Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Remember folks, the winner of the popular vote may not win the most delegates on Feb. 5

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BluegrassDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:17 PM
Original message
Remember folks, the winner of the popular vote may not win the most delegates on Feb. 5
I see a lot of uninformed posters cheering the fact that their candidate is polling ahead in a certain state. Delegates are awarded proportionately and the winner of the popular may not end up with the most delegates on Super Tuesday. For example, a congressional district may have 4 delegates and split them 2 a piece, even though a said candidate won by 10% or more.

So people need to chill about this candidate is ahead in 16 states or whatever. The popular vote means nothing. The delegate counts is what brings the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. white power! nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angie_love Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. flagged
Can this post be flagged somehow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Yes
Just hit that alert button in the lower left corner. I imagine many already have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. If a candidate wins most of the states and is beaten in delegates.
Expect a fiasco of epic proportions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BluegrassDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Rules are the rules
Bush won with the EC votes, even though he lost the popular vote. And the Dems ain't done shit about it except bluff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. New Slogan for the Obama campaign "Like Bush in 2000, we won't actually be the people's choice!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. I Think We Understand That
It's not a perfect correlation but the delegate count usually follows the pop vote as the Electoral College usually follows the pop vote...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Exactly. Look at New Hampshire and Nevada.
Hillary won the popular vote, but Obama got more delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaniqua6392 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. You are exactly right.
Plus the super delegate thing. It is all very complicated and we should not get excited about polls or even if our candidate "wins" a primary. We will not know much until after Super Tuesday. As usual, the popular vote does not mean a thing. Thanks for the reminder to get our heads out of the clouds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dem MS Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaniqua6392 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Welcome to DU Dem MS!!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. So, Clinton could be the Gore of 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. More like the Bush of 2008
Going to court to exclude voters in Nevada, for example....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-22-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. this is a thread celebrating the ability of white people to choose the President...
no matter how few they become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC