|
I watched the debate on CNN on the internet. During one of the breaks, CNN switched to a clip from a speech Bill Clinton was giving at the same time as the debate. In it, Bill Clinton stated something to the effect that you if you hit your banker in the head in the morning, he's not going to give you a loan in the afternoon. He seemed to suggest that we, the people, had better grovel before our financial betters if we want to be able to borrow money from them in the future. Sorry, I could not find a link.
I'm sure some of you, however, also saw that clip.
Is this the same old politics of fear, but this time fear of the financially powerful rather than of the terrorists?
Let's review the history looking backwards from the current situation. We are in an economic crisis. We are told that it is worldwide.
The fact is, however, that it started here when our irresponsible federal reserve lowered interest rates to an unrealistic level and kept them there in order to pacify the public while Bush and his friends plundered our country. To cover up what was really going on, lending institutions created new financial vehicles aimed to keep ignorant Americans in the dark about just how badly they were being robbed. Homeowners (and buyers hoping to become homeowners), squeezed by stagnant wages and rising housing prices took the bait and accepted risky mortgages on their homes in exchange for cash. They quickly spent the cash on consumer goods made overseas. The goods were paid for with money borrowed from overseas, and through this means, America's debt and reliance on foreign banks increased.
Meanwhile, Bush waged a war funded by money he borrowed from international lenders. The war was, to a great extent, an excuse to transfer America's assets directly into the coffers of companies like Halliburton and Blackwater. This all, of course followed the terrible scandals of the early years of the Bush administration including Halliburton caused by the cheating of America's corporate leaders (some of it begun during the Bill Clinton presidency). One common thread links the scandals of the loan scam, Enron, the war and the current situation: theft of the American people by the corporate elite. First they stole our jobs , then they stole our money.
I would correct Clinton's analogy to more accurately reflect our situation as follows: In the morning the international corporate elite hit America over the head. Now what do we do? Grovel?
Hillary's answer is obviously yes. Bill told his twisted version of the facts on her behalf. Obama's answer can also be surmised: "Look, let's all just sit down at the table and talk together. So what if these guys stole us blind, we can resolve in a friendly way. After all, I bring people together and that's all it will take -- a little of my magic and everything will be fine."
One man has a different answer. He has spent his whole life fighting for the victims of corporate greeed. That man is John Edwards. He is the right man for the moment. I'm voting for John Edwards. I will not become violent, but I will not grovel either. I hope you will vote for John Edwards too.
|