did very well and probably pulled more independents than expected. Obama's support included a significant chunk of independents and his numbers relied on them more than Hillary's. Hillary's support among Dems was much higher than Obama's.

Undecideds. One report indicated that the undecideds were as high as 17% in the polls. If the majority of them went to Hillary, that would significantly change the outcome.

Last-minute decision-making. Reports were that something like 40% of voters made up their minds in the final three days. The polls would be unable to fully account for that, especially people who decided just today.

Or, some combination of the above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
19. The post Iowa bump was soft support for Obama
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 02:13 AM by killbotfactory
I think the Diner moment convinced a lot of people that she was sincere, and the support eroded.

I also don't think NH voters like being told who they are going to vote for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Your last sentence is soo true,
and I had been saying that, even in seeing the climbing polls in favor of Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. she always had an advantage in NH that Obama didn't have
the only reason this is so huge is because the media whores were going on about how she will lose big.

but Obama coming in just 2 points behind is not bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. 2 points isn't bad at all
Especially considering NH was solidly Clinton country just a few days ago.

The polls got everyones expectations out of whack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
21. Do you remember, Hillary herself said just after she lost in Iowa..
That she'll be happy to get to NH, where people can "make up their own minds". She was clearly counting on people either making up their own minds <cough> or Diebold making it up for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. And would it be Diebold's dictate had Obama won? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #21
30. Hey, the kids didn't show up....
oh well. That's what hurt Obama tonight. Nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sancho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #30
45. The kids NEVER show up...
if they do in this election, it will be the first time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOVA_Dem Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
25. Older white women felt sorry for HRC and lied to pollsters. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
27. I guess you got your answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
32. Because expectations create laziness.
This doesn't detract from the victory at all; however, I suspect the "inevitibility" meme worked against Obama in New Hampshire the same way it worked against Clinton in Iowa.

When supporters think their vote isn't needed, they are more apt to stay home.

On the flipside, when Supporters feel their vote is NEEDED, they tend to turn out.

Attacks on Clinton and the press declaring Obama the winner way ahead of time created a situation where Clinton voters turned out in large numbers, while Obama supporters didn't necessarily feel the need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. Your opinion is noted, but I disagree. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #35
40. What do you think it is? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #32
56. "attacks on clinton" is easy to say..
but what attacks? Are they attacks if it's true?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
33. Lack of big indy turnout for Obama.This might explain part of it:
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 02:23 AM by wlucinda
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4006130&mesg_id=4007292


Hillary and Obama were extremely close in the polls among Registered Dems. It didnt get covered because everyone though the indys would turn out. The link above has links to a couple of the polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. The big Indy turnout, turned out for Hillary. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. They spilt it didn't they? I think the ladies turned out for Hillary. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. If thats true then they turned out in record numbers over men.
I have no idea of the breakdown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. I havent seen it in a little while. I've been digging through the polls. I'm a bit
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 02:30 AM by wlucinda
cranky about MSNBC trying to blame their mis-calls on NH voters and trying to spin it into a racist issue. NH voted for Obama. Just not enough of them. Hillary's win is clearly in the polls they chose to ignore. No idy turnout - Hillary was slightly ahead.

I think it was 57% women earlier in the evening....not sure though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
34. Here's a clue as to why the polls were misleading
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
36. Invisible soccer grandmothers
who turned out in record numbers and then vanished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
42. Kids never vote. Grandmas always vote. That's how. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
43. Luck and the Big Dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
44. New Hampshire LOVES the Big Dog
They coronated him back in the day (McCain, too). The also love balanced budgets, and probably yearn for those days again. Bill came out the day before, got tons of media coverage with a "sobering" message - and people listened. Plus the % of women voting for Hillary. PLUS the splitting of the vote among people who don't want her as the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
46. Because Obamites predicted she would lose--and Obamites are always wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
47. Michael Whouley
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. Ya know, payback is always a bitch...
Those crying foul, claiming Diebold fixes, and the rest will be faced with exactly those charges if Edwards ever wins a primary. Guess, from the posters, that the next Obama win will also get a bit of static.

Everyone might just try and remember that your ox can also be gored. So always use a very small club when whacking the opposition.

In NH, Hillary won. Imagine that. Accept it. On to the next primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Satyagrahi Donating Member (254 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
49. Because negative campaigning works, perhaps?
These two mailers, for example, distorting Obama's record, misrepresenting his positions, the first targeting women (young women in particular) and the second independents:

Hillary Mailer Attacks Obama On Abortion
http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2008/01/hillary_mailer_hits_obama_on_abortion.php

On Eve Of Primary, Hillary Drops Negative Mailer Hitting Obama On Taxes
http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2008/01/on_eve_of_primary_hillary_drops_negative_mailer_hitting_obama_on_taxes.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #49
57. I know Obama is going
to learn from all of this and those negative attacks through the mail are just hillary's speed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
50. Looks like youth showed up again, but HRC got a lot of them.
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 05:11 PM by MGKrebs
http://futuremajority.com/node/888

"Clinton was able to narrow Obama's 57 - 10% lead {in Iowa} among 18 - 25 year olds to 60 - 22%, and, most incredibly, turn a 57 - 15% deficit among 25 - 29 year olds into a 37 - 34% victory over her rival."


"...72,041 young people made it to the ballot box on Tuesday, making up 16% of the total electorate."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerLaw2010 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
51. She received more votes than any other candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DivorcingNeo Donating Member (199 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
52. For the last time!
She won by three percentage points!

Barack has one delegate more than her. It's nothing to get upset about! Let's move forward...there's still a lot left to do!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
53. The polls A-L-L got it wrong and Diebold didn't... wait until November!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
54. ummm..cause the people thought she was a better candidate?
just a guess..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
58. She received more votes than your guy. Period. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC