Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

8 things you need to know about Obama and Rezko

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 03:49 PM
Original message
8 things you need to know about Obama and Rezko

8 things you need to know about Obama and Rezko

Tale in national spotlight, thanks to Clinton

January 24, 2008

All of a sudden, seems as if everybody's talking about Barack Obama and Tony Rezko. Even Jay Leno.

Rezko already was a big story in Chicago, accused of influence-peddling in the Blagojevich administration and set to face trial Feb. 25.

But Monday, he became national news -- and an issue in the presidential race. That's when Hillary Clinton blasted Obama for having represented "your contributor, Rezko, in his slum landlord business in inner-city Chicago."

Having a hard time keeping track of the facts? Here are eight things to know:

1. They met in 1990. Obama was a student at Harvard Law School and got an unsolicited job offer from Rezko, then a low-income housing developer in Chicago. Obama turned it down.

2. Obama took a job in 1993 with a small Chicago law firm, Davis Miner Barnhill, that represents developers -- primarily not-for-profit groups -- building low-income housing with government funds.

3. One of the firm's not-for-profit clients -- the Woodlawn Preservation and Investment Corp., co-founded by Obama's then-boss Allison Davis -- was partners with Rezko's company in a 1995 deal to convert an abandoned nursing home at 61st and Drexel into low-income apartments. Altogether, Obama spent 32 hours on the project, according to the firm. Only five hours of that came after Rezko and WPIC became partners, the firm says. The rest of the future senator's time was helping WPIC strike the deal with Rezko. Rezko's company, Rezmar Corp., also partnered with the firm's clients in four later deals -- none of which involved Obama, according to the firm. In each deal, Rezmar "made the decisions for the joint venture," says William Miceli, an attorney with the firm.

4. In 1995, Obama began campaigning for a seat in the Illinois Senate. Among his earliest supporters: Rezko. Two Rezko companies donated a total of $2,000. Obama was elected in 1996 -- representing a district that included 11 of Rezko's 30 low-income housing projects.

5. Rezko's low-income housing empire began crumbling in 2001, when his company stopped making mortgage payments on the old nursing home that had been converted into apartments. The state foreclosed on the building -- which was in Obama's Illinois Senate district.

6. In 2003, Obama announced he was running for the U.S. Senate, and Rezko -- a member of his campaign finance committee -- held a lavish fund-raiser June 27, 2003, at his Wilmette mansion.

7. A few months after Obama became a U.S. senator, he and Rezko's wife, Rita, bought adjacent pieces of property from a doctor in Chicago's Kenwood neighborhood -- a deal that has dogged Obama the last two years. The doctor sold the mansion to Obama for $1.65 million -- $300,000 below the asking price. Rezko's wife paid full price -- $625,000 -- for the adjacent vacant lot. The deals closed in June 2005. Six months later, Obama paid Rezko's wife $104,500 for a strip of her land, so he could have a bigger yard. At the time, it had been widely reported that Tony Rezko was under federal investigation. Questioned later about the timing of the Rezko deal, Obama called it "boneheaded" because people might think the Rezkos had done him a favor.

8. Eight months later -- in October 2006 -- Rezko was indicted on charges he solicited kickbacks from companies seeking state pension business under his friend Gov. Blagojevich. Federal prosecutors maintain that $10,000 from the alleged kickback scheme was donated to Obama's run for the U.S. Senate. Obama has given the money to charity.

Tim Novak

link


Chicago Tribune, Factcheck.Org, Washington Post: Obama Never Represented Tony Rezko

Obama comes clean, but Hillary's sleaze machine thrives



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm not only recommending this, I'm bookmarking it!
Thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. How does that and "five hours of legal work" reconcile?
At the debate, Obama indicated that he did five hours of legal work for the guy.

Doesn't this timeline make that statement about his relationship look a bit...understated?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I recall that, now I see this:"Chicago Tribune, Factcheck.Org, Washington Post: Obama Never Repre-

sented Tony Rezko"


Chicago Tribune, Factcheck.Org, Washington Post:Obama Never Represented Tony Rezk
Chicago Tribune, Factcheck.Org, Washington Post:
Chicago Tribune, Factcheck.Org, Washington Post: Obama Never Represented Tony Rezko
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. There is a difference between "represented" and "did work for", of course.
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 04:02 PM by TwilightZone
In some firms, "represented" could mean just the lead attorney, even if other attorneys or staff do work on a project. They were represented in court by Joe Blow, Esq., but other people worked on the case.

So, technically, "Obama never represented Rezco" could be an accurate statement.

It's a bit of a semantic game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. you are right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. He sets up a straw man to knock it down.
The issue isn't legitimate legal work for a developer. The issue is a cozy, friendly relationship spanning Obama's entire political career with a person who was in the business of doing favors to get favors.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. That's exactly my point.
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 04:17 PM by TwilightZone
Obama's answer re: Rezko in the debate was "I did five hours of legal work for the guy" and then he changed the subject.

Not only does the OP not explain away the apparent misrepresentation, it enforces it.

It's like saying that Hillary Clinton once had lunch with Ted Kennedy and that was the extent of their political relationship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obama muddled the issue during the debate--



But Monday, he became national news --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
31. I called it lying by omission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awaysidetraveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. I have a few more details, which may explain Leno's NBC take on Rezko
Here's a few more details on Rezko. It's no surprise NBC would be after Obama, given the fact that they're owned
by General Electric (GECC)

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/awaysidetraveler/16

It's just a GOP scam to sway the elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thank you.
Two Chicago power players who had repeated, occassional, passing contact in a much bigger picture. There's no indication that they were close friends, that they had extensive contacts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Kicked For The Sake of Clearing the Muddied Waters
I'm waiting for something similar on Norman Hsu, but I haven't heard back from the Clinton campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. Two things you need to know about Jeffrey Epstein


The Fantasist
Accused of paying underage girls for sex, superrich money manager Jeffrey Epstein is finding that living in a dream world is dangerous—even if you can pay for it.

(just the headlines copied)

http://nymag.com/news/features/41826/

-snip-

In any case, Epstein also recognized Clinton's asset value, taking the ex-prez for rides on his jet (like Burkle did and does) and organizing a dinner in Clinton's honor at Epstein's East Side townhouse. Burkle probably didn't appreciate all these overtures, even if Clinton maintained there was plenty Bill to go around.

-snip-

http://gawker.com/news/ron-burkle/ron-burkle-vs-jeffrey-epstein-probable-cause-217755.php


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Which has NOTHING to do with Rezko, does it?
Unless your argument is LOOK! EVERYBODY DOES IT! OBAMA'S JUST LIKE THE CLINTONS!

I thought you were all trying to say Obama is different. I'm the one saying he's a garden variety politician who does favors for people who do favors for him. If he's no different from the Clintons, then I do prefer Hillary, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. So you're saying you're only attacking Obama because you support Clinton
and you don't really care about wrongdoing by politicians?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Am I 12?
Don't pull that crap on me. I'm from New York.

Obama has managed to remain unindicted. I assume that's good enough for everybody? He sold the influence of his office for $300,000. What bothers me most is how easy the dirty deal was to spot.

Would I be bothering about this sleazy Illinois Senator if he weren't running for president? Unlikely. He's hardly the only one. Ted Stevens has decades of corruption on him.

Politicians make ugly deals all the time to get things done for the area they represent. That's normal. That's democracy. This deal with Rezko was only of benefit to Obama and his family. He got help with the house and the chance to buy only the small portion of the adjoining lot he actually wanted in exchange for a Favor To Be Named Later.

Is that disqualifying? Doubt it. But don't you dare try to sell this same old same old as something new and different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Apparently.
You debate like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. Why don't you try defending the Clinton relationship with Epstein?
Is it because you can't, and you'd like to divert attention by endlessly attacking Obama?

Because it sure seems like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. "Full price" was $382,000 over market value of the land.
Paid on the same day to the same person that Obama paid $300,000 less than asking price for the house.

How many developers do you know who pay that much MORE than land is worth?

And if they barely knew each other, why the convenient and helpful real estate deal? The factcheck is beyond disingenuous. Obama never "represented" Tony Rezko. How could he? He represents Illinois. He represented his district in the Illinois state senate. Ted Stevens never "represented" the company that paid for his home improvements, either.

Obama could have bought a cheaper house. He was free to buy one he could afford. Instead, he indebted himself to a major Illinois "fixer." Even if you decide that the $300,000 less that Obama paid for his house was NOT included in the "full price" that Mrs. Rezko paid for the adjoining lot, the Rezkos were still doing Obama a favor in buying it and then selling him back only the portion he wanted. If someone did that for you, would you consider it a small favor, or a big one? I'm going with BIG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
32. That money that needs to go to charity! If we tried some
thing like that we'd be in jail. Sorry but that is back door stealing! Just the kind of person I want for president.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. But, but, but
Hillary said this....and Hillary said that.

Facts be dammed.

Bill praises Rove, then uses his tactics. should we be surprised at all ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
16. Facts? The Clintons don't need no stinkin' facts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. Thanks for doing the industrial strength work
on this ProSense!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DianaForRussFeingold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
20. K&R time to shatter the myth!
He brings up the Iraq war when we have absolutely no proof he would have voted NO on the Iraq War Resolution. That's safe for him to say! -- But let's take a closer look at his background--

He's a protege of Liebermans and it wouldn't surprise me if he picks him for vice president in order to get some Reagan(GOP) votes...

Obama did have a chance to vote NO to war with Iran-- with the Kyl-Lieberman Amendment...
Obama and McCain played it politically safe
and didn't show up!

I don't trust him because I think he's another pushover for the Republican party, drug and insurance companies...
I wondered why corporate media loves him...

"As the Illinois senator prepared to join the presidential fray , he threw his weight behind the union-backed campaign against Wal-Mart. He declared that there was a "moral responsibility to stand up and fight" the company and "force them to examine their own corporate values.

According to the couple's tax returns, Mrs Obama earned $51,200 (£25,700) for her work as a non-executive director on Treehouse's board last year, on top of the $271,618 salary she was paid as a vice-president of the University of Chicago Hospitals.
She also received 7,500 Treehouse stock options, worth a further $72,375, as she did the previous year, when she banked a $45,000 salary from the company.

The apparent contradiction between Sen Obama's political calculation to join the Wal-Mart-bashing lobby, and his wife's profitable role with a company that makes money from Wal-Mart" Sunday Telegraph has learnt." http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/05/13/wobama13.xml

--"Chicago University Hospital Regularly turns away patients with no health insurance and made numerous patient dumping settlements.
She provides a happy friendly famous face for denial of care and showing the indigent the door."

-- "This story is a big eye opener about Obama's philosophical commitment to universal healthcare.
His wife is earning $300,000 from a hospital administration job that essentially amounts to PR work--Chicago University Hospital Regularly turns away patients with no health insurance and made numerous patient dumping settlements. "

"She provides a happy friendly famous face for denial of care and showing the indigent the door."

---"Another story in the Tribune highlights that her signature innovation as "Community Outreach" director/VP was to get unpaid volunteers to go through the Emergency ward to "refer" unisured and non emergency patients to other clinics.
Her role at the UCH seems to be a polite way to have folks removed from the waiting rooms.
It's kind of myth shattering to see she did this sort of work..." http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/news_opinion_letters/2006/10/hospital_positi.html


--" Martin Luther King III to John Edwards: I challenge all candidates to follow your lead"
'…I appreciate that on the major issues of health care, the environment, and the economy, you have framed the issues for what they are - a struggle for justice. And, you have almost single-handedly made poverty an issue in this election." http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4147131
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
21. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magatte Donating Member (323 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #21
37. k&r nt
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
23. Excellent analysis. Some people can't deal with the fact that Obama told the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
25. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
26. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
27. As clean as Barack likely is in his Rezko dealings
Edited on Thu Jan-24-08 09:24 PM by mzmolly
if this becomes national scuttlebut, it's not going to be good.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antoin_Rezkos done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
28. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
29. K&R...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-24-08 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
30. Thanks for highlighting this.... it is worse than I had thought.
It is clear that Obama got a sweetheart deal on his mansion & that Rezko subsidized it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
33. A fine job as always
Thanks for putting it all together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
34. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
35. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magatte Donating Member (323 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
36. Great diary! let the facts actually speak fro themselves
k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC