|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
BeatleBoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 12:07 AM Original message |
Delegate Scorecard as of January 26, 2008 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
1. We have a long long way to go! Thought we were further along. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NastyRiffraff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 12:12 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Absolutely. This won't be decided quickly, and I'm glad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 12:13 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Yep. It's so long-winded! Kinda like walking a mile while people are beating you up with sticks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
3. Does the first person to get 2,025 become the nom? Thanks. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 01:34 AM Response to Reply #3 |
11. 1,013 gets you the nom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Konza (237 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 02:00 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. A total of 4,049 delegates are chosen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 02:15 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Thanks. I get it now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Konza (237 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 02:19 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. No problem! there's also.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clintonista2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 02:34 AM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Oops sorry, I thought that 2025 was the TOTAL number of delegates out there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
5. That's adding in the superdelegates...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tulkas (592 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
6. SUPER DELEGATES DON'T COUNT (yet) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeatleBoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 12:19 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. I'm supporting the guy at the bottom of the list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tulkas (592 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 12:39 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Super delegates are not committed in any way, you can't count them yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeatleBoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 01:31 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. What's with all of the Obama Vitriol ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 02:26 AM Response to Reply #10 |
17. You're the one posting the bad information |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeatleBoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 02:58 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. What Bullshit? It's from CNN for Godssakes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 03:02 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Any numbers, MSM source or not, that include super delegates, are bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeatleBoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 03:12 AM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 03:17 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Rather because superdelegates are uncommitted, and generally vote with the majority of delegates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeatleBoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 03:19 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. So what you're saying is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 03:21 AM Response to Reply #29 |
30. She'd have to change her luck first. Unless I'm misremembering, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeatleBoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 03:36 AM Response to Reply #30 |
35. I wouldn't be measuring the White House Drapes yet if I were BHO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 03:22 AM Response to Reply #25 |
32. Ask Howard Dean how super delegates work out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snarkoleptic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
8. Edwards is picking up steam at the expense of Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 01:47 AM Response to Original message |
12. K and R. Let the truth be told. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 02:24 AM Response to Original message |
16. Those aren't elected delegates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 03:01 AM Response to Original message |
20. Here's the delegate scorecard...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egnever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 03:07 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. that layout is very confusing Frenchie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 04:35 AM Response to Reply #22 |
37. Remove the super delegate row, and the obama is ahead..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeatleBoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 03:08 AM Response to Reply #20 |
24. And at that website, here are the delegate counts with Super-Delegates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 03:08 AM Response to Original message |
23. Those numbers are bullshit. Superdelegates can change on a whim. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeatleBoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 03:15 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. So go take it up with CNN and Realclearpolitics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 03:16 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. I don't have a problem with them providing those numbers; they're interesting enough. But |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tweed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 03:23 AM Response to Reply #27 |
33. And provide on the main POLITICS page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tweed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 03:22 AM Response to Original message |
31. Well CNN also has this page too: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BringBigDogBack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 03:25 AM Response to Original message |
34. I don't mind either number.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-27-08 03:42 AM Response to Original message |
36. Here's the website I trust the most when it comes to Delegate Totals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-28-08 03:03 AM Response to Original message |
38. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC