Latina leaders in San Francisco react to Clinton's lies and smears re: Obama and women's rights.

Another very powerful video...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RhL7jTy-cM&NR=1

When did Hillary accuse Obama of not being pro-choice. Never.

Oh I get it - the woman said there is a "whisper campaign". Paranoid? Self important much...? Guess she just wanted to get on the tv.

Honestly, this is just juvenile coming from the Obama campaign.

Where they said he has not taken a position on a woman's right to choose, but Hillary Clinton has.
The mailer had the intended effect, making Obama look squishy on a woman's right.
It said "A woman's right to choose demands a leader who will stand up and protect it.
Hillary Clinton has a record of fighting far-right Republicans in order to defend abortion rights, while Sen. Obama has been unwilling to take a stand on choice."

It's complete crap, but that doesn't really matter, now does it?
Since it went out the day before voting he was unable to counteract it with the facts.
But it did have the unintended consequence of ticking off some members of NOW,NARAL and other Pro-Choice groups for the blatant dishonesty Clinton was resorting to in order to win.
And no, this wasn't some whisper campaign. It was a Clinton mailer sent to NH voters who had checked "Abortion Rights" as an issue of interest on their voter contact card.

http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/tapped_archive?month=01&year=2008&base_name=all_out_war_over_choice_in_new

http://www.newsweek.com/id/91755/output/print

http://www.taylormarsh.com/archives_view.php?id=26778

An apology is in order.

And, Planned Parenthood in Chicago is trying to give Obama cover.

NOW or Chicago Planned Parenthood???

I pick NOW.

Her mailer was accurate. EOS

C'mon, it's the decent thing to do.

Explain why you won't at least admit that you were wrong about the existence of the quotes.

I just asked for them. I wanted to read the source documents. I wanted to see if Hillary actually accused Obama of not being pro-choice. She did not - which is good because he isn't.

You, for some reason as I now understand, assigned a motive to my request for the source. That is your problem - not mine.

Whatever gets your rocks off.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8U00P7O0&show_article=1

Not that it matters.
They never actually address the shenanigans, in fact I think they are downright proud of how low they take the campaign. It's almost a badge of honor for them to be more sleazy than republicans.

It's going to be a long campaign.

I'm convinced she's done more for Womens Rights in a day than....
oh, never mind, just hand in your blue book.
:dunce: D+

My vibrator smudged it.

along with her announcing that she is changing from Clinton to OBama

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVuMYKs8iJs&eurl=http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/hqblog

Hillary sent out a mailer in NH accusing Obama of not being pro-choice.

Last week, several of the women who signed the letter, including House Speaker Terie Norelli, admitted that the letter was false and misleading and issued a public apology to Obama supporters in New Hampshire.

who had a conscience ..And just what our Country needed for a nice change!! WooHOOO! Thank you!

They tried to this because Obama voted present on some Planned Parenthood bills.

The only problem is that this was part of a coordinated strategy with Planned Parenthood.
They have come to Obama's defense on this issue.

"It should never have gotten to the point where anyone thought Obama was not pro-choice," said (former Sen. Katie) Wheeler, a founder of the New Hampshire chapter of NARAL Pro-Choice America. "I don't think the Clinton campaign should have done that. It was divisive and unnecessary...I think it was a mistake and I've spoken to the national and told them it caused problems in New Hampshire, and am hoping they won't do it again."

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/01/18/trying_to_heal_a_rift_in_new_h_1.html

Clinton made these claims.

Look for the video (in video section) of the president of NOW who used to be a supporter of Clinton until she made these smears.

making any such statement.

1. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=4174326

-and-

2. http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/01/18/trying_to_heal_a_rift_in_new_h_1.html


Summary: Women's groups are none to happy with Hillary

is not exactly what I went looking for. I was looking for the actual President of NOW.

Your women's groups = a handful in N.H. First they took a stand and then they wanted to smooth over ruffled feathers by un-doing their stand - that is how politics works. Jeez.

and view in a little bit. Thanks, calteacher.

I always thought the Clintons were smart politicians, but they are taking this off-tilt and people are noticing.