Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I get a sick feeling when I see the lack of fight by congressional Democrats.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 03:37 PM
Original message
I get a sick feeling when I see the lack of fight by congressional Democrats.
It literally scares me. We are in serious trouble in this country right now, and the congressional leaders don't seem to have the will to go to battle for us.

Yet we will be told we must elect Democrats, or we will not survive as a country. We were told that before, and we got a majority in 2006.

Now that majority so many of us worked so hard for is letting us down.

Looks like they will go against the vast majority of the Democrats and let the FISA bill through with immunity for telecoms. Harry Reid had the power to choose which bill to bring up for a vote.

He did not choose the House version without retroactive immunity, he chose the one with immunity. He did not have to do that. He could have kept it off the floor if necessary. He is going against the hundreds of thousands who wrote and called.

FISA Debate Lookin' Good for The Telecoms?

The Senate will have two choices when debate begins this Thursday: the Senate intelligence committee's version, which would grant retroactive immunity for the telecoms that participated in the administration's warrantless wiretapping program, or the Senate Judiciary Committee's version, which would not. Although Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) himself opposes retroactive immunity, he struck a deal with the two committee chairmen to hold a vote first on the intelligence committee's version, and then have a vote on Leahy's version as an amendment. Civil liberty advocates say that move slants the debate in favor of a bill with immunity.


Why would Harry do that? It puzzles me.

Also we find that after great expectations of a big fight in the House to get the truth out....that we are let down again.

Who Has Time for Contempt?

Congress is busy with some pretty weighty issues these days: the faltering economy, Iraq and government surveillance just to name a few. And it seems that no one's got the time to respond when the administration tells Congress to stick their subpoenas where the sun don't shine.

Last summer, former White House counsel Harriet Miers didn't even show up in response to a House Judiciary Committee subpoena for testimony related to the U.S. attorney firings. They got an empty chair (see above). The same went for Karl Rove in the Senate Judiciary Committee. Both argued that executive privilege protected them from even appearing to invoke that privilege. The two committees also subpoenaed White House chief of staff Josh Bolten for documents and got nothing in return.

Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) promptly got a contempt citation passed in his committee for both Miers and Bolten in late July, shortly before the summer recess. But it's not official until passed by the full House. When Congress returned, though, nothing happened. Then a vote was supposedly imminent in November -- Conyers even issued a final warning to the White House. But then the vote didn't come (Iraq and FISA got in the way, top Dems said).


Yes things got in the way, you know.

Now they are saying:

“Right now, we’re focused on working in a bipartisan fashion on stimulus,” said House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.), indicating that the contempt vote is not expected for weeks, depending on how quickly the stimulus package moves....


When our Democratic congress is fearful in the face of a battle...then I get just plain scared. I want to yell at them to stop using the word unity...just stop it.

You do not compromise with extremists. They will chew you up and spit you out.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm with you on this
this people are not fighting and doing what should be done. WHY NOT???????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Exactly. "Why" is the important word.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Blackmail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. It's a thought in this day and time with no rules and so much eavesdropping.
It's definitely a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Why Else Would it Be SOOOO Important To Prevent Even the FISA Court from Having Any Oversight?
I believe that this is the "other" secret program that was alluded to in the Ashcroft hospital bed discussions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. They are just trying to keep FISA from being used against them in the election.
The corporations will be pissed at the Democrats and Republicans will say that they were tougher on terrorism. They are wrong, of course. The Democrats are stuck in poor strategy and groupthink.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. Complicity!
This is why the DLC is dangerous. For all their claims of supposedly wanting to help Democrats, they employ people like Marshall Wittman who specifically try to undermine the Democratic Party, even if it means he has to publicly defecate out the most rank and easily-debunkable lies. They reguarly give credence to the right wing's agenda and its worst, most unsupportable lies. They are the real force that tries to make sure this country is a one party state and that Democrats never really challenge the Republicans in a serious way. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sirota/why-the-dlc-is-so-dangero_b_13640.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Groupthink and whipped dog mentality are simpler and more likely
There may be a few being blackmailed, but I would be willing to bet there is a simpler and less sinister explanation. There needs to be a House cleaning, and don't forget to clean the Senate. Don't let that blackmail argument take over your thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. It's because we don't have enough progressive Dems that we are in this position.
If this were not an election year, I can not imagine either Hillary or Obama objecting to the FISA bill. Both of them are just way too conservative for my taste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. I am utterly disgusted by what I see from them.
A complete lack of leadership. Zero political courage. A willingness to turn a blind eye to criminal activity that has hurt America and her citizens. And, in too many instances, complicity in those very activities.

All Harry Reid wants is for the Democratic candidate to win the 2008 election. Sadly, he thinks the best way to do that is for the Dems to scream "bipartisan!" as often as possible, ignore all that Bush and Co. has done that is illegal, and keep their heads down until after the election. :eyes:

In doing so, Harry might win the battle, but, in the end, he may lose the war.

My official affiliation with the Democratic Party is hanging by a very slender thread. If a Dem gets into the Presidential office and proceeds to sweep the past 7+ years under the rug, then my scissors come out and a very sad but neccessary pruning will take place. :(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ordinaryaveragegirl Donating Member (853 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. So many problems...
And so few solutions, thus far. Taking impeachment off the table is a big mistake. Pretty lame that Bill could nearly get impeached for basically getting caught with his pants around his ankles, but Chimp can do whatever the hell he wants and get away with it. Where's the justice here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. McJoan at Kos has a blistering post up about Reid's warning his own Democrats.
This is just amazing to me. It really is.

FISA: Hold your horses

Harry Reid yesterday warned about a filibuster...

We have to finish FISA this week. Everyone should be aware of that point. We have to finish it this week. I know there are important trips people want to take. We have the very important economic conference in Davos that Democrats and Republicans alike would like to go to.

I say, unless we finish the bill Thursday -- and we will not be able to get to it until tomorrow night-- unless we finish the bill on Thursday, then we are going to have to continue working this week until we finish this bill. We have to finish this bill. It is not fair to the House to jam them so that they have 1 day to act on this legislation.

If we finish it this week, I have spoken to the Speaker today and they will work to complete this matter next week. It would be to everyone's advantage if we had more time to do this.

I respect what the Republican leader has said, but everyone here should understand all weekend activities have to be put on hold until we finish this bill. Now, it is possible we could finish it fairly quickly. We are going to work from the Intelligence bill, and if amendments are offered that people don't like, I would suggest they move to table those amendments. Because if people think they are going to talk this to death, we are going to be in here all night. This is not something we are going to have a silent filibuster on. If someone wants to filibuster this bill, they are going to do it in the openness of the Senate.


He is warning Dodd and Feingold actually.

What in the world is going on with Harry Reid?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stravu9 Donating Member (945 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. Think there's anyway...
we could slip them some testosterone or something?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. It would be like slipping sunlight, or garlic, to a vampire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. We have to face it. As long as Reid and Pelosi are running
things, the Democrats will be Pussy's.

Reid and Pelosi both act more like republicans than anything else. Both need to be fired.

Kucinich in for Pelosi

Dodd in for Reid.

The Dems will start to show some balls THEN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. Pelosi et. al. need to go
The second she said impeachment was "off the table" I knew there was trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
7 of 11 Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I though to myself then why the hell
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 08:33 PM by 7 of 11
Did we go through all that to get the Democrats in office? What was the point or did you just want us to waste our time? We wanted Change and you left us with: Bush lite, Now with 60% less bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joey Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. Why have the Dems caved in?
I don't get it and it really pisses me off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. Why would Harry do that? Paraphrasing a statement by Senator Harkin...
When things don't make sense or seem complicated, all you have to do is follow the money and things become remarkably clear.

(Something like that.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Irishonly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
17. I don't get it
I had such high hopes a year ago although I was not happy about the impeachment is off of the table crap. IMHO, it's an assault on the constitution not have have brought charges against Bush and Cheney. Our constitution has been under attack ever since the SCOTUS interfered in the election.

Silly me. I thought a child's health program would be passed and some of our rights would be restored. Nope. I was expecting the rethugiscum's obstructionism would be exploited. Nope. The leadership just walked around dazed and confused. Not one of them said anything about the loyalty oaths rethugiscums signed.

Reaching across the aisle has failed miserably. Bipartisanship is nonexistent. It seems as if their fear of being called weak on terror rules every action. I sincerely hope leadership positions change with the next congress and someone with more spine than Pelosi and Reid will be elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. This is a major concern for me as well, I applaud those who try
and speak out, but they are being silenced quickly.

Kucinich touched on this in his recent interview.

http://www.alternet.org/story/74268/

"Hedges: Have we evolved into a corporate state?

Kucinich: I Look at it as the political equivalent of genetic engineering. That we've taken the gene of corporate America and shot it into both political parties. So they both now are growing with that essence within. So what does that mean? It means oil runs our politics. Corrupt Wall Street interests run our politics. Insurance companies run our politics. Arms manufacturers run our politics. And the public interest is being strangled. Fulfilling the practical aspirations of people should be our mission...

NAFTA, GAT, the WTO, China Trade, and every other trade agreement that's passed in Congress has been passed with the help of either the leadership of or with the help of the Democratic Party, knowing that each and every one of those agreements was devoid of protections for workers, knowing that if you don't have workers' rights put into a trade agreement then workers here in the United States are going to see their own bargaining position undermined because corporations can move jobs out of the country to places where workers don't have any rights. They don't have the right to organize, the right to collective bargaining, the right to strike. So what I see is that the Democratic Party abandoned working people, and paradoxically they're the ones who hoist the flag of workers every two and four years only to engender excitement, and then to turn around and abandon their constituency. This is now on the level of a practiced ritual..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
potone Donating Member (359 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
21. I don't get this, either.
Why are they so concerned about passing this terrible legislation? Why did they vote down a bill that would have given the FISA court oversight over the administration's spying? What is wrong with these people? Don't they understand why we elected them? Does anybody here understand this? I'm scared at how easily the Democrats are willing to give away our constitutional rights without a fight, a fuss, or even a whimper. :banghead: :scared: :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
navarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
22. ugh. complicity, cowardice, laziness, stupidity
which is worse?

perhaps a combination of all 4?

are they ALL on the payroll? or are they all scared for their lives?

Good God, I hope the Repiglicans are messed up enough to lose to this bunch.

I hope Chris Dodd keeps his nerve....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diane in sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
23. Makes me think they are bought, blackmailed or threatened. Neocons and similar criminals,
corporate and otherwise are pretty indifferent about killing people to further their causes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
24. And then we have to see those pics of...
the Dem leaders today with smarmy looks on their faces sitting around a table with Bush. It's just sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
25. No kidding. MAN, I know how you feel. Sick. Heartsick.
They're not going to fight for me. They don't really want to represent me. They sure want my campaign donations, but they don't want to listen to me. And they don't want to think REALLY longterm - like how will we function when we've left, ON THE BOOKS, INTACT, UNCHALLENGED, UNOPPOSED, and UNCHECKED, this dictatorial president shit with all the high crimes and misdemeanors and lies about why we have to go to war, and torture and illegal spying and wire-tapping, and wholesale reckless piracy on parade. They somehow don't think it's worth it to pursue that.

So I just shake my head. AND I do not donate anymore. I don't give ANY money to ANYBODY who's not for IMPEACHMENT. NONE. House OR Senate (because even though the House IMPEACHES, everybody (AND THEIR STAFFERS) hangs out together and runs into each other in the Capitol Hill cafeterias and elevators and parking lots and airport terminals and Georgetown cocktail parties and so forth. And they ALL talk, and they ALL gossip and they ALL compare notes, so I think it's fair game to bring it up with ANY of them.

And they aren't moving on IMPEACHMENT - which is Priority ONE, I think. The signal it sends to history and to future presidents (and would-be unitary executive dictators and kings - if we let bush/cheney get away with it, and if we let their hundreds, if not thousands, of high crimes and misdemeanors stand without ANY action taken - is one I don't even want to contemplate.

And I still can't believe they're so eager to let this go. WTF????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
27. My frustration is indescribable - I am wide eyed at their lack of action
(I hope my picture posting will work - crossing my fingers now LOL)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC