Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Obama hasn't told us.....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:22 AM
Original message
What Obama hasn't told us.....
How he plans to beat the Republican nominee, how he plans to fight for the democratic agenda. He hasn't done either in 3 yrs in the senate, and is basically mum on the entire subject. All I hear is how he wants to "work with republicans" and how much he admires them.

In the meantime, I hear both Edwards and Clinton telling us how they are going to fight and win against the republican nominee. Have you ever heard a republican base a whole campaign on vowing to work with democrats? Ever heard a republican candidate say how great they thought a democratic president was? No, and you never will. Wake up, people. Obama lives in la la land, but you don't have to live there with him.


Obama praising Reagan, dissing Democrats:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaoYD7iZG9w&feature=related
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BarackBucks Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, first he isn't going to vote for wars of aggression like Clinton did
I'm sure he has many other plans to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. He's got to win first
And from all indications, he isn't up to the job of beating any Republican nominee. He's too busy trying to hold hands with them and simutaneously getting his butt kicked while singing kumbaya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magatte Donating Member (323 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
72. This is how he will fight: ....He explains it quite clearly
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XLyQNJsCv0

You use transparency at every level of government and use public pressure to shame opponents to vote for what their constituencies want. (see reference to independents and republicans OUTSIDE of Washington)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Sure would be nice to hear those plans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BarackBucks Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Are you against the war or not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. The war has nothing to do with this....
He has not said a single word about how he is going to beat the republican nominee, and he shows absolutely no indication that he understands what a fight he would be in for. All we hear from him is that he is going to work with republicans. Sounds like Joe Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BarackBucks Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Tell that to the loved ones of the 4,000 dead
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 01:39 AM by BarackBucks
That General Hillary and monkeyboy sent to their deaths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #9
36. And he would have done the same had he had to vote
.... he has voted for every single war funding bill since he took office. Please.... what a joke to say you are against a war when you consistently vote to fund it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BarackBucks Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #36
46. That is a lie!
You have no right to say that! Completelty over the line. Retract or do not post to me again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #46
51. You're right -- he probably would have voted present
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #51
55. No....he's making plans
to bomb pakistan.....oops.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
25. What war?
You mean the police effort in Iraq? The 'war' ended on May 2nd, 2003, remember. Mission accomplished and all that...besides, Obama's not against 'war'. Just "dumb ones".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
64. War is not my only concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. Yeah, he'll just not vote.
Or change his vote and say oops! I hit the wrong button!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
37. No, he'll just not vote or vote to continue funding them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. Integrity and a better plan for America.
:shrug:

Bill Clinton on his BFF, Karl Rove
"Hey, you did a marvelous job, it was just marvelous what you did," Clinton told Rove, according to the book "The Way to Win: Taking the White House in 2008," by John F. Harris and Mark Halperin. "I want to get you down to the library. I want to talk politics with you. You just did an incredible job, and I'd like to really get together with you and I think we could have a great conversation."


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/14/AR2007081401722.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. What plan? That is what the OP is asking for
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Have you watched the debates? Do you watch the news?
If so I find it hard to believe that you haven't heard of Barack positions or how he wants to, "form a working Democratic majority" by attracting independents and Republicans to push forth the Democratic agenda.

It's called "coattails".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. IOW, he's the kumbaya candidate
He is the most horribly naive candidate I have ever seen run for president in my life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
59. no....it's called
fairytale.......................and it's causing division in the dem party not unity...........unless you count unifying the rethugs. And just because he got the indie vote in Iowa, doesn't translate into getting the indie vote nationally. We will have to wait and see......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #8
71. He has NEVER told us how he is going to do what no Dem elected for the first time since FDR has done
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Yeah, cuz Joe Voter gives a crap about that....
Name me a single president that ever got elected on that platform. Just one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Kennedy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Wrong -- JFK did not run on that at all
You think JFK ran on working with republicans? You must be all of 30 yrs old if you believe that myth. He kicked republican ass is what he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. I said "Integrity and a better plan for America".
Please don't put words into my mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
27. About Mark Halperin ...
First --
ABC News political director Mark Halperin has embarked on the most shameless self-publicity campaign I've ever seen to sell his co-authored love letter to Karl Rove titled The Way to Win.

(From http://mediamatters.org/altercation/200610260009">Altercation (Eric Alterman) -- Mark Halperin and ABC News: How the refs are worked)


Then we have this:

http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?contentid=254151&kaid=127&subid=173">Clinton Politics vs. Bush Politics at DLC.org

So, you're citing the DLC and a Rove fan as definitive sources on Bill Clinton. (Note: Hillary Clinton is running for president.)

Hmmmm.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
11. See this is typical Clinton speak, talking about how everything has to be a "fight".
It doesn't have to be that way if your candidate is not DIVISIVE.

If Obama is able to attract both independents and Republicans, his agenda becomes pretty much a "get on-board or go home come next election" situation for pre-existing Republican Reps and Senators.

It's not that hard to understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. People that think republicans are going to vote for a black
democrat are seriously living on another planet. I think I get it now. Obama supporters are as naive as their candidate.

You know what that message sends to voters? He doesn't have a clue. He doesn't know how to fight for Joe Voter because he doesn't even know how to fight for himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. What a patriot you are.
Why don't you edit that racist shit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. I'm a racist because I recognize that republicans....
aren't going to vote for a black democrat? Well here's another one, they wouldn't vote for a gay or lesbian either, and I AM a lesbian. Does that mean I'm a bigot too? I think it means I'm a realist.

So seriously, he has no plans to fight the republican nominee -- he's just going to convince people to set aside their prejudice and sing kumbaya with him, and all the rethugs are going to join right in.

Like I said, la la land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #18
61. You really cheapen that word
by throwing it around lightly. We're fricking nameless, faceless people on a message board, we don't know each other, calling names shut's down the discussion, is that what you are trying to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #18
62. You really cheapen that word
by throwing it around lightly. We're fricking nameless, faceless people on a message board, we don't know each other, calling names shut's down the discussion, is that what you are trying to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CRH Donating Member (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
73. It is not racist to say there is a lot of closet racism in the US, ...
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 12:05 PM by CRH
some who have watched the society over the last sixty years would say it a fair observation.

Closet racism is not limited to the republicans, or the south, it is alive and fomenting in liberal bastions as well.

I can't tell you how many times I have heard the words nigger and spic in liberal California.

The 'Bradley effect' is real, we do not live in a perfect world, people often disguise their racism, others don't even know their actions are driven by racism. The voting booth shelters view of individual racism. It might be sad, but it is true. To not believe veiled racism exists in the US, and that it is not a significant factor in politics to be over come, is pure naive fantasy.

You might consider these points some, before you use the blinding blanket of mis appropriated patriotism, to smother detractors of your personal views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Considering I know many republicans who will vote for him, I'll call your bullshit
There are repubs who are socially liberal, and not complete whackjobs, like my Uncle. Hes fiscally conservative, but if the right candidates are there, he would vote for Obama because he buys his message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #20
28. Yeah, rethugs will just flock to the polls.....
to vote for him. How come every national poll shows him getting his butt whupped by 7 to 8 pts by every serious rethug then? I hate to break it to you, but the vast majority of rethugs are complete whackjobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. Put up or shut up. You say EVER national poll shows him getting his butt whooped by EVERY serious..
rethug. I call you bullshit

Especially considering the latest NBC poll has him tied with McCain, and HIllary losing by two. So you are already wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #31
38. Does NH ring any bells?
Polls schmolls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #38
41. I'm not saying these polls are right or wrong, but the poster said something that is factually wrong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #20
30. Prove it.
How many you personally know who will vote for him, and back it up, with facts. Otherwise your comment is moot, and probably a fantasy. You said; 'many republicans'. Not just 'your uncle'.

I call your bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #30
39. Here's a few links
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #39
44. Eh....
No, you said "Considering I know many republicans who will vote for him". I said, prove it. People you know. Not just post links. Jeez, I bet this the same kind of slack as performance we can expect from Obama...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #44
48. Sure I know many
Mother and grandmother are both registered pubs who are voting for Obama if hes in the general. In my Class on Congress, we did a survey on the politics of the class and their support for President. of the 80 people in the class, 25 support Obama, which included 5 of the self-identified conservatives. I know people like Andrew Sullivan, a repub who is an Obama supporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #17
47. He certainly has a better chance at swinging them over than Hillary.
Which is interesting, considering that we've been told for years now that it's the DLC route that gets Republicans and independents to vote for us...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #47
53. No he doesn't
He doesn't have a prayer of swinging them over. And pssst, that's crap about the DLC too. ;) We simply are not going to win elections by being republican lite when people have a choice to vote for the real thing -- an actual republican. It's cowardly to be so cynical about your own party that you think you have to appeal to the rethug ideology. It keeps dems away from the polls, and I don't blame them. Why bother when your own effin party won't stand up for you? It's a sad day at DU to see this BS embraced. If it worked, the rethugs would do it. Notice they don't. But we keep doing it over and over again, endlessly hoping that next time it will be different. It won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #53
56. I think he does. Otherwise, I essentially agree.
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 02:39 AM by Dr Fate
Independents and moderate Republicans seem to like him-and I never really viewed Obama or Edwards on the whole as GOP light. I don't see either of them pandering to Republicans like say, Lieberman or Harold Ford did. In Obama's case, a few repubs and a ton of independents seem to like him anyway.

I never really viewed Hillary as GOP lite either- but I have noticed how much the DLC types have gone along with or caved to the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #17
54. They are as likely to vote for a black as they are to vote for a Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #54
58. Dems yes, rethugs - Edwards
But the media doesn't want us to consider Edwards, so we won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkySue Donating Member (647 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
43. Good for you
if you want to cozy up with the Republicans. That "working with the Republicans/Unity" shit is what Reid and Pelosi have been doing. Working great, eh?
Screw the Republicans! They are the reason this country is in such a mess. They are the ones that have been in charge the last 7 glorious years. I say to hell with them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:33 AM
Response to Reply #43
66. Odd....Wes Clark used to say the same thing as Barack is saying.....
That Independents and Republicans would vote for him, and that this would be good thing!


You seemed to like the idea at the time. What happened? :shrug:

We need a candidate for President who can represent us all: everyone who is for freedom and democracy and against the rise of authoritarianism in our nation and the world. The candidate must appeal to Democrats, Republicans, Independents, and everyone else. General Wesley Clark is that candidate. He is a little-d democrat first and foremost: an advocate of democracy.
http://www.kafka.com/politics/2003/12/hanukkah-message-supporting-wes-clark.php

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #66
70. It's getting most peculiar
I begin to wonder where we all were. Did we dream it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
60. That's just it....we do understand it.....we just don't buy it! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
14. Hes told, you're just to into hating him to actually listen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. He's told me and himself a fairy tale....
that republicans are going to vote for a black democrat. The naivety is astounding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Your ignorance is astounding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #21
32. Show us where he said it then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
22. Have you ever heard a republican base a whole campaign on vowing to work with democrats?
have you ever heard the expression: I'M A UNITER NOT A DIVIDER
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
26. He's gonna kick ass, and get voters excited to vote for him.....
just like he's been doing.

Underestimate him at your own peril.

I know that the Clintons did before Iowa. They don't anymore.

He'll force Republicans to listen to our message. They'll want to know why we are so excited....and once they finally hear a Democrat, some will learn to like it, others to love it. They'll realize that it is a brand new dawn, and they'll understand that voting for their own interest is what they should be doing.

You see, that's the advantage of standing out in a crowd, in a great many ways!



INDEPENDENTS AND REPUBLICANS FINALLY GETTING A CHANCE TO UNDERSTAND DEMOCRATS
AND THE FACT THAT IT IS DEMOCRATS WHO WANT THE BEST FOR ALL AMERICANS!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #26
33. You're living in a dream world too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #33
40. Why?

Vote of Confidence
A huge black turnout in November 1992 altered Chicago's electoral landscape—and raised a new political star: a 31-year-old lawyer named Barack Obama.

In the final, climactic buildup to November's general election, with George Bush gaining ground on Bill Clinton in Illinois and the once-unstoppable campaign of senatorial candidate Carol Moseley Braun embroiled in allegations about her mother's Medicare liability, one of the most important local stories managed to go virtually unreported: The number of new voter registrations before the election hit an all-time high. And the majority of those new voters were black. More than 150,000 new African-American voters were added to the city's rolls. In fact, for the first time in Chicago's history-including the heyday of Harold Washington-voter registrations in the 19 predominantly black wards outnumbered those in the city's 19 predominantly white ethnic wards, 676,000 to 526,000.

None of this, of course, was accidental. The most effective minority voter registration drive in memory was the result of careful handiwork by Project Vote!, the local chapter of a not-for-profit national organization.

"It was the most efficient campaign I have seen in my 20 years in politics," says Sam Burrell, alderman of the West Side's 29th Ward and a veteran of many registration drives.

At the head of this effort was a little-known 31-year-old African-American lawyer, community organizer, and writer: Barack Obama.

To understand the full implications of Obama's effort, you first need to understand how voter registration often has worked in Chicago. The Regular Democratic Party spearheaded most drives, doing so using one primary motivator: money. The party would offer bounties to registrars for every new voter they signed up (typically a dollar per registration).

The campaigns did produce new voters. "But bounty systems don't really promote participation," says David Orr, the Cook County clerk, whose office is responsible for voter registration efforts in the Cook County suburbs. "When the money dries up, the voters drop out." Nor did the Democratic Party always vigorously push registration among minorities, Orr says. "It's not that they discouraged it. They just never worked hard to ensure it would happen."
http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/January-1993/Vote-of-Confidence

Read the whole damn article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #40
45. Oh God....
...even if Obama got every black voter in the country, he'd still lose. And, no, I'm not going to read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #40
49. We should elect him president because he ran a successful
voter registration drive? LOL!

You know, this post of yours is ironic, because that's about how I see from Obama supporters. You folks want our party to nominate a guy whose resume is so thin we've got to hear this voter registration story over and over and over again, just so you can have some accomplishment of his to claim. Now let's get serious for a minute... can you think of another presidential candidate EVER that had to tout that kind of thing just so he had something to tout??

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. So you think that voting for the son of a mill worker who ain't done nothing
but talk or the Wife of a former President whose done less than Obama has in her years in the senate?

Why are they so much bette? Why don't you show me.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=4192452&mesg_id=4192830
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #26
34. OMG, can you folks be more naive?
Truly, it's unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #34
42. Kiss my grits then and believe that!
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 02:10 AM by FrenchieCat
Clinton underestimated Barack before Iowa too.

Why do you think that Mr. & Mrs. Clinton are currently so unhinged?
It wasn't supposed to happen, but it did. A Black man won a 99% white state
and came in way ahead of an established last Democratic President and his
Ambitious wife, and another ambitious Candidate who's been camped out in Iowa
since 2003. Figure that as naive, and it may not all end as you plan.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #42
57. I don't think they are unhinged at all
I think they play hardball politics because that is what wins elections. And I think he is completely clueless because he has never really run a contested race for anything. Hence the playing the victim thing that he does. I really wasn't convinced he'd be the very worst choice until he started whining the minute they started beating him. No way can he stand up to the rethug nominee. No way in hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
29. That's a reasonable worry, Mags.
One of many of my worries about Barack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemDogs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
35. Obama, the mirror
At some point we do have to ask the question about who he really is. The magic is nice but already it looks tarnished. If the magic does not get the Dems to the White House, will he be able to do, just the man Obama? I have thought that he had the making of something great even if it was unformed, but I am beginning to doubt even that. One thing for sure: he believes that he is the Magic. That bothers me, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #35
50. Instead of talking out of your ass so much,
maybe you should do a little research.

It ain't magic, it's called natural talent and sound judgment.

Don't you wish your candidate had been smart and prescient enough to come up with political courage and common sense?


Delivered on 26 October 2002 at an anti-war rally

I don’t oppose all wars. And I know that in this crowd today, there is no shortage of patriots, or of patriotism. What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other arm-chair, weekend warriors in this Administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne.

What I am opposed to is the attempt by political hacks like Karl Rove to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the poverty rate, a drop in the median income – to distract us from corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone through the worst month since the Great Depression.

That’s what I’m opposed to. A dumb war. A rash war. A war based not on reason but on passion, not on principle but on politics.

Now let me be clear – I suffer no illusions about Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal man. A ruthless man. A man who butchers his own people to secure his own power. He has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity.

He’s a bad guy. The world, and the Iraqi people, would be better off without him.

But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States, or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history.

I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a US occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaeda.

I am not opposed to all wars. I’m opposed to dumb wars.

So for those of us who seek a more just and secure world for our children, let us send a clear message to the president today. You want a fight, President Bush? Let’s finish the fight with Bin Laden and al-Qaeda, through effective, coordinated intelligence, and a shutting down of the financial networks that support terrorism, and a homeland security program that involves more than color-coded warnings.

You want a fight, President Bush? Let’s fight to make sure that the UN inspectors can do their work, and that we vigorously enforce a non-proliferation treaty, and that former enemies and current allies like Russia safeguard and ultimately eliminate their stores of nuclear material, and that nations like Pakistan and India never use the terrible weapons already in their possession, and that the arms merchants in our own country stop feeding the countless wars that rage across the globe.

You want a fight, President Bush? Let’s fight to make sure our so-called allies in the Middle East, the Saudis and the Egyptians, stop oppressing their own people, and suppressing dissent, and tolerating corruption and inequality, and mismanaging their economies so that their youth grow up without education, without prospects, without hope, the ready recruits of terrorist cells.

You want a fight, President Bush? Let’s fight to wean ourselves off Middle East oil, through an energy policy that doesn’t simply serve the interests of Exxon and Mobil.

Those are the battles that we need to fight. Those are the battles that we willingly join. The battles against ignorance and intolerance. Corruption and greed. Poverty and despair.

The consequences of war are dire, the sacrifices immeasurable. We may have occasion in our lifetime to once again rise up in defense of our freedom, and pay the wages of war. But we ought not – we will not – travel down that hellish path blindly. Nor should we allow those who would march off and pay the ultimate sacrifice, who would prove the full measure of devotion with their blood, to make such an awful sacrifice in vain.
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Barack_Obama's_Iraq_Speech





Obama Says Gitmo Facility Should Close

The Democratic presidential hopeful pledged to work side-by-side with the rest of the world on issues like nuclear proliferation, poverty, economic development in Latin America and the violence in Darfur.

"While we're at it," he said, "we're going to close Guantanamo. And we're going to restore habeas corpus. ... We're going to lead by example _ by not just word but by deed. That's our vision for the future."

Habeas corpus is a tenet of the Constitution that protects people from unlawful imprisonment
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/24/AR2007062401046.html

---------------
Human Rights Should Be Bigger than Politics
Senator Barack Obama delivered this speech on the floor of the US Senate, in reaction to Senate passage of S. 3930, Military Commissions Act of 2006, which approved US torture of detainees and strips Constitutional rights away from detainees.
Senator Obama decries the placement of politics over human rights, and condemns S. 3930. He states, "This is not how a serious Administration would approach the problem of terrorism."
http://usliberals.about.com/od/extraordinaryspeeches/a/ObamaTorture.htm

excerpts from Obama's statement...

In the five years that the President's system of military tribunals has existed, not one terrorist has been tried. Not one has been convicted. And in the end, the Supreme Court of the United found the whole thing unconstitutional, which is why we're here today.

We could have fixed all of this in a way that allows us to detain and interrogate and try suspected terrorists while still protecting the accidentally accused from spending their lives locked away in Guantanamo Bay. Easily. This was not an either-or question.

Instead of allowing this President - or any President - to decide what does and does not constitute torture, we could have left the definition up to our own laws and to the Geneva Conventions, as we would have if we passed the bill that the Armed Services committee originally offered.

Instead of detainees arriving at Guantanamo and facing a Combatant Status Review Tribunal that allows them no real chance to prove their innocence with evidence or a lawyer, we could have developed a real military system of justice that would sort out the suspected terrorists from the accidentally accused.

And instead of not just suspending, but eliminating, the right of habeas corpus - the seven century-old right of individuals to challenge the terms of their own detention, we could have given the accused one chance - one single chance - to ask the government why they are being held and what they are being charged with.
http://usliberals.about.com/od/extraordinaryspeeches/a/ObamaTorture.htm


1. http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9845595-7.html
For one thing, under an Obama presidency, Americans will be able to leave behind the era of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and "wiretaps without warrants," he said. (He was referring to the lingering legal fallout over reports that the National Security Agency scooped up Americans' phone and Internet activities without court orders, ostensibly to monitor terrorist plots, in the years after the September 11 attacks.)

It's hardly a new stance for Obama, who has made similar statements in previous campaign speeches, but mention of the issue in a stump speech, alongside more frequently discussed topics like Iraq and education, may give some clue to his priorities.

In our own Technology Voters' Guide, when asked whether he supports shielding telecommunications and Internet companies from lawsuits accusing them of illegal spying, Obama gave us a one-word response: "No."

Including this:
In 1992, was the Director of Illinois Project VOTE, which registered approximately 150,000 mostly Democratic voters in Chicago's Cook County
Opposes the death penalty and school vouchers
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1511

Obama noted that he sponsored successful death-penalty-reform legislation as a lawmaker in Springfield. That legislation, among other things, required the videotaping of homicide interrogations, and he promised to advocate for similar reforms on a national scale.

He backed federal legislation that would ban citizens from carrying weapons, except for law enforcement. He cited Texas as an example of a place where a law allowing people to carry weapons has "malfunctioned" because hundreds of people granted licenses had prior convictions.

said mandatory sentencing laws should be overturned to give judges more discretion and provide more equitable treatment for minorities.
http://www.icadp.org/page236.html
--------------------
Obama cites role in death penalty reform
Barack Obama can honestly claim to have made a difference on a matter of life and death.

While an Illinois state senator, Obama was key in getting the state's notorious death penalty laws changed, including a requirement that in most cases police interrogations involving capital crimes must be recorded.

The changes enacted in 2003 reformed a system that had sent 13 people to death row, only to have them released because they were later determine to be innocent or had been convicted using improper methods.

"Without Barack's energy, imagination and commitment I do not believe the very substantial and meaningful reforms that became law in Illinois would have taken place," said author Scott Turow, a member of the state commission that recommended many of the changes.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/11/12/obama.death.penalty.ap/





. OBAMA Senate bills sponsored :
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/thomas
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


S.CON.RES.53 : A concurrent resolution expressing the sense of Congress that any effort impose photo identification requirements for voting should be rejected.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 9/20/2005) Cosponsors (23)
Committees: Senate Rules and Administration
Latest Major Action: 9/20/2005 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.697 : A bill to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to improve higher education
, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 4/5/2005) Cosponsors (2)
Committees: Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Latest Major Action: 4/5/2005 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.918 : A bill to provide for Flexible Fuel Vehicle (FFV) refueling capability at new and existing refueling station facilities to promote energy security and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 4/27/2005) Cosponsors (5)
Committees: Senate Finance
Latest Major Action: 4/27/2005 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.969 : A bill to amend the Public Health Service Act with respect to preparation for an influenza pandemic, including an avian influenza pandemic
, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 4/28/2005) Cosponsors (9)
Committees: Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Latest Major Action: 4/28/2005 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.1180 : A bill to amend title 38, United States Code, to reauthorize various programs servicing the needs of homeless veterans for fiscal years 2007 through 2011,
and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 6/7/2005) Cosponsors (6)
Committees: Senate Veterans' Affairs
Latest Major Action: 6/9/2005 Senate committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.1194 : A bill to direct the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to establish guidelines and procedures for tracking, controlling, and accounting for individual spent fuel rods and segments.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 6/8/2005) Cosponsors (None)
Committees: Senate Environment and Public Works
Latest Major Action: 6/8/2005 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.1426 : A bill to amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to reauthorize and extend provisions relating to contaminant prevention detection, and response.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 7/19/2005) Cosponsors (None)
Committees: Senate Environment and Public Works
Latest Major Action: 7/19/2005 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.1630 : A bill to direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish the National Emergency Family Locator System.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 9/7/2005) Cosponsors (9)
Committees: Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Latest Major Action: 9/7/2005 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S1638 : A bill to provide for the establishment of programs and activities to assist in mobilizing an appropriate healthcare workforce in the event of a health emergency or natural disaster.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 9/8/2005) Cosponsors (6)
Committees: Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Latest Major Action: 9/8/2005 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.1685 : A bill to ensure the evacuation of individuals with special needs in times of emergency.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 9/12/2005) Cosponsors (11)
Committees: Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Latest Major Action: 9/12/2005 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.1770 : A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for advance payment of the earned income tax credit and the child tax credit for 2005 in order to provide needed funds to victims of Hurricane Katrina and to stimulate local economies.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 9/26/2005) Cosponsors (5)
Committees: Senate Finance
Latest Major Action: 9/26/2005 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.1920 : A bill to amend the Clean Air Ac t to establish a renewable diesel standard, and for other purposes.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 10/25/2005) Cosponsors (1)
Committees: Senate Environment and Public Works
Latest Major Action: 10/25/2005 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.1975 : A bill to prohibit deceptive practices in Federal elections.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 11/8/2005) Cosponsors (4)
Committees: Senate Rules and Administration
Latest Major Action: 11/8/2005 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.2045 : A bill to provide incentives to the auto industry to accelerate efforts to develop more energy-efficient vehicles to lessen dependence on oil.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 11/17/2005) Cosponsors (1)
Committees: Senate Finance
Latest Major Action: 11/17/2005 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.2047 : A bill to promote healthy communities.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 11/17/2005) Cosponsors (1)
Committees: Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Latest Major Action: 11/17/2005 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.2048 : A bill to direct the Consumer Product Safety Commission to classify certain children's products containing lead to be banned hazardous substances.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 11/17/2005) Cosponsors (3)
Committees: Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation
Latest Major Action: 11/17/2005 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.2125 : A bill to promote relief, security, and democracy in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 12/16/2005) Cosponsors (12)
Committees: Senate Foreign Relations; House International Relations
Latest Major Action: Became Public Law No: 109-456


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.2149 : A bill to authorize resources to provide students with opportunities for summer learning through summer learning grants.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 12/20/2005) Cosponsors (1)
Committees: Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Latest Major Action: 12/20/2005 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.2179 : A bill to require openness in conference committee deliberations and full disclosure of the contents of conference reports and all other legislation.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 1/18/2006) Cosponsors (9)
Committees: Senate Rules and Administration
Latest Major Action: 1/18/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.2201 : A bill to amend title 49, United States Code , to modify the mediation and implementation requirements of section 40122 regarding changes in the Federal Aviation Administration personnel management system, and for other purposes.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 1/26/2006) Cosponsors (38)
Committees: Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation
Latest Major Action: 1/26/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

26. S.2247 : A bill to promote greater use of information technology in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program under chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, to increase efficiency and reduce costs.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 2/6/2006) Cosponsors (None)
Committees: Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Latest Major Action: 3/28/2006 Referred to Senate subcommittee. Status: Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs referred to Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the District of Columbia.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

27. S.2257 : A bill to provide for an enhanced refundable credit for families who resided in the Hurricane Katrina disaster area on August 28, 2005.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 2/8/2006) Cosponsors (3)
Committees: Senate Finance
Latest Major Action: 2/8/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

28. S.2259 : A bill to establish an Office of Public Integrity in the Congress and a Congressional Ethics Enforcement Commission.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 2/8/2006) Cosponsors (2)
Committees: Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Latest Major Action: 2/8/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

29. S.2261 : A bill to provide transparency and integrity in the earmark process.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 2/8/2006) Cosponsors (1)
Committees: Senate Rules and Administration
Latest Major Action: 2/8/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.2280 : A bil l to stop transactions which operate to promote fraud, risk, and under-development, and for other purposes.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 2/14/2006) Cosponsors (2)
Committees: Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
Latest Major Action: 2/14/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.2286 : A bill to amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to eliminate the separate work participation rate for 2-parent families under the temporary assistance for needy families programs.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 2/14/2006) Cosponsors (1)
Committees: Senate Finance
Latest Major Action: 2/14/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

32. S.2319 : A bill to provide for the recovery from Hurricane Katrina, and for other purposes.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 2/16/2006) Cosponsors (None)
Committees: Senate Finance
Latest Major Action: 2/16/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

33. S.2348 : A bill to amend the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to require a licensee to notify the Atomic Energy Commission, and the State and county in which a facility is located, whenever there is an unplanned release of fission products in excess of allowable limits.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 3/1/2006) Cosponsors (4)
Committees: Senate Environment and Public Works
Senate Reports: 109-347
Latest Major Action: 9/25/2006 Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 637.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

34. S.2358 : A bill to amend title 38, United States Code, to establish a Hospital Quality Report Card Initiative to report on health care quality in Veterans Affairs hospitals.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 3/2/2006) Cosponsors (None)
Committees: Senate Veterans' Affairs
Latest Major Action: 3/2/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

35. S.2359 : A bill to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to establish a Hospital Quality Report Card Initiative under the Medicare program to assess and report on health care quality in hospitals.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 3/2/2006) Cosponsors (None)
Committees: Senate Finance
Latest Major Action: 3/2/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

36. S.2441 : A bill to authorize resources for a grant program for local educational agencies to create innovation districts.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 3/16/2006) Cosponsors (None)
Committees: Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Latest Major Action: 3/16/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

37. S.2446 : A bill to promote the national security and stability of the economy of the United States by reducing the dependence of the United States on oil through the use of alternative fuels and new technology, and for other purposes.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 3/16/2006) Cosponsors (2) Committees: Senate Finance
Latest Major Action: 3/16/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

38. S.2484 : A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit the disclosure of tax return information by tax return preparers to third parties.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 3/30/2006) Cosponsors (8)
Committees: Senate Finance
Latest Major Action: 3/30/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.2506 : A bill to require Federal agencies to support health impact assessments and take other actions to improve health and the environmental quality of communities, and for other purposes.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 4/4/2006) Cosponsors (6)
Committees: Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Latest Major Action: 4/4/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.2984 : A bill to require certain profitable oil companies to expend 1 percent of recent quarterly profits to install E-85 fuel pumps in the United States.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 5/23/2006) Cosponsors (None)
Committees: Senate Energy and Natural Resources
Latest Major Action: 5/23/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.3475 : A bill to provide housing assistance for very low-income veterans.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 6/7/2006) Cosponsors (3)
Committees: Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
Latest Major Action: 6/7/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.3554 : A bill to establish an alternative diesel standard,
and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 6/21/2006) Cosponsors (4)
Committees: Senate Environment and Public Works
Latest Major Action: 6/21/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.3627 : A bill to prohibit the Department of Defense and the Department of Energy from selling, distributing, or transferring elemental mercury, to prohibit the export of elemental mercury, and for other purposes.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 6/29/2006) Cosponsors (None)
Committees: Senate Environment and Public Works
Latest Major Action: 6/29/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S.3631 : A bill to amend the Toxic Substances Control Act to phase out the use of mercury in the manufacture of chlorine and caustic soda, and for other purposes.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 7/11/2006) Cosponsors (None)
Committees: Senate Environment and Public Works
Latest Major Action: 7/11/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S.3694 : A bill to increase fuel economy standards for automobiles,
and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 7/19/2006) Cosponsors (10)
Committees: Senate Finance
Latest Major Action: 7/19/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.3757 : A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 950 Missouri Avenue in East St. Louis, Illinois, as the "Katherine Dunham Post Office Building".

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 7/27/2006) Cosponsors (1)
Committees: Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Latest Major Action: 7/27/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Note: For further action, see H.R.5929, which became Public Law 109-333 on 10/12/2006.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S.3822 : A bill to improve access to and appropriate utilization of valid, reliable and accurate molecular genetic tests by all populations thus helping to secure the promise of personalized medicine for all Americans.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 8/3/2006) Cosponsors (None)
Committees: Senate Finance
Latest Major Action: 8/3/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.3969 : A bill to amend the Toxic Substances Control Act to assess and reduce the levels of lead found in child-occupied facilities in the United States,
and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 9/28/2006) Cosponsors (1)
Committees: Senate Environment and Public Works
Latest Major Action: 9/28/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

64. S.3988 : A bill to amend title 10 and 38, United States Code, to improve benefits and services for members of the Armed Forces, veterans of the Global War on Terrorism, and other veterans, to require reports on the effects of the Global War on Terrorism
, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 9/28/2006) Cosponsors (None)
Committees: Senate Veterans' Affairs
Latest Major Action: 9/28/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.4069 : A bill to prohibit deceptive practices in Federal elections.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 11/16/2006) Cosponsors (4)
Committees: Senate Rules and Administration
Latest Major Action: 11/16/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.4102 : A bill to amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prohibit the use of telecommunications devices for the purposes of preventing or obstructing the broadcast or exchange of election-related information.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 12/7/2006) Cosponsors (None) Committees: Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation
Latest Major Action: 12/7/2006 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.AMDT.159 to S.CON.RES.18 To prevent and, if necessary, respond to an international outbreak of the avian flu.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 3/15/2005) Cosponsors (2)
Latest Major Action: 3/17/2005 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 159 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


S.AMDT.390 to H.R.1268 To provide meal and telephone benefits for members of the Armed Forces who are recuperating from injuries incurred on active duty in Operation Iraqi Freedom or Operation Enduring Freedom.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 4/13/2005) Cosponsors (3)
Latest Major Action: 4/14/2005 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 390 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.AMDT.670 to H.R.3 To provide for Flexible Fuel Vehicle (FFV) refueling capability at new and existing refueling station facilities to promote energy security and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 5/11/2005) Cosponsors (9)
Latest Major Action: 5/12/2005 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 670 as modified agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S.AMDT.808 to H.R.6 To establish a program to develop Fischer-Tropsch transportation fuels from Illinois basin coal.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 6/20/2005) Cosponsors (1)
Latest Major Action: 6/23/2005 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 808 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.AMDT.851 to H.R.6 To require the Secretary to establish a Joint Flexible Fuel/Hybrid Vehicle Commercialization Initiative, and for other purposes.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 6/22/2005) Cosponsors (1) Latest Major Action: 6/23/2005 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 851 as modified agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------


S.AMDT.1264 to H.R.3057 To support a United States contribution to the Special Court for Sierra Leone.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 7/18/2005) Cosponsors (3)
Latest Major Action: 7/19/2005 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 1264 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.AMDT.1362 to S.1042 To require a report on the Department of Defense Composite Health Care System II.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 7/21/2005) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 11/8/2005 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 1362 as modified agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


S.AMDT.1453 to S.1042 To ensure the protection of military and civilian personnel in the Department of Defense from an influenza pandemic, including an avian influenza pandemic.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 7/25/2005) Cosponsors (2)
Latest Major Action: 11/8/2005 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 1453 as modified agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


S.AMDT.2301 to H.R.3010 To increase funds to the Thurgood Marshall Legal Educational Opportunity Program and to the Office of Special Education Programs of the Department of Education for the purposes of expanding positive behavioral interventions and supports.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 10/26/2005) Cosponsors (6)
Latest Major Action: 10/27/2005 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 2301 agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.AMDT.2605 to S.2020 Expressing the sense of the Senate that the Federal Emergency Management Agency should immediately address issues relating to no-bid contracting.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 11/17/2005) Cosponsors (5)
Latest Major Action: 11/17/2005 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 2605 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


S.AMDT.2930 to S.2349 To clarify tha t availability of legislation does not include nonbusiness days.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 3/7/2006) Cosponsors (1)
Latest Major Action: 3/29/2006 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 2930 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.AMDT.2965 to S.2349 To ban employment negotiations to become lobbyists by Members of Congress and required recusal for senior congressional staff while in office.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 3/8/2006) Cosponsors (2)
Latest Major Action: 3/29/2006 Amendment SA 2965 ruled out of order by the chair.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.AMDT.2995 to S.2349 To expand the prohibition on lobbying in the year after leaving service to the Senate to include a prohibition on paid coordination activities.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 3/9/2006) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 3/29/2006 Amendment SA 2995 ruled out of order by the chair.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.AMDT.3144 to S.CON.RES.83 To provide a $40 million increase in FY 2007 for the Homeless Veterans Reintegration Program and to improve job services for hard-to-place veterans.

Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 3/16/2006) Cosponsors (2)
Latest Major Action: 3/16/2006 Senate amendment agreed to. Status: Amendment SA 3144 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


OFFICAL SENATOR BARACK OBAMA EXPERIENCE THREAD
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4027627


Obama - Handy guide on the issues
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/zulchzulu

More....
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=3957420



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
63. Good, good points.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandem5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
65. I share your frustrations - I don't understand why the hard questions don't apply to him.
I don't want to *hope* he has a plan for our future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #65
67. Why don't you tell us about Edwards 54 years working on poverty....
and Hillary's 35 years....

that should be interesting!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandem5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:53 AM
Response to Reply #67
68. So what does that mean? Since everybody is guilty of rhetorical nonsense...
let's just vote for the guy with the platform that boils down to the principles of "The Secret"???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:06 AM
Response to Reply #68
69. Do you know what his platforms even are? Do you even know what he's accomplished?
Or are you too much in political love with John "the Hawk" Edwards or Hillary "the Hawk" Clinton to care to have looked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandem5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #69
74. Yes, I've reviewed his positions I've heard what he has had to say...
I apologize for my previous flippant response, but I'm sorry I cannot support his candidacy at this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merkins Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
75. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC