Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BREAKING: South Carolina's most influential newspaper endorses Barack Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:03 PM
Original message
BREAKING: South Carolina's most influential newspaper endorses Barack Obama
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 03:10 PM by flpoljunkie
Obama most likely Democrat to unify America

THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY in South Carolina this year offers voters an unusual choice. Earlier votes have winnowed out the most experienced candidates, leaving a field with fewer accomplishments and differences on policy, but including two candidates who come with the promise to make history just because of who they are.

Looking at the remaining field: Rep. Dennis Kucinich offers a bold plan on health care, but his platform is unlikely to endear him to many in South Carolina. John Edwards has morphed away from the optimist who won South Carolina in 2004. The candidate who stayed mostly above the fray four years ago is angry now, and pushing hard to turn working-class angst into political opportunity. He also has tried to one-up the other top Democrats with the least prudent plan for withdrawing from Iraq.

On positions from Iraq to health care, the policy differences between Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama are minute. Much of the debate between them has involved making these molehills look mountainous or clashing over who-shifted-when.

The one most significant difference between them can be found in how they would approach the presidency - and how the nation might respond.

Hillary Clinton has been a policy wonk most of her life, a trait she has carried into the U.S. Senate. As her debate performances have shown, she has intelligence and a deep understanding of many issues. Her efforts in New York focused first on learning her adopted state’s issues in detail, and pursuing legislation that would not necessarily grab headlines.

But we also have a good idea what a Clinton presidency would look like. The restoration of the Clintons to the White House would trigger a new wave of all-out political warfare. That is not all Bill and Hillary’s fault - but it exists, whomever you blame, and cannot be ignored. Hillary Clinton doesn’t pretend that it won’t happen; she simply vows to persevere, in the hope that her side can win. Indeed, the Clintons’ joint career in public life seems oriented toward securing victory and personal vindication.

Sen. Obama’s campaign is an argument for a more unifying style of leadership. In a time of great partisanship, he is careful to talk about winning over independents and even Republicans. He is harsh on the failures of the current administration - and most of that critique well-deserved. But he doesn’t use his considerable rhetorical gifts to demonize Republicans. He’s not neglecting his core values; he defends his progressive vision with vigorous integrity. But for him, American unity - transcending party - is a core value in itself.

Can such unity be restored, in this poisonous political culture? Not unless that is a nominee’s goal from the outset. It will be a difficult challenge for any candidate; but we wait in the hope that someone really will try. There is no other hope for rescuing our republic from the mire.

Sen. Obama would also have the best chance to repair the damage to America’s global reputation. A leader with his biography - including his roots in Africa and his years spent growing up overseas - could transform the world’s view of America. He would seize that opportunity.

He would close the prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, which has damaged America’s moral standing, and strive to rebuild many diplomatic relationships.

Despite America’s bitter partisan divide, all sides should agree on this: In such an environment, little gets done. Congress has been largely useless under both Republican and Democratic leadership. Setting aside the ideological conflict for conflict’s sake to get anything worthwhile done has fallen severely out of fashion.

And America certainly has things to get done.

From terrorism and climate change to runaway federal entitlement spending, there are big challenges to be faced. Sen. Obama is the only Democrat who plausibly can say that he wants to work with Americans across the political spectrum to address such subjects - and he has the integrity and the skills of persuasion that make him the best-qualified among the remaining Democratic hopefuls to address these challenges.

He would be a groundbreaking nominee. More to the point, he makes a solid case that he is ready to lead the whole country. We see Sen. Barack Obama as the best choice in Saturday’s Democratic primary.

http://www.thestate.com/opinion/story/293153.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. I lived in SC for 2years and damn straight I'd stick a finger in racists' eyes by voting for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Clintons: Oriented toward securing victory & personal vindication.
And the rest of the party - and the world - be damned.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Isn't this another Republican rag?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think this summed the Clintons up perfectly:
"Indeed, the Clintons’ joint career in public life seems oriented toward securing victory and personal vindication."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Circulation: 106,053 Daily
"But we also have a good idea what a Clinton presidency would look like. The restoration of the Clintons to the White House would trigger a new wave of all-out political warfare. That is not all Bill and Hillary’s fault - but it exists, whomever you blame, and cannot be ignored. Hillary Clinton doesn’t pretend that it won’t happen; she simply vows to persevere, in the hope that her side can win. Indeed, the Clintons’ joint career in public life seems oriented toward securing victory and personal vindication."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Funny
So this paper's position is "Vote Obama! Because Clinton will bring out all the bible-thumpers, neocons, and assorted right-wing ascists who will do their best to be mean to her, just as they did in the 90's."

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nailzberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. And we will lose the congress just like in the 90s.
And while we're mired down fighting political battles, no one will be getting health care, and troops won't be leaving Iraq. And while the electorate keeps buying into the Republican notion that Dems can't get anything done, everything shifts back to the right.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. The option isn't to elect a green-thumbed newbie
just because his name isn't Clinton. The option is to not be weak-willed and be willing to fight it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. No.
The point is that they are is polarizing both within their own party and in the general population that they would produce gridlock. Nothing would get done and we most likely wouldn't be able to steam roll the GOP with the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Yes
The endorsement boils down to "vote for Obama cause he ain't Clinton". That is ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nailzberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. I read that paragraph and though, when the hell did I start writing for The State?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. That quote jumped out at me too.
It's so, so true.

What a fantastic endorsement!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. great endorsement.
not that I really think these endorsements matter much. Look at Iowa. k&r anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. Divide and Conquer. That is the strategy that has been so
effectively used against the American people. "There is no other hope for rescuing our republic from the mire." Without uniting the American People, nothing will get done.

"Sen. Obama would also have the best chance to repair the damage to America’s global reputation. A leader with his biography - including his roots in Africa and his years spent growing up overseas - could transform the world’s view of America. He would seize that opportunity." Electing someone that was against the Iraq War from the beginning will also do much to help restore our reputation and standing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well, hell, look at what the Boston Globe did for him in New Hampshire.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Well, hell, look at what the DMR did for her in Iowa- even less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Touche'!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. Lions and Tigers and Bears
Oh My
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:17 PM
Original message
this is good, thanks n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. That editor who wrote that line is a complete jerk and doesn't help their endorsment
Edited on Tue Jan-22-08 03:19 PM by themartyred
by spewing forth this crap in print - "Edwards is angry now, and pushing hard to turn working-class angst into political opportunity."

Opportunist my ass. He is incredible in every debate speaking off the cuff - something Obama can barely accomplish (getting sentences out), at every stump, at every stop he makes - and the reason is, it IS personal. I saw John speak in 04, and he touched on many of the themes then that he does now, but he includes the Bush crimes of the past 4 years in his discussion, and he sees this country teetering on the brink of total collapse (seen the NYSE and world markets today?) and he is very upset about the way things are going - OBAMA WOULD JUST BRING MORE OF THE SAME IN HIS CURRENT FRAME OF MIND.

I hope the people there were watching that debate, if they were, no paper endorsement by someone that obviously backed Obama heavily before the debate is going to change their vote for Edwards or Clinton.

This situation makes me very upset that the entire US doesn't vote for in 8 primaries, one each week, splintered off by pre-arranged populations to even things out, so candidates could see more than just a few small states' opinions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. It's kind of true.
"He also has tried to one-up the other top Democrats with the least prudent plan for withdrawing from Iraq."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerstin Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. The comments about Edwards are not only insulting but dishonest.
The plight of the poor and the growing economic divide have been signature issues for Edwards for over four years now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. Good news. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. kick. eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. This is a nice endorsement
And I'm happy to see they have a strong anti-torture stance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC