Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nevada really is a lot different from Democrats’ first two states (great #s graphic)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 09:31 AM
Original message
Nevada really is a lot different from Democrats’ first two states (great #s graphic)
Source: Las Vegas Sun

The significance of Nevada’s presidential caucus, hailed as the “first in the West,” goes beyond the state’s place on a map.

Differences between the sites of the first two Democratic contests and No. 3 Nevada abound a distinction largely responsible for the Silver State having been the focus of American presidential politics for the past 10 days.

Nevada has a level of racial and ethnic diversity not found in Iowa or New Hampshire. Recent U.S. Census Bureau estimates put the Hispanic population here at more than 600,000, close to one-quarter of the state’s population far more than in Iowa and New Hampshire, where 93 percent and 95 percent of the residents are white.

Nevada also has a highly transient population. Since 2000 the state has grown by nearly 30 percent, adding more than 500,000 residents, even with the steady flow of people packing up and heading elsewhere.

Read more: http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008/jan/19/nevada-really-lot-different-democrats-first-two-st/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. I believe that is way NV was allowed to have such an early primary-its cultural makeup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for the post. Good demographic overview and interactive
map thing with voter breakdown.

(aside) Anecdotally, I've heard of a lot of Californians relocating to NV recently, fwiw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rock_Garden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-19-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Do you think that casino growth accounts for that 30% increase?
That's a huge population shift.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC