Obama has every NV advantage after disenfranchising teachers. What will he blame his FAILURE on?

If Obama loses, what will his excuse be?

He got a big endorsement, succeeded in helping to preserve a one man five vote scheme that was to his advantage, and put out dishonest attack ads.

If he loses there will only be one reason: incompetence as a candidate.

How will he try to spin it? There will be no excuse except that he failed miserably.

find out they can't caucus at work. Obama is FUCKED!

My mom taught in public school for 25 years, my sister is a teacher, my brother a former teacher.

They don't work on Saturdays unless you mean voluntarily.

:rofl:

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

she's been ahead in NV for months.

Why is it that Hillary goes down in the polls so much when people get to know Obama better?

:rofl:

Why can't a former first lady with the backing of the last Democratic President win by more than 2 points and come in third in Iowa against a political newcomer? Pretty pathetic considering all the cards she has stacked in her favor.

:rofl:

weird

Like he did in NH.

Hillary was ahead there for months. It was her "firewall." She almost lost.

He'll likely lose to the HillaryInc machine there. I'm just hoping he can make it close in the end.

don't give up!

probably will just go vote "present" again - so as not to actually be on the record or anything, you know...

maybe he'll use the same "excuse" for Nevada.

...but that's an issue for next election.

Let's just wait and see if he does lose, m'kay?

There was an arrangement made by Democrats in NV, INCLUDING HRC supporters, agreed upon unanimously in March of 07. Four of those who WERE at the meeting where this was agreed upon then, after the Culinary Workers' Union endorsed Obama, joined the lawsuit by HRC allies who controlled one of the state's teachers' unions.

Neither of the teachers' unions NOR any significant group of teachers cited anywhere in the controversy or in the extensive discussion of this on DU have EVER raised ANY objection for nine months UNTIL THE CWU endorsed Obama.

To suggest that Obama disenfranchised teachers is, under these facts, an out and out lie, and the kind of trollagerie that I have spoken about being a rampant, and largely unaddressed issue at DU. Of late, there has been more of a consciousness of this problem, but there needs to be a deeper understanding and more concerted efforts by rank and file DUers.

It was an indicative embarassment that arguments Kucinich saw as being valid were dismissed officially and out of hand by those administrating DU as not even being of ARGUABLE validity. That isn't to claim that the election was stolen, only to maintain a healthy skepticism.

At the same time as discussion of exit polls diverging from reported election results -- recognized FOR OTHER COUNTRIES as the best way to tell if there's been election fraud was squashed, trollagerie abounds on the board, in particular corners, without even any administrative COMMENT, let alone action. The inconsistency is glaring and in itself very telling.

The proof is in the pudding, oh, and in my sig line.