Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SurveyUSA California Poll: Obama closing gap

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:12 AM
Original message
SurveyUSA California Poll: Obama closing gap
In CA, Obama Closes On Clinton; Had Been Down 37, Now 11:

In a Democratic Primary in California today, 01/28/08, eight days to the vote, Hillary Clinton defeats Barack Obama 49% to 38%, according to this latest SurveyUSA tracking poll conducted for KABC-TV Los Angeles, KPIX-TV San Francisco, KGTV-TV San Diego and KFSN-TV Fresno.

Compared to SurveyUSA's most recent CA poll released two weeks ago, before Obama's South Carolina win, Hillary Clinton is down 1 point, Obama is up 3 points, and John Edwards, who finishes today at 9%, is down 1 point.

In October, Clinton led Obama by 37 points; today, it's 11 points. Obama today leads among men by 11 points; Clinton leads among women by 30 points -- a 41-point Gender Gap. Clinton today takes 43% of the white vote; Obama takes 41, a virtual tie, and significant in that Clinton led among white voters by 25 points at the beginning of December. Click here to see that tracking graph.

http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=7417510e-b5e4-4e94-a6f2-fd6e70635255
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ZinZen Donating Member (599 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Polls here in CA will get closer.
that is my prediction. Also the young vote for Obama will be a bigger spread IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. California? Got this from DU P earlier - Hillary leading absentee voters in California 53%-30%
Hillary leading absentee voters in California 53%-30%, about 50% of votes expected to be absentee

http://www.calendarlive.com/media/acrobat/2008-01/34975049.pdf

Absentee voters are strongly supporting Clinton by 53% to 30%.

This is not a poll. These are real votes, cast and counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demblue4life Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Are you sure these is an official count or simply a poll result?
I'm a little confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. My dear Demblue4life!
Welcome to DU!

It isn't always this crazy...

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demblue4life Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I know. I heard it's crazier! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
29. No, IT ISN'T an official count. Absentee ballots are not counted until the polls close
I am not sure where the OP says that these are "actual" votes, since they haven't been counted

http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/elections_oc.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I have a question
Those are the actual counts? Are they supposed to be giving that information out? I thought that while the ballots are counted before the polls close, that they wouldn't/shouldn't be giving that information out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demblue4life Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. From the article, looks like it's not actual votes
"About half of voters are expected to use mail-in ballots -- which have been available since Jan. 7 -- and Clinton was romping over Obama among that group, 53% to 30%. Among those expecting to cast ballots in a traditional precinct visit, the race was a closer 42% to 34% in Clinton's favor. Former Massachusetts Gov. Romney was also running stronger among mail-in voters, if still behind McCain."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Okay
I just don't like the idea of any vote totals being given out before polls close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Could be like an exit poll and not a count. I'll check but you could be right...
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 01:33 AM by suston96
...absentee ballots cannot be counted usually until election day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Thanks for checking
:)

I tried to look earlier today on this and couldn't come up with anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demblue4life Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. Just found this: Early voting began in California two weeks ago
And it's safe to assume that around that time, Clinton's lead as moderately large.
This is an article dated January 6th, 2008 from what seems to be a CA radio station news website:

Vote-by-mail ballots go out this week in the nation's most populous state, forcing presidential campaigns to consider using scarce dollars to lure early California voters while contests unfold in New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada.


http://www.ktvu.com/politics/14988786/detail.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. So, it's in a exit poll
or the actual vote counts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demblue4life Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. I'm not sure. Still confused n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Hey, that makes two of us!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demblue4life Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. But exit poll or not...You can be sure that...
early voters favored Clinton, because it is now clear that Obama will make this tight as we approach February 5th. He might be statistically tied with her soon; but again, those who already voted did so without having seen the media manufactured race-war and the impressive Obama win in South Carolina, events that were both beneficial to Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Oh, I agree
I do believe that early votes were favored towards Clinton.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #20
32. They DO NOT COUNT ANY VOTES until AFTER the POLLS CLOSE
Immediately upon the close of polls on election day, the county elections officials and the Secretary of State begin what is called the "semifinal official canvass of the vote" - the tallying of early-returned vote-by-mail ballots and the ballots cast in each of the state's 24,000+ voting precincts. The semifinal official canvass begins at 8:00 p.m. on election night and continues uninterrupted until the last precinct is counted and reported to the Secretary of State.
The vote tallying process actually begins before election night, with the vote-by-mail ballots. Any county that counts its ballots by computer (all 58 do) may begin processing vote-by-mail seven (7) days before the election. Having verified the signatures on the return envelopes, elections officials remove the voted ballots and process them through their vote tallying system. Under no circumstances may they tabulate the results until after the close of polls on election day. Most counties continue this processing until they begin their election-day preparations for counting the precinct vote. Mail ballots not counted by that time and all those received on election day, either through the mail or at the precincts, are tabulated during the official canvass of the vote.



http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/elections_oc.htm

Under no circumstances may they tabulate the results until after the close of polls on election day.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demblue4life Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. But if it's an exit poll, it's bad news for Obama
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 01:41 AM by Demblue4life
Because exit polls are known for being much more accurate than regular pre-election polls.
When an exit poll is said to be inaccurate, it's because it was off by 4-6%, I would say, and even assuming that this "exit poll" was as flawed as it could have been, it means that Clinton still won the votes cast so far by a large margin.

And reading the pdf link given by one DU member earlier in this thread, it seems that yes, many voters have indeed already cast their ballots. Read this excerpt:

In the earlier poll, Clinton was beating Obama by 16 points among precinct voters. This isn’t surprising, given absentee voters cast their ballot before certain events happen, such as Obama’s big win in South Carolina on Saturday and thendorsement of him by Senator Edward Kennedy.


http://www.faceoxy.com/index.php?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.calendarlive.com%2Fmedia%2Facrobat%2F2008-01%2F34975049.pdf

What this would mean is that Clinton got lucky that many voters did not see Obama's SC win or the subsequent press coverage before voting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Absentee voters are typically white, wealthy, and conservative. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. That may be true but, 50% of CA voters will vote absentee. That's a lot.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. The primaries also have an elite turnout
I'm hoping not so much this year...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. So that bodes badly for Obama since that is a demographic that Obama does well among
One thing that is overlooked is the class gap between Obama and Hillary's support. Obama is getting beaten badly among Latinos and Asians in California. He needs a healthy margin among whites coupled with a repeat of South Carolina's four out of five black votes performance to have a chance in California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #19
34. Do you live in California? I do, and there is one thing certain
NOTHING IS CERTAIN ABOUT CALIFORNIA

The independents and nonpartisans will decide California


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. I know so many people who've never voted before
who plan to turn out for Obama next week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. I just mailed my ballot in yesterday for Obama /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
28. Absentee ballots are NOT counted until polls are closed
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 02:35 AM by still_one
I vote absentee, and I will be casting my vote for Obama

What will determine California WILL NOT BE THE Democrats or the republicans, but the INDEPENDENTS and those who decline to state.

They have a choice of ballots, either nonpartisan, Independent, or Democratic

The repukes require that if you want to vote republican in California, you must be registered as a republican

You say these are real votes, not a poll, on what basis if they haven't been counted?


http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/elections_oc.htm

Under no circumstances may they tabulate the results until after the close of polls on election day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
35. You're wrong, or course. Absentee ballots aren't counted before
the close of the polls on election day. Pretty elementary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
13. That "41-point Gender Gap" will only widen when
the women of California hear about the handshake issue tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neutron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. YES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. That would be spreading a lie. AP has corrected the story tonight, saying
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 01:44 AM by caligirl
Obama had already turned away BEFORE Clinton tried to shake Kennedy's hand. There is no snub, it was an error corrected by the original source. I'll try to find the thread and post it here.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4261467

see post number ten, the OP corrects his own thread. Ethical behavior I admire at DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:21 AM
Response to Original message
26. The point spread is huge
and needs help, that is why Ted was going with obama to campaign there.

Does anyone know if it is a winner take all state for the delegates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. They're divvied up based on precincts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. Thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
31. I heard a rumor about the delegates being almost even if either one gets 30% is this true?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demblue4life Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. I wouldn't be surprised, since Iowa's delegate distribution was crazy
Didn't Hil get more delegates than Edwards even though she came in third?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC