Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I've heard DUers say it is time to get mean against other Democrats. When people say

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:01 PM
Original message
I've heard DUers say it is time to get mean against other Democrats. When people say
Edited on Sat Jan-26-08 08:02 PM by xultar
hey, you shouldn't be mean to Dems people say we don't lock step...yadda yadda yadda.

I also see that people want to be angry and act as angry as the Rethugs cuz being nice has gotten us no where.

Well when Hillary Clinton campaigns tough against OBama I here that she's being ROVE like.

Back in the day people didn't like Daschel because he had no back bone. Now when you get a woman candidate who get's tough and has a back bone then I hear she's being cold and mean against nice sweet Mr. Cool Obama.

Which I find funny because if she was being soft you'd say that there is no way she could take the brunt of a GOP attack... but we'll talk about that later.

So which is it DU? You wanna get tough or you want it soft?

I'm confused. It seems that it is o.k. to call Pelosi names, Reid names because they aren't tough. So DEM on DEM violence is o.k as long as it is against Dems you don't like.

Did I get that right?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tough != dishonest.
Your analogy is flawed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. They've both been dishonest. If you can't see that you're lost in the fuckin fog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not even close
Its ok to take dems to task on their positions its not ok to lie about their positions to garner a win. The idea is to take the fight to them with the facts on your side not to wildly make shit up.

The reason we give pelosi a bad time is because of her positions not because we just dont like her so we make any shit up we can think of to try and slime her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Puhleez. Both Obama and Clinton have bent the truth. Don't be blind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hard yet gentle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. No problem with what you say here, but when I see Pelosi gazing at Bush** like
a high school cheerleader does at the star football player, it irks me...a lot. And when she and Reid buckle under, it's tough to take. Yes we like tough leaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. WHAT THE FUCK....Your remark is SEXIST as FUCKING HELL.
If you can't see that then ...(if I posted what I wanted to say here it would get deleted.)

BTW...how would you know what she is thinking. Your post is FUCKING SEXIST.
I'm going to post it to my blog.

I'm going to make sure people see how progressives really think.


You want her to look @ him like she's thinking FUCK YOU? She can't do that. If you're a grown up you'd know that.

I could be cursing your entire family in my mind but my eyes would never let you know.

You NEVAH EVAH let them see your fucking cards.


Grow up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. ...
actually, at the last state of the union I thought she was looking at him like she was thinking FUCK YOU, and I have been happy to see her (and reid) reign it in a little...you know, playing thier cards close to thier vests as you suggest. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Bullshit that its sexist. (How do you know what's behind my words?)
If Pelosi would stand her ground instead of giving in I wouldn't be talking about her obvious admiration of Bush**.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. loooking at him like a high school cheerleader...um...WHAT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Check out some of the news photos, better yet wait for next one where she
is sitting next to Bush** after dropping her demands on some bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Follow me into GD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think there is an inherent difference between tough...
(i.e. challenging another candidates policy positions, record etc.) and being rovian (i.e. mischaracterizing policy positions, record etc. using knowingly false information) **and since I am in the any dem will do camp I have no dog in this fight, so I'm not saying ANY candidate is more rovian than the next** That being said, I would like to see any candidate/supporter employing such bullshit tactics to knock it off and actually get tough! :rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. I guess it depends on who you support
It seems that people are a lot more flexible in their thinking when they've committed to a candidate. Flexible seems to mean that even hypocrisy is acceptible. Oh, well - there's an awful lot left to this primary - we'll see how it goes from here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's apples M' peaches
Edited on Sat Jan-26-08 08:08 PM by Xipe Totec
I don't dislike any of the presidential candidates.

I have not said anything against Hillary or Barack.

I just happen to like John better.

Pelosi and and Reid are another matter entirely.


If impeachment is off the table, they are not performing their obligations.

They should be replaced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. A campaign is a streetbrawl, doesn't matter what party your opponent(s) is in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychmommy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. sometimes i like it tough and sometimes i like it gentle.
i never like it soft though. oh you're talking about campaigning-i want to know where you stand on my issues. not the the petty personal attacks and tagteams. i guess sc agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. I can only speak for me- but
I don't like "hard" and "mean"-

I don't care if it's from a man or a woman. Dem- Republic- or Indie.

I actually really approve of J.Edwards platform- but not his style- He is more aggressive, and less conciliatory- which is (in part) why Obama's my #1-. Obama isn't mean or hard- and he is attracting people from all demographics- I think 8+ years of mean- conniving- and hard have taken their toll on us all. We may have adopted some of the attitudes, but we don't want them-

Dem on Dem hate and bashing is not ok in my view. If we eat our own, and shoot our wounded, and think that is OK- then this isn't the party for me. That doesn't embody the ideals of the Democratic party-

At least that's my take.

peace~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tulkas Donating Member (592 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. More dishonesty from the Clinton camp


We want her to be tough, but she hides behind her husband.

In the South Carolina debate she said "well he isn't here" ducking what Bill said about Barack

That isn't tough, it is cowardly


It's her attack dog, It's her responsibility
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandem5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. its funny that Daschle is now one of Obama's lead advisors nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
19. You got it wrong Hill never got tough with bush, she voted for his war. She never got
tough with the health insurance companies, she kissed their ass.

She never got tough with the corporations, she kissed their ass too.

She played the gender card, but it didn't work that well. She started race baiting and she got her ass kicked.

I'm not even an Obama supporter, but I'm very glad he won big and did very well across ethnic, age and gender demographics.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC