Is this forum an example of the "unity" that Obama promises?

If he can't bring together Democrats, how does he expect us to buy his schtick about how we can do better?

There is no right, there is no left, we are one people
there are no red states , there are no blue states, this is the United States

blah,blah,blah......


oh,yeah-- yes, we can. woo hoo.





edit to change is to are.

then what do you really expect to happen?

This forum is not an example of anything.

:rofl: indeed.

buddy, buddy, cumbaya?

if you haven't noticed.

I think that the Hillary Chicken came before the Obama egg.

It is Hillary doing a bunch of talking about these matters, not Obama.

and you will hang you head down in shame. Until then, just like Hillary and her IWR support, you will have none.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4052491

should pay attention to their own psyche and not try to diagnose others


It makes you look silly

what does that have to say about the sincerity of their belief in what their candidate stands for?

about some 'supporters' slinging shit about every single democratic representative (or anyone else for that matter) who dares to endorse a candidate, other their own? 'You' would be far more credible if your shit wasn't flung so far and so wide. But I do not think that is any reflection on 'your' candidate. It just reveals who 'you' are.

but the neocons do..

..maybe you should space your shit-flinging a little more...too easy.

think, b4 u post.

Hey, the good news is that yours is another perfect example of how any criticism of Obama is called racism.

Don't answer that, thanks.

Ignore

"very apt user name...." How so? Is that supposed to be some kind of silly insult?

Sonotcool47, just small and petty

The truth hurts. And it hurts Hillary the most.

Her divisive character and some of her followers and surrogates bring out the worst in people. She attacks Obama for his kindergarden paper ferchrissakes! Who can honestly support someone with that level of tripe?

but merely one of three vying to be the shephard.

you know, white dude, Opie haircut, used to have a thing on his lip. I saw his face on a milk carton the other day.

Primary time is always horrendous here.

And it's not like Obama runs DU.

What the heck was that?

What with this being DU, not OU.

in unspecified ways that can only be detailed at the unspecified appropriate moment.

Is this forum an example of the "unity" that any candidate promises?

If she/he can't bring together Democrats, how does he/she expect us to buy her/his schtick about how we can do better?

I mean, if a candidate can't even unite DU, how can we expect anything out of them?

smears and jeers from her players.

It's a brilliant strategy. :thumbsup:

telling them to get over themselves and quit the fights of the 60's. He regularly uses RW talking points to attack fellow Dems and to dismiss issues that go to the core values of the Democratic Party, to our very souls.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2676101

that we need to stop living in the past and start addressing the issues of a new century and the generation to follow us. I don't know about you, but I'm sure as hell sick of squabbling over the Vietnam war. Damn it, I want to see those struggles of the last century actualized in this new century, and I can see that there are those who have a definite interest in maintaining divisions and hatred in this nation. Nothing like nourishing corruption, is there.

This is not about living in the past. It is about continuing to stand for what we believe in, do keep what was hard earned in the 60's and 70's from being further eroded. Did you read the other thread?

Do you think we can even get back to where we were pre-W without fights?

I prefer Edwards and have tried to remain positive about each of our candidates. A couple of weeks ago I started exploring why Obama did not resonate with me, why I found most of speeches rather boring in an "I've heard all this before" and "Where's the beef" way. As a result of my digging into this, I now have moved Obama to the very bottom of my list of Dem candidates. I am not happy about this result.

Who was on the right side of the Vietnam war.

I think those groups who have been dumped on during the past few administrations (Clinton included because there were some policies that came out of those years that were detrimental) unite. I think the Clintons have purposefully and tactically introduced fights which did not have to be fought. I like both Obama and Edwards and they are my preferred ticket. A constitutional scholar and a lawyer who has fought in the trenches for consumers combined would be a formidable ticket. This nation has more than enough problems right now to focus on and the Boomers are starting to die out. Our generation has much to make right before it shuffles off this mortal coil. Repairing the damage done to the constitution and to restoring some balance between business and workers in this nation and developing healthy international relations are critical. Time is slipping away.. As far as the Clintons are concerned, I don't care to spend the next four or eight years with reporters frankly running around trying to trip Bill up (and you know they'll do it) or the RW trying to rehash every scandal they can dig up to reopen old wounds. It is not constructive.

'course I don't believe that either...but see how it can be turned around? It's a bogus argument.

:rofl:

Now Obama is responsible for your being divisive and nasty? Too funny.

:rofl:

... HRC and Obama are peas in a pod. Neither is going to do jack shit to piss of their corporate masters.

It cracks me up that one team can claim some kind of advantage over the other. Both candidates SUCK.