Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If this REZKO matter isn't fully examined now the RePUKE nominee would bring it up every single day

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:28 PM
Original message
If this REZKO matter isn't fully examined now the RePUKE nominee would bring it up every single day
if Obama won the nomination this would be examined. It needs to be done now before it's too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. You're right. We need to fully vet the Clinton campaign. It's obvious that if she's turning up
with dirty money from the guy she was trying to use to bash Obama, things run much, much deeper than anyone can see. Even she can't keep track of all her corrupt donors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. 'cept Rezko never gave her a dime
I used to think you were one of the more reasonable posters here. I was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. MonkeyFunk, listen. You know, as well as I do, that this entire Rezko business is bullshit.
You don't give a damn about it, and neither do I. Neither of us give a damn about Hsu, either. Fundraising is all playing six-degrees-of-Kevin-Bacon with blindfolds. Frankly, the guy Hillary took money from is a guy who--if he had given that money to Obama--would be lumped in with the "Rezko-associated lawyers," since most of that money is about as far removed from the central scandal as this money is.

My point--as it has been through this entire fake-ass "affair"--is that nobody is clean. Each of the three candidates have taken dirty money, and each of the three returned it when they got caught. Obviously nobody knew the money they were taking was dirty; no politician would ever sell their credibility for a measly $50k. And each of the three have, when caught, reacted appropriately.

This entire thing is bullshit left and right, and I'm getting sick of the false sanctimony coming from people sharing your avatar, just as I would be if it were people with my avatar bitching about Hsu or some shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. You're all over this issue
and using childish names like "Goddess of Peace". I expect it from some of the losers here, but was surprised to see you using such terms.

Oh well - you're certainly not the first person to disappoint me here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. You're right. I am all over this issue tonight.
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 11:55 PM by Occam Bandage
Because it's lame as hell. Strategy one? Ignore. Strategy two? Patiently explain. Strategy three? Ignore.

Strategy four? Point out exactly how stupid this whole affair is. Nothing I said tonight--absolutely nothing--is anything but par for the course in this trainwreck. To complain about "Goddess of Peace" after standing quiet on the dozens of childish Obama slurs is somewhere between selective and hypocritical (which is par for this entire affair). And for the record, in the other thread, I did respond to reasoned responses with full explanations as to my point: nobody is clean, nobody is immune, nobody is meeting the standards we're pretending to hold up to the opposition.

If you disagree with using bullshit to point out bullshit, then that's your right. Lord knows I've repeatedly said that metabullshit is rarely effective. But when you take issue with metabullshit, and yet refrain from comment on true bullshit, well...I find it hard to take your chiding seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. I have defended Obama many times here
against stupid attacks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. And I Clinton, and continued to today as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
24. March 2000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KennedyGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. you do live in a fantasy land don't ya?
what color is the sky there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Quite the opposite. I recognize that this entire "shocking" story is a fantasy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:32 PM
Original message
Shouldn't you be using the sarcasm emoticon for that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. The Clintons have been vetted. If something comes up, she'll laugh it off as the usual
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. She's been vetted for 16 years by the finest dirtbags on earth.
There's nothing there, which is why she has the best chance to defeat the Repugnants. Obama history the other hand, has numerous unvetted problems. The Rethugs would have a field day tearing him apart. That's why Dems would be in real trouble if he were to get the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. Go right ahead. Vet all three candidates.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I agree and disagree.
I agree they should be vetted, but not in the misleading/hysterical way they have been. Remember that insane YouTube video from a few days back? When that, the Reagan comments, any one of Bill Clinton's statements, the race issue (re: both sides) and the Rezko business are all given the same level of hysterical "OMG THIS WILL SINK HIM/HER," the net effect is not useful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Actually, didn't see it so I can't comment.
I've been very disinterested in counter accusations of race cards and Rezko.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. You have your facts wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. It will be -- the guy either cops a plea on the first of Feb, or goes to trial on the 25th. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hillary does have a lot of baggage
But her bags have been open for 15 years. I can't say the same for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. Repubs going to say Hillary takes pictures with people she calls slumlords
Came back to bite her in the butt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yes
a photo at somebody else's fundraiser, taken 11 years before she called him a slumlord (actually, she said "slum landlor").
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #12
25. You think Repubs gonna care about the details? They use Rove/Clinton tactics
Edited on Sat Jan-26-08 12:39 AM by dkf
too.

If she wins, (God forbid!) you are going to feel how I feel trying to explain Ronald Reagan and all the other untruths the Clintons laid on Obama.

If it happens, I'm gonna sit back laugh. Hillary will reap what she sowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Do you think they won't use Rezko on Obama, who had a 17 year relationship with
him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Why does Hillary want to bring up contributors? She has LEGIONS of campaign shenanigans
Norman Hsu, is a convicted pyramid investment promoter who associated himself with the apparel industry. His business activities were intertwined with his role as a major fundraiser for the Democratic Party, and he gained notoriety after suspicious patterns of bundled campaign contributions were reported in 2007.<3> Subsequently he was discovered to have been a long-time fugitive in connection with a 1992 fraud conviction.<4><5> After turning himself in to California authorities in 2007 he fled the state again and was quickly recaptured.<6><7><8><9><10><11><12>

By 2007, Hsu's status within Hillary Rodham Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign had risen to the level where he was a "HillRaiser",<23><29> someone who had "bundled" more than $100,000 for her campaign, and to where he co-hosted a $1 million fundraiser at wealthy Democratic Party supporter Ron Burkle's Beverly Hills estate,<3> and in September, he was scheduled to co-host a major gala fundraising event featuring music legend Quincy Jones.<17>

Charlie Trie: The most significant one-time illegal foreign contribution was a $460,000 donation by Yah Lin "Charlie" Trie to President Bill Clinton's legal defense fund. The donation was made by delivery of an envelope containing $460,000 in $1,000 contributions, some on sequentially numbered money orders made out in different names but with the same handwriting.<9>

Johnny Chung: Chung was eventually convicted of bank fraud, tax evasion, and two misdemeanor counts of conspiring to violate election law.<31> Chung asserts that, after his guilty plea, the Chinese government attempted to assassinate him with "hit squads" three times, but the efforts were foiled by the FBI.<32>

Peter Paul: Paul emerged in 2000 as the largest contributor to Senatorial candidate Hillary Clinton. Paul and his attorneys have at various times offered two explanations for this. First, that he was trying to attract her husband, then-President Bill Clinton, to serve on the board of Stan Lee Media after leaving office. Second, that he hoped to negotiate a pardon for his previous criminal convictions.<28><29> Paul produced and underwrote what he described as the largest fund raising event ever held for a federal candidate <30>, in Los Angeles, days before the 2000 Democratic Convention began. The Hollywood Farewell Gala Salute to President William Jefferson Clinton featured prominent entertainers singing for the President, while raising over $1 million for Hillary Clinton's Senate campaign.<31> The event cost $1.9 million to organize according to Paul and $500,000 according to the Federal Election Commission filing, much of it borrowed fraudulently by Paul from Merrill Lynch. Later indictments would state that Merrill Lynch lost about $5 million it had lent to Paul.<29>

Two days after the gala, the Washington Post publicized Paul's criminal record, and Hillary Clinton denied knowing Paul and "vowed not to take any contributions from him". Through her official spokesman, Howard Wolfson, Hillary stated on August 16, 2000 that she would return $2,000 she reported receiving from Paul in June 2000,<29> and would not have anything further to do with him.

John Huang: John Huang (pronounced "Hwä"), was another major figure convicted. Born in 1945 in Nanping, Fujian, Huang and his father fled to Taiwan at the end of the Chinese Civil War before he eventually emigrated to the United States in 1969. A former employee of the Indonesian company Lippo Group's Lippo Bank and its owners Mochtar Riady and his son James (whom Huang first met along with Bill Clinton at a financial seminar in Little Rock, Arkansas in 1980), Huang became a key fund-raiser within the DNC in 1995. While there, he raised $3.4 million for the party. Nearly half had to be returned when questions arose regarding their source during later investigations by Congress.<33>

Marc Rich: Marc Rich, a fugitive, was pardoned of tax evasion, after clemency pleas from Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak, among many other international luminaries. He was required to pay a $100 million dollar fine and waive any use of the pardon as a defense against any future civil charges that were filed against him in the same case. Critics complained that Denise Rich, his former wife, had made substantial donations to the Clinton library and to Mrs. Clinton's senate campaign. Emails uncovered during the course of the investigation revealed that her final donation was provided a year before Scooter Libby requested that she approach Clinton for a pardon. According to Paul Volcker's independent investigation of Iraqi Oil-for-Food kickback schemes, Marc Rich was a middleman for several suspect Iraqi oil deals involving over 4 million barrels of oil.<16>

I'll stop here, but I can go on if you like.

Source: Wikipedia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Do you think the GOP won't bring up Rezko on Obama? Hm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Rezko is already a Democratic problem. Hillary owns him now too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. So you agree the GOP will use Rezko against Obama if he is the nominee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Of course they will. And they will use Rezko and Trie and Paul and Rich and "Hillraiser" Norman Hsu
against Hillary.

Norman Hsu was a Hillraiser...that is funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. Wow a photo w Rezko at someone else's fundraiser is going to matter as much as a 17 year
relationship?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Its already happening: Clintons' picture with Rezko has FOX Friends in a tizzy
Reported by Chrish - January 25, 2008

Steve Doocy didn't come out and say "this is huuuuge" today 1/25/08, but he was clearly excited at the release of a picture (dating by the hairdo I'm estimating 1992-1993) of the Clintons posing with none other than Tony Rezko between them. Rezko, you'll recall, is under indictment in Chicago and was pointedly brought up by Hillary Clinton in Monday's Democratic debate as a "slumlord" who Barack Obama represented and has had a long-term relationship with.

Doocy first excitedly teased that "A very embarrassing moment is about to take place on the Democrats' side." and reminded viewers of the exchange Monday night. Brian Kilmeade responded "So wait, Tony Rezko's the problem with Barack Obama and that's Tony Rezko in the middle with Hillary Clinton???" Doocy answered "Yes, can you believe it? How delicious is that?"

Thirty minutes later, after Gretchen Carlson made a grand exit from the set to go to the Miss America pageant, Doocy repeated that "Suddenly out of nowhere this morning on the Internet the most embarrassing photograph of the presidential campaign has surfaced. it links Hillary Clinton to that man right there, between her and her husband Bill Clinton...that guy is Tony Resko." He reminded viewers again of Monday night's exchange, papraphrasing that Hillary Clinton said Obama "had been cozy" with this guy and his slum landlord business (actually, she charged that Obama was representing Rezko).

http://www.newshounds.us/2008/01/25/clintons_picture_with_rezko_has_fox_friends_in_a_tizzy.php

Republicans love this stuff. Its going to be ALL over the talkshows and the internet and cable...the public won't know the difference. KARMA!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. That's fine. Hillary is the best equipped Dem candidate to deal with Fox news and the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. Worst of all she will be tagged "HYPOCRITE".
Edited on Sat Jan-26-08 01:27 AM by dkf
But I'm sure she is used to that.

And she is used to defending her indicted friends because she has so much experience at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. Wow - go ahead and cheer on Fox news and Rish Limbaugh.
Eww.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. Hillary uses Fox and Limbaugh tactics.
Edited on Sat Jan-26-08 01:31 AM by dkf
I used to feel bad for her, but when I realized it was right up her alley I lost all sympathy.

She will be good at defending the tactics because she is one of them...the distorters, the manipulators, the purveyor of untruths.

Why do you think I can't stand her? Its because I lump her with those who are bad influences on our political system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. And you cheer on Fox and Limbaugh against an elected Democrat. Enjoyng it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. I don't care if they are a Democrat or a Republican.
If they deliberately lie and manipulate the public I won't stand for it.

And I find it worse when it is someone in my group.

If I find dishonesty on the other side, well, what do you expect from them.

But I expect my people to do better than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. LOL! Yet you cheer on Fox news? Talk about liars.
:lol:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. Fox is not my people. I'm not responsible for them.
Edited on Sat Jan-26-08 01:42 AM by dkf
I want my side to be the good guys. That is why I like Keith Olbermann. He's my guy!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. Enjoy Fox and your other new friends smearing the Democratic nominee.
:lol:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. Its like when you are watching the bad guys fight the other bad guys...
I ain't got no dog in that fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #30
35. Calm Down - Whomever The Dem Nominee Is - Remember They're Running......
against the "Culture of Corruption". The party with the "wide stance"; "CIA outers"; "liars"; etc.

Rezko - if there is anything there - there - is small potatoes in comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
14. The Chicago media vetted the Rezko "matter" for two years and go shit
The only people who want to make it an issue are the people who support a candidate with 25 cases where Rezko looks like a garden nymph.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
15. There's a picture of the Clintons with out there now
So they can bring him up with her too. Which would be a sort of karmic retribution for Senator Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yes. The more Rezko is in the news the better for Obama.
Real smart. :lol:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
22. Like they won't
bring up Hsu for Clinton or revisit all the old crap that has already been vetted but will be examined ad nauseum even if nothing was found the first time around.

It doesn't matter who our candidate is, the GOP will Swiftboat, smear, slime, imply and lie about him or her. Just because Clinton has been 'vetted' that doesn't mean they'll shut the fuck up.

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC