Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's Economic Stimulus Package: The Death of Supply Side

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:01 PM
Original message
Bush's Economic Stimulus Package: The Death of Supply Side
While a lot of us mock the economic stimulus package presented today by Bush, it is interesting what he is essentially admitting: Supply Side didn't work.

Think about what he is proposing for the most part. He is proposing a massive series of tax rebates to boost consumer spending to shore up the demand side of the economy. In this is a tacit admission that the supply side policies of the past several years have failed to create sustainable growth and a good old Keynesian stimulus plan of deficit spending(or short term tax cuts) aimed at the consumer end of the economy is the best way to get us out of this funk.

This is a great day, though I have to admit it comes at the worst of times. We do have an implicit repudiation of the central guiding theme of the Republican Party's economic policies from their own president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. As I think this is very important *kick*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crazylikafox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ironic, isn't it? The week that democrats start praising Regan.
Will we ever learn?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm not going to go there. My views on that one are clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Also Known as "Trickle-Down"
and we all know WHAT trickles down.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. In 8 or 10 years, they'll bring it back, packaged as something else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Of course, but for the time being I think we have driven it back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. i had the same thought. he's giving a handout to the little guy!
he'll be kicked out of the old repug boys club for that. :evilgrin: total repudiation of trickle down. i'm lovin' it.

ellen fl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. The mistake you are making
You are assuming that the economic conservative philosophy is somehow based on rational thinking. If it were, simple empirical analysis would have told them by now that their supply side hypotheses were incorrect. While there are some distinct differences between economic conservatives and social conservatives, in my opinion there is one unifying factor: faith. Supply side economics is faith based, they believe it _should_ work regardless of if it does, it is somehow a "superior" strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I don't care what they think. They have disproved their own theories now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Exactly, years ago I got into debates with several Repugs over it.
I went to the IRS and downloaded a spreadsheet with the revenue streams to government broken out. I normalized it to the consumer price index and showed them empirically that Reagan's tax cuts did not result in an increase in revenue. However, his tax increases did result in increase in revenue. He increased the SS tax, excise taxes, capital gains tax, and removed loopholes in the corporate tax. You can see increases in revenue for those categories categories after he signed each of those increases into law.

They didn't believe it since the executive branch was controlled by Clinton at the time this spreadsheet was published. They claimed that the IRS data was manipulated to make Reagan look bad. They also didn't believe that Reagan increased taxes. Even when I pointed out the legislation and comments by David Stockton on how the Reagan administration was freaking out over the lack of revenue growth. It is definitely a matter of faith for them.

BTW, here's a great article on Reagan by Joshua Green in the Washington Monthly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I did the same thing pretty much, got the same result.
They don't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yes, he's by his actions admitting: trickle down is a massive failure.. bubble up is what works.
Which Clinton also knew, and put into practice to great effect. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. This is yet more evidence to a strong case!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC