Bigdog looks like a voter disenfranchiser now.

The people have won, and the DLC Clintonite voter disenfranchisers have lost.
The courts show that all that bigdog angry rhetoric is bogus!

....by their work supervisors if they stand in the wrong part of the room.

One more thing.....How do you have a recount if that election, I mean caucus is suspicious?

Which voters are threatened?

....in Obama's corner, glaring at you, as you attempt to move over to Hillary's corner....Get the picture?

Cannot happen, you say? I think it can and it will.

What does that have to do with the lawsuit trying to close caucus locations???

...voter suppression is blatantly enforced with voters having to make a public selection in the workplace in front of their co-workers and supervisors.

Why even let them vote if they won't vote for Hillary?
Do they even deserve to live?

I spent almost 20 years as a voting rights activist, all the while registered as an independent.

My stand on election and voting rights are the same and apply equally to any political party or to its adherents whether I agree with them or not..

Read what I state and not what you want to hear. It doesn't matter who wins the caucuses. They are the wrong way in this republic which was founded and evolved into equal voting rights for all.

I am supporting Hillary Clinton, for now. But I will not be deterred by anyone in my defense of voting rights - for everyone.

You act like people don't regularly caucus with co-workers. Some do live near each other. Also, these caucuses are giving people the option to caucus, who would normally not get the option to caucus because they have to work. You think it is ok that Bill wants to keep voters from caucusing because the caucus system is fucked up with to begin with. Closing caucusing locations keeps people from voting...plain and simple.

....but when you cast your vote, you do it in private, and in secret.

Caucuses, as we know them here, are violative of sacred basic principles of self-governance. Voting for leaders in the openness of such caucuses leaves the voter under the possible threat of reprisals in his workplace.

Come on ! It's not that fucking difficult to grasp!

Unless the labor boss is also scheduled to work at the casino on Saturday morning at noon....:eyes:

Personally, I don't give a flying f who is glaring at me. Fuck em.

This is why we have secret ballots now in the US.

:eyes:

WE don't all have secret ballots

and some of US prefer it that way

The whole nation does -- we use the Australian system because of voter intimidation in the old days.

I don't like the NV lawsuit, but I also don't like the pledge card crap, either. NV isn't Iowa... and you know I'm not a Freeper.

Actually Iowa doesn't have secret ballots (well, the GOP does but us Democrats don't) So you DON'T like Iowa - really! x(

Pledge cards are nothing more than information gatherers - people fill them out but they don't equal votes. The caucus-goer can choose who to support at the time of the first alignment (and if necessary can change their support upon realignment). No pledge card can make them support anyone they don't want to. It's their choice.

The reason I don't like the NV lawsuit is WHEN it was filed. The people who filed it WROTE and voted on that they are now complaining are BAD! :wow: And those rules were approved by the NSDP and the Nevada Attorney General's Office AND the DNC. Little late to cry in their Corn Flakes NOW! :cry:

Anyway - we are enemies when it comes to the caucuses - I like them and you are a pissant :hi:





(oh, and I'm kidding about the pissant comment...but not the shit magnet one! :hug:)

"How do you have a recount if that election, I mean caucus is suspicious?"

That is just stupid.
In a caucus, you don't vote anonymously.
There is no chance for votes to be flipped, destroyed, or created by a machine.

Try again.

Thought not.

In about 5 minutes the Clinton campaign will start sending surrogates claiming how proud they are of "their great victory in supporting the union movement which is what Hillary has been doing for 35 years as she prepares herself to be prepared on day one while she wasn't doing something bad during her teenage years"

wins no one over.Obama's "New politics"

... more "nyah, nyah!"

:eyes:

--p!

Court Doc. Just in case anyone cares to read.

http://media.lasvegassun.com/media/pdfs/2008/01/16/OppoDemsMTNRelief.pdf

This latest in the line of disenfranchisement efforts is just another example.

Obama and the Culinary Workers won. That's how it goes...

But he needs to step back for a bit, I heard that they've just put his legacy on life support.

Tee hee. It didn't stay in Vegas.

:hi:

He had so much respect from so many people BEFORE this race began.

What they're doing to this party is disgraceful. I don't know what is wrong with the people who refuse to see it.

It was obvious the courts would throw this stupid lawsuit out.

Shameful