Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which is MOST important to you?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 05:55 PM
Original message
Poll question: Which is MOST important to you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. The nominee who comes closest to my views has the best chance of winning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. If a candidate cannot do a good job, why elect him/her?
What is the point of electing someone solely because they can win if, upon winning, they will be incapable of doing a good job?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WHEN CRABS ROAR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Where do I mark ALL OF THEM !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. I want the Democrat with the most chance of winning
does anyone really know who that is yet?

I hope we find out pretty soon.

In the meantime, I'm voting for Kucinich in my very late primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wow... option four is UGLY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. And yet, four people chose it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. It's called affirmative action
If you don't compromise a tiny bit to break the race or gender barrier, then it will always be hard for blacks and women to get the funding and support necessary to run a campaign. When the door is open, then more and more qualified people of color and women will run for the Presidency. I'm not saying you should support Alan Keyes, but in my view if one thinks that the black or woman candidate have 95% of what the white male candidate has, then one should consider taking an affirmative action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. It's not hard for either Obama or Clinton to get funding...
so... why is Affirmative Action necessary in picking our nominee this year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. How many blacks and women have we had in the past?
How many others are there? Blacks and women are severely underrepresented in the political sphere. It's still a largely white male world. Yes, progress has been made, but after 230 years, my God, don't you think that the candidates in both parties should reflect the diversity of the US?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. What? You mean black or female candidates?
I certainly don't think any of them didn't get the nom due to their skin color or gender.

And no, I think the candidates should reflect the values of the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yes, the candidates should reflect the values of the Party
That's first and foremost, but there is a range of values. As long as women and people of color can't demonstrate their electability, they are less likely to run and less likely to get funding. Why else would we have such a disproportion of white men in politics? Surely you don't think that white men are simply better politicians, do you? I think it's because of institutionalized prejudice, and that's what I think we need to overcome. If we do, then our choice of candidates will increase two or three fold, since it will include a proportionate number of women, people of color, gays, etc., groups which are largely excluded right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think that any one of the top three candidates will make a good
President, therefore, I want our nominee to be the one with the best chance of winning. I believe it is imperative that we have a Democratic President along with a Democratic majority in Congress if we are going to get our country going back in the right direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. 8% chose the bigot option even at very progressive DU. How sad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC