|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:49 PM Original message |
Nearly 100,000 indpendents walked away fron the GOP primary in SC last week |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
THUNDER HANDS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
1. 100,000? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:54 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. actually it is 94,000... I compared data availabe on CNN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
2. Oh, I am sure there'll be dirty tricks a-plenty - one reason why polls are junk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
3. Predictions are useless these days. People lie, people don't have land lines.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:53 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. and pollsters fix samples, questions as they please (how many women did they ask?) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:56 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. here is the data |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
4. McCain actually got a lower percentage of support in SC last week |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frances (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 12:58 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. It does say something about the Repub party's woes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. If Obama is our nominee, maybe--I think that there will be enough excitement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frances (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 01:13 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Just don't see Obama winning South Carolina in the general |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 01:16 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Only if the GOP melts down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
9. By SC law, they are not allowed to vote in the Dem. primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 01:15 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. They can declare the day of the primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 01:23 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. they would have to LIE, not declare |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blindpig (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 01:40 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Don't have to lie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 02:25 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. then you are saying that the linked information that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catbird (633 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 01:40 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Not necessarily |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frances (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 01:43 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. What I love about DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 02:26 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. so you are saying that the info linked on the web is incorrect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooky3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 02:35 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Here's an article that suggests the oath was rescinded in 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blindpig (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-26-08 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
18. The bear's share will go to Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 10:04 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC