Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can someone please explain how MSNBC was allowed to break the law?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
penguin7 Donating Member (962 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:09 AM
Original message
Can someone please explain how MSNBC was allowed to break the law?
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 12:25 AM by penguin7
I know that there a gazillion lawyers here. How was MSNBC allowed to break the law? The law is that there must be pre-established criteria before a debate. MSNBC issued an invitation to Kucinich and then rescinded the invitation. Kucinich met the pre-established criteria and then MSNBC changed the criteria. Thus either this law is complete nonsense or MSNBC broke the law. Will someone please explain how MSNBC can be allowed to break the law?

http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14feb20071500/edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2007/janqtr/11cfr110.13.htm

"c) Criteria for candidate selection. For all debates, staging
organization(s) must use pre-established objective criteria to determine
which candidates may participate in a debate. For general election
debates, staging organizations(s) shall not use nomination by a
particular political party as the sole objective criterion to determine
whether to include a candidate in a debate. For debates held prior to a
primary election, caucus or convention, staging organizations may
restrict candidate participation to candidates seeking the nomination of
one party, and need not stage a debate for candidates seeking the
nomination of any other political party or independent candidates."

How did the government allow MSNBC to get away with breaking the law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Owned by military industrial complex criminal member, GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spag68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Option a, the law is bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC