Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Swing-State and Red-State DUers, Who Are You Supporting?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 02:08 PM
Original message
Poll question: Swing-State and Red-State DUers, Who Are You Supporting?
To me, I'm less curious about who the blue-state Dems are supporting. I want to know who swing-state and red-state Dems are supporting.

So, who is it?


Swing States:

Florida
Ohio
New Hampshire
Iowa
Minnesota
Wisconsin
New Mexico

Red States:

Anything else not above that's not a blue state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. You need more options
Kucinich is still in the race, and some of us are still undecided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. North Carolina for Edwards. nt/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadesOfGrey Donating Member (646 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. Same here! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Incomplete List of Swing States!
Edited on Sun Jan-13-08 02:20 PM by Kristi1696
Check this link to see if you're in a swing state:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swing_state

Swing States as of 2007

The following states are grouped by geographic regions: (in parenthesis are the total number of electoral votes allocated to that state, followed by the winning party in 2004)
Northeast
New Hampshire (4-D): Once very reliably Republican, New Hampshire became a swing state in the 1990s. Republicans still have somewhat of an edge in statewide elections, however the Democrats took control of the state legislature and both Congressional seats in 2006. The New Hampshire Republican Party tends to be more socially liberal than the national party, and as a result their behavior in national elections is harder to determine.

Pennsylvania (21-D): Pennsylvania is famously described by Democratic strategist James Carville as "you’ve got Philadelphia at one end of the state, Pittsburgh at the other end, and Alabama in the middle.”<5> Pennsylvania Secretary of the Commonwealth Pedro A. Cortés stated on March 17, 2007, that "The commonwealth’s large number of electoral college votes and diverse population make Pennsylvania a key battleground state." <6> Pennsylvania has leaned Democratic since 1992, giving its electoral votes to Bill Clinton (1992 and 1996), Al Gore (2000) and John Kerry (2004). President George W. Bush visited the state more than 40 times during his 2004 campaign.<7>


South
Arkansas (6-R): Although a conservative state in the heart of the Bible Belt, the Democratic Party is a powerful force in Arkansas and Democrats tend to have a comfortable advantage in statewide races. Presently, the Governor, both U.S. Senators, and 3 out of 4 of the Arkansas' House members are Democrats, and Democrats control the state legislature by a large margin. The Arkansas Democratic Party tends to be more conservative than the national party, however, and as a result voters there tend to be open to Republican Presidential candidates. Though favorite son Bill Clinton won Arkansas easily both times he ran, Arkansas gave their electoral votes to George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004 by a fairly large margin.

Florida (27-R): The outcome of the 2000 Presidential Election hung on a margin of roughly 500 votes in this state, and the fierce legal battles that ensued. Florida's electorate is balanced by heavily Democratic large cities like Miami and sparser, more Republican areas (the Florida Panhandle in this case). Republicans have been winning handily in statewide elections lately; however, the large Hispanic vote near Tampa and Orlando (particularly Puerto Ricans who tend to be the Democrats and have a significant presence in the Orlando area) provide Democrats an edge, but the Cuban-American vote is crucial near Miami; their votes gave an edge to George W. Bush over Al Gore in 2000.

Virginia (13-R): No Democratic presidential candidate has won Virginia since Lyndon Johnson's landslide victory in 1964, and it was the only Southern state that went Republican in 1976. Virginia is no longer as reliably Republican as it once was, as evidenced by two successive Democratic gubernatorial victories in 2001 and 2005 and Jim Webb's narrow victory in the 2006 Senate race against incumbent Republican George Allen. Also, Northern Virginia, the rapidly growing region of the state tends to lean Democratic.
September 13, 2007, former Virginia governor and Democrat Mark Warner announced he will run for the Senate in 2008 for the seat of retiring Senator John Warner. <1>


Midwest

Iowa (7-R): Al Gore won Iowa in 2000 by a razor-thin margin, and George W. Bush did the same four years later. The state's highly influential caucus makes Iowa the political holy grail of Republicans and Democrats alike.

Michigan (17-D): Michigan has generally tended to lean Democratic. One of the country's biggest centers of manufacturing, labor unions inevitably come into play, and the economic hard times the state has fallen on recently will no doubt be a major issue for the Great Lakes State in 2008. Republican strength tends to be primarily in the western portion of the lower peninsula of the state, particularly in the Grand Rapids Metropolitan area, which is also one of the fastest growing regions in the Midwest. The Democrats are strong in the Southeastern region of the state around the Metro Detroit area in particular and also around the Ann Arbor, Flint, and Saginaw areas as well.

Minnesota (10-D): Minnesota's transformation into a swing state is a surprising one, given how fervently Democratic the North Star State once was - it was the only state in the country that did not vote for Ronald Reagan in 1984. A strong tradition of populism and labor unions made it difficult for Republicans to have any real success there until recently; the recent competitiveness is due to the ever expanding suburbs of the Twin Cities and exurbs outside of the Twin Cities area. Republicans picked Saint Paul as the site for the 2008 Republican National Convention in September 2008.

Missouri (11-R): Missouri is geographically situated where the South, the Midwest, and the Great Plains meet, and is in many ways a microcosm of the entire country. Missouri has voted for the winner of every Presidential election since 1904 except in the year 1956, and voters there have proven themselves to be an effective gauge of the national mood. The "coastal" urban areas of St Louis and Kansas City, like urban areas elsewhere in the U.S., tend to lean strongly to the Democrats while the rural and suburban/exurban areas tend to lean to the Republicans.

Ohio: "I think 2008 is very likely to be a hotly contested race in Ohio," stated Eric Rademacher, director of the University of Cincinnati's Ohio Poll, for the Cincinnati Enquirer. <8> Its 20 electoral votes were critical to President Bush's reelection in 2004. In 2006, however, Ohio voters elected Democrats Ted Strickland and Sherrod Brown for Governor and U.S. Senator. The industrial urban areas of Cleveland, Dayton, Akron, and Youngstown tend to lean to the Democrats while the rural areas and the suburbs and exurbs (in particular around the ever growing Greater Cincinnati and Columbus areas) lean to the Republicans.

Wisconsin (10-D): Wisconsin has narrowly gone to Democratic candidates since 1988, which is somewhat ironic considering that the Republican Party was founded there. The Republicans lost their advantage in Wisconsin in the late 19th century when perceived nativist sentiments - particularly the Bennett Law - alienated the state's large German-American population. Southern Wisconsin has a strong progressive tradition, and elected the country's only current openly lesbian U.S. Congresswoman, Tammy Baldwin.


West/Pacific

Colorado (9-R): Once a reliable GOP stronghold, Colorado has moved towards the center during the last decade. With the victories of Ken Salazar to the U.S. Senate in 2004, Bill Ritter to the Governor's Mansion in 2006, and an additional U.S. House seat pick-up that same year, Democrats are finding themselves in a better position than before. Large Hispanic populations with strong penchant for populist themes makes this a true battleground state; nevertheless, Republicans still have a 100,000 registration edge against the Democrats. Democrats selected Denver as the site for the 2008 Democratic National Convention.

Nevada (5-R): Long considered a "fly-over" state due to its proximity to the populous state of California, the Silver State is once again looking like a strong swing state. Nevada's large Mormon population favors the GOP, but the presence of strong labor unions and Hispanic voters in Las Vegas and Reno sway those districts towards the Democrats. Populism plays well in this long-standing bastion of the GOP.

New Mexico (5-R): Personalities trump party affiliation in this classic swing state. New Mexico is truly politically divided, with registration amongst Democrats and Republicans nearly equal and the existence of a strong Independent voting bloc. The state went to Al Gore in 2000 by a mere 400 votes while George W. Bush carried it by a margin of 6000 votes in 2004.

Oregon (7-D): Intense beliefs in civil liberties and liberal stances on social issues such as abortion and gay rights make Oregon a Democratic-leaning state. On the other hand, Republican candidates are enthusiastic about the state's hostility to big government and federal control. The state has gone to the Democrats from the 1988 election onward.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Please update your poll so that it is ACCURATE.
Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. The most interesting thing on the wiki site you linked
to me, is this:

(see maps at the link)

"These maps show the amount of attention given to each state by the Bush and Kerry campaigns during the final five weeks of the 2004 election. At left, each waving hand represents a visit from a presidential or vice-presidential candidate during the final five weeks. At right, each dollar sign represents one million dollars spent on TV advertising by the campaigns during the same time period."

Notice that there are no waving hands and no $ signs in Virginia (or the Carolinas, thus next-to-no opportunities to capitalize on any Edwards advantage there). Now that VA is more purple, I hope resources will permit whoever is the 2008 candidate to devote some to VA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Incomplete list of candidates as well
Dennis Kucinich is still in this race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Florida for OBAMA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Other: Kucinich
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Can't decide between Obama and Edwards
The behavior of the Clintons these past couple weeks are pushing me toward Obama, but I hate to be basing my vote on stuff like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. i live in North Carolina
Edited on Sun Jan-13-08 02:19 PM by ccharles000
and support Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElizabethDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. Florida - Hillary. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. florida . . . for edwards.
Edited on Sun Jan-13-08 02:21 PM by ellenfl
it will be an interesting primary here. ;-)

ellen fl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. I voted for Edwards since you you didn't give a Kucinich option
I'm in one of the few real red states left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. I support Edwards but it won't make any difference
The fix is already in for DLC candidate A or DLC candidate B.

I'm left with no choice at all. What's the word for that? Disenfranchised!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. Florida...............Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandaasu Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. Kansas: Obama (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
18. PA: Obama
Edited on Sun Jan-13-08 03:34 PM by MH1
on edit, sorry I didn't see you listed states... I've always thought PA was a swing state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
protect our future Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Missouri. Obama.
How could anyone leave off Missouri from the swing-state list? It's bluer now than in '04 when it went for Bush. The change is probably due to the efforts of Claire McCaskill and to the fact that the Republican governor seems to be driving Missouri downward so fast that the state is getting closer to the bottom, or actually at the bottom now, of our 50 states in several categories. The previous governor, Democrat Bob Holden, somehow produced job growth here, and somehow we felt we were holding on and things were not so bad. Holden had some good ideas to produce more jobs and more revenue for the state, but the Republican legislature stopped him cold on almost everything and overrode Holden's veto on something very crucial. (At least that is the way I remember it, without doing any research to support what I just stated.) Now Missouri is depopulating, losing residents to surrounding states, all of which have a better economy. Health care: 400,000 Missourians thrown off of Medicaid or had their benefits reduced under our current Republican governor. Education: Huge chunk of bucks removed from the state organization that provides decent college loans.

And my house. I used to have about 18% equity. Under Matt Blunt's leadership, I now have about minus 55% equity, best guesstimate, after talking at length to my lender. In other words, my home which I love is now worth somewhere around half of what I owe on it. Don't think I'll have much success shopping for a refi, which I need in two years. Oh well, I've lived on the streets before and I'm sure I can do it again. It builds character, anyway. Acorn here is attempting to do something about the foreclosure situation and I hope they succeed. If they do, I'll probably be fine.

But it is definitely time for a regime change here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC