Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Flashback: Reagan makes King holiday official

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:00 PM
Original message
Flashback: Reagan makes King holiday official
Edited on Mon Jan-21-08 12:02 PM by ProSense

Flashback: Reagan makes King holiday official


President Ronald Reagan signs legislation creating the Martin Luther King
Jr. federal holiday as Coretta Scott King, the civil-right's leader's widow,
watches, Nov. 2, 1983. Reagan Presidential Library.


by Frank James

Given the New Hampshire comments by Sen. Hillary Clinton about it taking a president to make dreams a legislative reality, for which she was excoriated by some of Sen. Barack Obama's supporters, and Obama's Nevada comments about Reagan being a transformational president, for which he was castigated by Sen. Clinton, her husband former President Bill Clinton and others, this seemed like an appropriate photo to run today.

more


Note:

John McCain Refuses to Fire South Carolina Spokesman Who Founded A Confederate Heritage Magazine And Wrote Against MLK Holiday. Quinn was the editor in chief of The Southern Partisan magazine, which was described by Vanity Fair as "rabidly devoted to the South's Confederate heritage." In a 1983 column arguing against the recognition of Martin Luther King Day, Quinn wrote, "King Day should have been rejected because its purpose is vitriolic and profane." As recently as December 23, 2005, Richard Quinn was identified as "McCain's South Carolina spokesman." A 2004 Vanity Fair piece on McCain's fall in the 2000 campaign identified Quinn as "the McCain (2000) campaign's South Carolina strategist." (The State, 2/9/01, Partisan View, Southern Partisan, Fall, 1983, Spartanburg Herald-Journal, 12/23/05; Vanity Fair, 11/04)


McCain • Voted against a bill declaring the third Monday in January a federal holiday honoring Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

Taylor Marsh smears Obama, praises McCain's character




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Reagan Had To Be Dragged Kicking And Screaming To Sign The Bill Into Law
He implied that Dr. King had communist sympathies and "that we would find out in fifty years when FBI files were opened...

I'm looking for the citation now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Citation
Senator Jesse Helms (R-North Carolina) led opposition to the bill and questioned whether King was important enough to receive such an honor. He also criticized King's opposition to the Vietnam War and accused King of having communist connections.

Ronald Reagan was also opposed to the holiday. He relented in his opposition only after Congress passed the King Day bill with an overwhelming veto-proof majority (338 to 90 in the House of Representatives and 78 to 22 in the Senate). =June 8, 1999}}</ref> Prior to that date, New Hampshire and Arizona had not observed the day. Throughout the 1990s, this was heavily criticized. After a 1992 proposition to recognize the holiday in Arizona did not pass, the NFL boycotted hosting Super Bowl XXVII at Sun Devil Stadium in Tempe. <4> The hip-hop group Public Enemy recorded a song titled "By The Time I Get To Arizona", on their 1991 album Apocalypse 91... The Enemy Strikes Black, in which they describe assassinating Arizona Governor Fife Symington III for his opposition to the holiday.

http://www.google.com/search?q=did+ronald+reagan+imply+martin+luther+king+was+a+communist&hl=en&start=30&sa=N


We saw an example of this power when Ronald Reagan, after seeming to publicly endorse. Jesse Helms’s suggestion that Martin Luther King was a Communist, ...



http://muse.jhu.edu/login?uri=/journals/language/v077/77.3frazer02.pdf

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. Sigh...those who don't know history...State Rights Raygun - hero of civil rights!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. His record was horrible, but he did what he did
Supported Bob Jones Univ.’s miscegeny policy, inadvertently
The president was so cut off from the counsel of black Americans that he sometimes did not even realize when he was offending them. One example occurred when Reagan sided with Bob Jones University in a lawsuit to obtain federal tax exemptions that had been denied by the IRS. The IRS denied tax exemptions to segregated private schools. Many of them were schools such as Bob Jones University, which enrolled a handful of minority students but prohibited interracial dating and marriage. It was the basis of this discrimination that the IRS denied the tax exemption.

Reagan would later say that the case had never been presented to him as a civil rights issue. More astonishingly, he did not even know that many Christian schools practiced segregation.
Source: The Role of a Lifetime, by Lou Cannon, p.521-22 Jul 2, 1991

Promised to appoint a female Justice; O’Connor was the first
Reagan changed the Supreme Court. He appointed the first woman to the high court, Sandra Day O’Connor, fulfilling a pledge he had made during a low point of his 1980 presidential campaign. Reagan’s strategists came up with the idea of putting a woman on the Supreme Court.
Source: The Role of a Lifetime, by Lou Cannon, p. 804 Jul 2, 1991


Opposed Voting Rights Act of 1965 as “humiliating to South”
Reagan never supported the use of federal power to provide blacks with civil rights. He opposed the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965. Reagan said in 1980 that the Voting Rights Act had been “humiliating to the South.” While he made political points with white southerners on this issue, he was sensitive to any suggestion that his stands on civil rights issues were politically or racially motivated, and he typically reacted to such criticisms as attacks on his personal integrity.
Source: The Role of a Lifetime, by Lou Cannon, p. 520 Jul 2, 1991

Supports constitutional amendment to allow prayer in schools
When our Founding Fathers passed the First Amendment, they never intended to construct a wall between government and religious belief. The Supreme Court opens its proceedings with a religious invocation. Congress opens sessions with a prayer. I believe the schoolchildren of the United States are entitled to the same privileges. I sent the Congress a constitutional amendment to restore prayer to public schools. I am calling on the Congress to act speedily and to let our children pray.
Source: Speech in Orlando Florida Mar 8, 1983

more



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #23
38. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. But Clinton couldn't be dragged away from signing DOMA. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Do You Know How Many Senators Voted For DOMA Including Paul Wellstone?
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. And I Apologize If I Exposed Ronald Reagan
Edited on Mon Jan-21-08 12:26 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
I didn't mean to offend you...

Please accept my apology....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Bwa ha ha ha
Reagan was awful , that doesn't make Clinton wonderful.

Signing a GOOD bill after being "dragged kicking and screaming" is BETTER than signing a BAD bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. Great Point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. John Kerry voted against it.
So does that mean Wellstone was a homophobe, or spineless?

If DU existed then, I can guarantee there'd have been 1000 threads saying he was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. And that did NOT mean Clinton had to sign it, did it?
Make those b*****s override the veto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. If that bill had not become law with President Clinton's signature in 1996 if would have become law
Edited on Mon Jan-21-08 01:09 PM by Freddie Stubbs
President Dole's signature in 1997.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
29. Which is why you know he will throw gays under the bus again
if he feels it is politically expedient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Would you have prefered President Dole to have singed that law?
Clinton vetoed several bill in his second term which Dole would have likely signed: Partial Birth Abortion Ban, Vouchers for DC School Students, Yucca Mountain, and Bankruptcy Reform to name a few. Had he vetoed DOMA, he likely would not have been reelected and those bills would have become law under Dole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. They Seem To Like Reagan... Why Would They Dislike Dole?
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Actually I don't know if that would have given Dole the Presidency.
Edited on Mon Jan-21-08 01:27 PM by dkf
I do know that he will go against gay rights if it doesn't work for him politically.

That is a fact.

It is actually a question for the gay community...Would you prefer Clinton put his Presidency at risk, as did Lyndon Johnson for Blacks, or would you prefer he not sign it and he retain power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #9
33. Clinton won by a pretty significant margin over Dole
I have a hard time believing that he couldn't have been re-elected if he'd vetoed Helms-Burton and DOMA. Welfare Reform was such a major campaign issue that I'll agree he had no choice to sign it before the election even with all of the crap the Republicans put in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day
Edited on Mon Jan-21-08 12:23 PM by no name no slogan
Making MLK day legal was once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. It Passed With Veto Proof Majorities
On the day of the bill's passing he was asked about Jesse Helms' remarks that Dr. King was a communist sympathizer...Reagan said "we'll find out in about fifty years", alluding the opening of sealed FBI files...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. and it was under protest too! "but, but the costs...!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Yeah, the costs!
Like one more day off for government workers is going to break the bank. OH NOES!!! TEH DEFFICITS!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Here
On August 2, 1983, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill creating a legal public holiday in honor of the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. Although there had been little discussion of the bill in the House itself and little awareness among the American public that Congress was even considering such a bill, it was immediately clear that the U.S. Senate sould take up the legislation soon after the Labor Day recess.

The House had passed the King Holiday Bill by an overwhelming vote of 338-90, with significant bipartisan support (both Reps. Jack Kemp and Newt Gingrich voted for it), and the Reagan administration was indicating that the president would not veto it if it came before him. In these circumstances, most political observers seemed to think that Senate enactment and presidential signature of the bill would take place virtually unopposed; few anticipated that the battle over the King holiday in the next few weeks would be one of the most bitter congressional and public controversies of the decade.

From 1981 to 1986 I worked on the staff of North Carolina Republican Sen. John P. East, a close associate and political ally of the senior senator from North Carolina, Jesse Helms. While the legislation was being considered I wrote a paper entitled "Martin Luther King, Jr.: Political Activities and Associations." It was simply documentation of the affiliations with various individuals and organizations of communist background that King had maintained since the days when he first became a nationally prominent figure.

In September, the paper was distributed to several Senate offices for the purpose of informing them of these facts about King, facts in which the national news media showed no interest. It was not originally my intention that the paper be read on the floor of the Senate, but the Helms office itself expressed an interest in using it as a speech, and it was read in the Congressional Record on October 3, 1983. During ensuing debate over the King holiday, I acted as a consultant to Sen. Helms and his regular staff.

<...>

Meanwhile, Sen. Helms, with legal assistance from the Conservative Caucus, filed suit in federal court to obtain the release of FBI surveillance tapes on King that had been sealed by court order until the year 2027. Their argument was that senators could not fairly evaluate King's character and beliefs anc ast an informed vote on the holiday measure until they had gained access to this sealed material and had an opportunity to examine it. The Reagan Justice Department opposed this action, and on October 18, U.S. District Judge John Lewis Smith, Jr. refused to release the King files, which remain selaed to this day.

link


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Jesse Helms And Ted Kennedy Had A Gigantic Fight On The Senate Floor
When Helms brought up the fact Bobby Kennedy ordered wiretaps on Dr. King... He clearly, clearly regretted it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. "Reagan administration was indicating that the president would not veto it if it came before him"
"Sen. Helms...filed suit in federal court...The Reagan Justice Department opposed this action.."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. The Money Shot Quote Comes At The End
But there were still obstacles. The country was in a conservative mood. Voters had elected Republican Ronald Reagan as president and he opposed the bill. And U.S. Senator Jesse Helms, a conservative Republican from North Carolina who was facing a tough re-election bid in 1984, was determined to filibuster. And in doing so, he was all too happy to stir up the unproven charge that King was a Communist.

In the end, a simple compromise helped overcome the final opposition. Lawmakers decided to move the holiday from Jan. 15 (King's actual birthday), which was considered too close to Christmas and New Year's, to the third Monday in January.

The bill passed the U.S. House on Aug. 2, 1983 by a 338-90 vote. The Senate approved it 78-22 on Oct. 19. The margins were veto proof, so Reagan had no choice to sign it into law on on November 3, 1983. Afterwards, Reagan was asked whether he thought there was any merit to Helms' Communist charge against King.

"We'll know in about thirty-five years." Reagan answered, referring to the voluminous FBI surveillance tapes on King that a court had ordered sealed until 2027.


http://www.history.com/minisites/history-now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. And Clinton signed DOMA into law. Reflect on that along with this.
Hmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Shame On You For Turning The Martyred Civil Rights Leader Into A Talking Point
In my best Joseph Welch voice "Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. Moderator, please move this thread to FreeRepublic.
Edited on Mon Jan-21-08 12:34 PM by Onlooker
Are we now honoring the man who embraced Apartheid, lied about "welfare queens," launched his campaign in Philadelphia, MS (known only as the place where civil rights workers were murdered), cut spending for school food programs, opposed the Civil Rights Act of '64, etc.?

I understand the political reasons why Obama is saying nice things about Reagan, but rest assured he does not mean it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. The Poster Is Most Likely A Young Man With No Knowledge Of History
Let's not blame him for the failure of our schools...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #26
35. If being wrong was an asset, your screen name would be
GatesSinceBirth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. He unappily signed - we're admiring him for not vetoing it?
he mumbled about his costs but said "Congress seems to be "bent" on it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Even My Reich Wing Congressperson , Bill McCollum Supported The Bill
It was not controversial at all except in Klan circles...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
22. Paul Krugman - Republicans and race
Edited on Mon Jan-21-08 12:52 PM by robbedvoter
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/19/opinion/19krugman.html?_r=4&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
More than 40 years have passed since the Voting Rights Act, which Reagan described in 1980 as “humiliating to the South.”
snip
There are many other examples of Reagan’s tacit race-baiting in the historical record. My colleague Bob Herbert described some of these examples in a recent column. Here’s one he didn’t mention: During the 1976 campaign Reagan often talked about how upset workers must be to see an able-bodied man using food stamps at the grocery store. In the South — but not in the North — the food-stamp user became a “strapping young buck” buying T-bone steaks.

Bookmarking this one for future claims of "Obama supporters never praised reagan on DU" protestations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
34. Uhmm...
wow.
Just wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
36. because this fine rebuttal belongs here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4153868&mesg_id=4153868

Reagan opposed a holiday in honor of MLK and was so uncomfortable around Kings family at the signing ceremony, all he could do was crack jokes.

In his comments about Reagan, it may have been hard to determine what Obama was saying, but it was crystal clear what he was not saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
37. I never thought I would say Reagan being credit in the blogosphere for this
He did this only because he had no choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC