Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton Channeling Bush?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 07:41 AM
Original message
Clinton Channeling Bush?
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2008/01/message-guru-by-digby-well-sadly-it.html
From TNR about a Clinton mailer

In this mailer, however, it's Clinton's rhetoric that's worrisome. It attacks Obama because "Nevada families need to keep more of their hard-earned dollars -- not less..." and "We need a President that will help hard-working families keep more of what they earn..."

And Digby comment.

It's actually worse than that. It's repeating that stupid Bush mantra, "it's your money!"

THE PRESIDENT: If they have less money in their pocket, they may not come here. And so I worked with the Congress -- I want to thank Congressman Ehrlich, when he was in the Congress, now Governor Ehrlich. We cut taxes on people. It's your money to begin with, by the way. You've got more money to spend. And when you have more money to spend, it increases demand for a good or a service. And when that demand increases for a good or a service, somebody has to produce it.
...
I'm, awfully glad to see that guy doing the messaging for the Democratic primaries this year, aren't you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. I just cannot stand the thought of 8 more years of this. Not just the
channeling, but the dirty politics and the 'win at any cost' attitude. Can't do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Clinton has been channeling * for sometime now.
And actively enabling his agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. That's A Disgusting Assertion
Take it back.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. The son he always wanted
Can't you see them together, building sand castles on the beach and Poppy patting Billy on the head?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Essene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. Clinton as centrist? Clinton praising Reagan? Clinton talking like a GOPer? NEVER
Nope... only the evil Obama does that.

Clinton never does anything like this... nor does she engage in voter suppression tactics or race baiting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. This wouldn't be a feeble attempt to distract us from Obama's "Reagan screw-up," would it?
Edited on Fri Jan-18-08 07:52 AM by Perry Logan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. The Discovery That Obama Fanatasizes About Reagan During Man-On-Dog Sex?
Yes, you've caught the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. No, it comes from Digby, who also condemns the Obama attempt to channel Reagan, but
is honest enough to look at both sides. I know honesty is a value difficult to understand for some people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The operative word is "feeble."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Nah, this is feeble:
http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/14266.html

The Clinton campaign hits the worst conservative frame yet
Posted January 17th, 2008 at 11:12 am

snip//

Is it hypocritical? Shamelessly. Clinton has publicly conceded that she’s open to the exact same policy proposal Obama has made. If she’s attacking his willingness to raise the payroll cap, she’s attacking her own willingness to raise the payroll cap.

And does it help or hurt the party’s broader message? It undoubtedly hurts. Clinton’s mailing could have just as easily been written by the Republican National Committee or Grover Norquist. Clinton is using anti-tax rhetoric that Democrats usually reject as nonsense, not embrace as fodder for attacks against other Democrats. Talk about Dems using conservative frames, this is Exhibit A.

Obviously, politics ain’t beanbag. Clinton, Obama, and Edwards are going to take rhetorical shots at one another, and some of them are going to be cheaper than others. I get it.

But this mailing is really offensive from a Democratic perspective. When the Clinton campaign used it in New Hampshire, I’d hoped it was borne of desperation and wouldn’t be repeated. That’s it’s now become a standard arrow in Clinton’s quiver is deeply disappointing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. No
Nothing as cynical as that has happened here in GDP ever. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
10. Obama Channeling Nixon, Regan, and Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FunkyLeprechaun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. How is that channelling Bush, Nixon, Bush II, or Reagan?
The point is that Hillary turns off enough Republicans and Independents (who are absolutely disgusted with this presidency) to not vote for her.

If Edwards drops out, Edward's supporters should back Obama. If Obama likewise, Obama's supporters should back Edwards.

Obama's my first choice, followed by Edwards. I am NOT advocating Edwards to drop out of the race, I am merely suggesting that if he did his supporters should back Obama. I will support Edwards if Obama drops out.

My mum (who became a citizen in 2000) told me she WILL NOT vote for Hillary if she gets the nom. I had considered holding my nose and having a boiling hot shower to cleanse myself after voting for her if she got the nom. The more I watch this election, the more I agree with my mum.

Really... she is one of the most divisive candidates in this race. She made it about gender when she weeped before New Hampshire, she made it about race when she said it took a president (LBJ) to pass the Civil Rights Act (never mind the achievements of MLK, Jr., Rosa Parks, etc), what's next? It's her that keeps bringing these issues up and trying to blame Obama. She is trying to hurt Obama (look at the teachers union on Nevada versus the Culinary workers).

I agree with Obama big time on the Reagan issue. Reagan, while not a very good president (probably an understatement!), was very charismatic. That's how he got elected and that's why Republicans to this day think of St. Ronnie of Ray-gun. And they're bringing out all these dried old farts while we've got two hot young things on our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I'll tell you why I'm pissed.
Edited on Fri Jan-18-08 10:46 AM by SIMPLYB1980
It's pandering to Fucking Nazis. Now I'm not saying that all people that voted for the Republicans are Fascist, but the people they vote for shore are. Mean wile Obama is talking about the excess of the 60's and 70's. Throwing gay people, and boomer's under the buss, telling us that all the fights Democrats have been supporting since Nixon trying to bring some sanity back to our government were petty, and with one stupid Pandering comment, not to mention all the ones in his book, Obama has shown his true side. Not to mention this, and don't give me that Obama has apologized shit this is disgusting.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FunkyLeprechaun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I'm not trying to argue with you
There's plenty of former Republicans who now vote Democratic and heavily back Democrats. So are you saying that someone like Kos (of DailyKos) is a fascist because he supported Reagan in the 1980s? That happened 20 years ago, people have changed BIG time (Look at David Brock as well).

Now there are Republicans who now are anti-Bush, even though they voted for him twice. However, could you see an ex-Republican-who-voted-Bush-twice voting for Hillary? If McCain gets the nomination, I would expect those ex-Republicans shun Hillary and vote for him instead (after all he's the guy that Bush slammed in 2000). Which isn't a good thing for her.

I really don't get your ramblings here... all I can see is Obama is a bridge for all voters and that's very good for him. The cartoon really does hit the nail on the head, I don't see how that is a disagreement to Obama or to my statement.

Reagan was indeed charismatic but he was a shitty president! But his charisma did fool voters. The Republicans did the same with Bush... it was really unfortunate that Gore was portrayed as "stiff" throughout his VP term and even in his early days as Dem Nominee. Bush? They said he was a guy to have a beer with. Right there, they portrayed Bush as "charismatic" and Gore as not. They did the same for Kerry even though we knew Bush was a dumbass by 2004. They used his dumbassery this time, as the "simple" voters went out for him in 2004.

Right now, Hillary's tactics aren't winning points with me. And I really cannot see her easily winning the presidency if she were to get the nomination (it'll be a very close race).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. HIll's volunteers have that beat all hollow with their sending out Muslim smears
about Obama, and there were three of them that did that compared to one volunteer for Obama who made those fliers up. I defended Clinton over that becsause she didn't deserve to be blamed for what volunteer coordinators did on their own. You might take a clue...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Getting desperate calling me one of Hill's volunteers cali.
Edited on Fri Jan-18-08 01:15 PM by SIMPLYB1980
How often do you post on here?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. oh for pity's sake. I was not calling you one of Hill's volunteers
I was referring to three volunteer coordinators out in Iowa who forwarded an ugly "Obama is a stealth Muslim" email. Try reading for comprehension.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynnertic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. maybe she just borrowed his wire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC